ABSTRACT
To better understand the challenges of generally implementing and adapting computational phenotyping approaches, the performance of a Phenotype KnowledgeBase (PheKB) algorithm for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was evaluated on a University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) patient population, focusing on examining its performance on ambiguous cases. The algorithm was evaluated on a cohort of 4,766 patients, along with a chart review of 300 patients by rheumatologists against accepted diagnostic guidelines. The performance revealed low sensitivity towards specific subtypes of positive RA cases, which suggests revisions in features used for phenotyping. A close examination of select cases also indicated a significant portion of patients with missing data, drawing attention to the need to consider data integrity as an integral part of phenotyping pipelines, as well as issues around the usability of various codes for distinguishing cases. We use patterns in the PheKB algorithm's errors to further demonstrate important considerations when designing a phenotyping algorithm.
