Long-term survival of VDD pacing.

UNLABELLED: All patients with VDD systems implanted at a tertiary pacing center were identified from a computer database and data collected on pacing indications, follow-up duration, rate response, reasons for programming changes, and implant P wave amplitudes. RESULTS: 366 implants were identified for which complete data were available for 335 leads implanted in 316 patients. The mean follow-up period was 24.1 months, and age at implant was 73.5 +/- 11.8 years. During follow-up, 19 patients died (6%) and 62 (19.6%) were followed elsewhere. Indications for pacing were complete heart block, 56.6%; intermittent AV block, 21.8%; postablation complete heart block, 5.4%; 2:1 AV block, 13%; and others, 3.2%. Two groups: no mode change (NMC, n = 280) and mode change (MC, n = 36) were identified. Reasons for reprogramming in the MC group were as follows: atrial sensing, 11; AF/atrial flutter, 18; chronotropic incompetence, 3; and others 4. Significantly more MC patients had rate response programmed ON (44.4% vs 22.1%, P < 0.05). No significant differences between the two groups were found in other variables, including male gender (55.5% vs 54.6%), length of follow-up (27.1 +/- 17.8 vs 23.8 +/- 20.6 months), age at last follow-up (72 +/- 12.3 vs 75.9 +/- 11.9 years), and P wave amplitude (1.7 +/- 0.9 vs 1.8 +/- 0.9 mV). CONCLUSION: Reprogramming of VDD systems is infrequent. When necessary, it is usually prompted by atrial arrhythmias or failure of atrial sensing. When adequate atrial chronotropy has been verified, VDD is an acceptable alternative to DDD pacing and survives well over the long term.

Comparison of haemodynamic responses to dobutamine and salbutamol in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.

Nine patients with critically reduced cardiac output after acute myocardial infarction underwent a single cross-over comparison of dobutamine and salbutamol to compare the haemodynamic effects of these drugs, which have, respectively, predominantly beta 1-adrenergic and beta 2-adrenergic agonist activity. The responses were used to select the more appropriate treatment for individual patients. Only relatively small responses were obtained: those with poorest baseline measurements tended to show the least effect. When the results from the series were averaged, dobutamine (250-750 microgram/min) caused a small but progressive increase in cardiac index (1.8 to 2.2 1/min/m2) throughout the dose range. Systemic blood pressure was not increased, and calculated systemic vascular resistance fell from 25 to 19 units. Heart rate rose from 107 to 118 beats/min and stroke index from 17 to 19 ml/beat/m2. Pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressure fell from 18 to 15 mm Hg. Salbutamol (10-40 microgram/min) produced a similar progressive increase in cardiac index, from 1.6 to 2.21/min/m2. Systemic blood pressure was not altered, and systemic vascular resistance fell from 25 to 20 units. Heart rate rose from 105 to 119 beats/min and stroke index from 16 to 19 ml/beat/m2. Pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressure did not fall. Dobutamine and salbutamol have closely similar haemodynamic effects when used in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Both drugs increase cardiac index but heart rate also rises, and the increase in stroke index is relatively small. Mean arterial pressure is altered little by either agent, but dobutamine (in contrast with dopamine) tends to reduce pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressure, which may be beneficial.