ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Nuestro principal objetivo es el de comparar la capacidad para detectar las drusas del disco óptico (DDO) utilizando diversas técnicas de imágenes no-invasivas, incluida la novedosa técnica de imagen de retromodo (RMI). Como segundo objetivo analizamos las características morfológicas de las DDO bajo esta última técnica. Materiales y métodos: Este estudio incluyó un total de 7 pacientes con DDO bilaterales, obteniendo un total de 14 ojos analizados. Se utilizaron técnicas no invasivas de imágenes multimodales, que incluyeron fotografía multicolor del fondo de ojo (MC), reflectancia en infrarrojo (NIR), autofluorescencia en luz verde y en luz azul (G-FAF y B-FAF, respectivamente) y RMI. La FAF se utilizó como el método principal para el diagnóstico de DDO. Dos observadores realizaron las comparaciones, obteniendo las tasas de detección de cada uno de los métodos. Las mediciones cuantitativas de las DDO incluyeron el número, el perímetro (P) y el área (A) de las DDO identificadas mediante la técnica de RMI. Resultado: La edad promedio de los pacientes incluidos fue de 49,28±23,16 años; 5 de los 7 pacientes fueron de sexo masculino. La técnica de RMI pudo detectar DDO en todos los casos, con una sensibilidad del 100%, en comparación con MC (sensibilidad del 60,71%), NIR (sensibilidad del 60,71%), B-FAF (sensibilidad del 100%), G-FAF (sensibilidad del 100%). RMI fue la única técnica de imagen capaz de evaluar morfológica y cuantitativamente las DDO. Conclusiones: RMI es una prometedora modalidad no-invasiva de imagen para diagnosticar DDO superficiales, proporcionando información valiosa sobre la distribución, la ubicación y el tamaño de estas. Por lo tanto, mediante nuestros resultados sugerimos la incorporación de la novedosa técnica de RMI como una herramienta complementaria para el diagnóstico y el seguimiento de DDO en combinación con los otros métodos de imagen multimodales.(AU)
Objective: We aimed to compare the detectability of optic disc drusen (ODD), using various non-invasive imaging techniques, including the novel retro-mode imaging (RMI), as well as to analyze the morphological characteristics of ODD on RMI. Methods: This study involved 7 patients with bilateral ODD, totaling 14 eyes. Multimodal imaging techniques, including multicolor fundus photography (MC), near-infrared reflectance (NIR), green and blue light fundus autofluorescence (G-FAF and B-FAF, respectively), and RMI were used to examine the eyes. FAF was used as the primary method of identifying ODD, and each method's detection rate was compared by two observers. Quantitative measurements of ODD included the number of ODD visualized by the RMI technique, the perimeter (P) and area (A) of ODD were identified. Results: The average age of the patients included was 49.28±23.16 years, with 5 of the 7 being men. RMI was able to detect ODD in all cases, with a sensitivity of 100%, compared to MC (sensitivity 60.71%), NIR (sensitivity 60.71%), B-FAF (sensitivity 100%), G-FAF (sensitivity 100%). RMI was the only imaging technique capable of assessing ODD morphology and quantifying ODD. Conclusions: RMI is a promising imaging modality for diagnosing superficial ODD, providing valuable information on the distribution, location, and size of ODD. We suggest the incorporation of RMI as a complementary tool for diagnosing and monitoring ODD in combination with other multimodal imaging methods.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Optic Disk , Optic Disk Drusen , Vision, Ocular , Ophthalmology , France , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The study aimed to discern the intent to treat with the therapeutic agents prescribed first or second line in the following eye conditions: neovascular age-related macular Degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and myopic maculopathy with choroidal neovascularization (MMNV). The study also aimed to distinguish the ophthalmologists' intended treatment for their patients from those that they would prescribe for themselves if they were affected by the above macular conditions. METHODS: The study utilized an online survey of 243 French ophthalmologists practicing medical retina, with males accounting for 54.3% of the participants. Data was obtained using a questionnaire that focused on the ophthalmologists' experience with various agents as well as their first and second line choices for nAMD, DME, RVO, and MMNV. RESULTS: The vast majority of French ophthalmologists (99%) had experience with the most widely used anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs); ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept. Fewer than 8% reported experience with anti-VEGF drug reservoirs, biosimilars, or faricimab. The study findings also showed ranibizumab and aflibercept as the commonly prescribed first line choices for the above-mentioned ocular conditions. For the second line choice, the study showed that aflibercept and dexamethasone intravitreal implants were the most common across the four retinal conditions studied. The only difference in intent to treat for "patients" versus "yourself" was for biosimilars (0% to 0.8%, P=0.001). CONCLUSION: The findings regarding the first and second line choices for the mentioned ocular disorders were found to agree with the findings of published literature currently used in practice, with a tendency to prefer ranibizumab as first line therapy for neovascular disorders and aflibercept as first line therapy for macular edema. In addition, there were no differences between choices for first and second line therapy for patients vs. ophthalmologists.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the detectability of optic disc drusen (ODD), using various non-invasive imaging techniques, including the novel retro-mode imaging (RMI), as well as to analyze the morphological characteristics of ODD on RMI. METHODS: This study involved seven patients with bilateral ODD, totaling 14 eyes. Multimodal imaging techniques, including multicolor fundus photography (MC), near-infrared reflectance (NIR), green and blue light fundus autofluorescence (G-FAF and B-FAF, respectively), and RMI were used to examine the eyes. FAF was used as the primary method of identifying ODD, and each method's detection rate was compared by two observers. Quantitative measurements of ODD included the number of ODD visualized by the RMI technique, the perimeter (P) and area (A) of ODD were identified. RESULTS: The average age of the patients included was 49.28⯱â¯23.16 years, with five of the seven being men. RMI was able to detect ODD in all cases, with a sensitivity of 100%, compared to MC (sensitivity 60.71%), NIR (sensitivity 60.71%), B-FAF (sensitivity 100%), G-FAF (sensitivity 100%). RMI was the only imaging technique capable of assessing ODD morphology and quantifying ODD. CONCLUSIONS: RMI is a promising imaging modality for diagnosing superficial ODD, providing valuable information on the distribution, location, and size of ODD. We suggest the incorporation of RMI as a complementary tool for diagnosing and monitoring ODD in combination with other multimodal imaging methods.
