Endometriosis infiltrating the pelvic floor muscles with histopathological correlation-A case report.

We report the case of a 29-year-old woman with deep infiltrating endometriosis who underwent robotic nerve-sparing surgery for resection of all visible lesions infiltrating pelvic and extrapelvic sites. Painful symptoms included severe dysmenorrhea, menstrual dyschezia and stranguria, with no improvement in response to hormonal treatment. The location on physical examination of a painful retrocervical nodule was identified by magnetic resonance imaging to be infiltrating the right parametrium/paracervix. During surgery, this nodule was recognized as an important retrocervical/rectovaginal lesion infiltrating the pelvic floor (i.e. levator ani and coccygeus), and was histopathologically confirmed as endometriosis infiltrating the skeletal pelvic floor muscles. A Pubmed search of the MEDLINE database in March (2019) found no publication reporting histopathologic confirmation of endometriosis infiltrating the pelvic floor muscles.

Endometriosis of the round ligament of the uterus.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the prevalence of endometriosis in the intrapelvic portion of the round ligaments of the uterus (RLUs) and to propose criteria for their excision. DESIGN: Retrospective case series analysis of women undergoing laparoscopy for the treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: We evaluated 174 patients who underwent laparoscopy for the treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) between April 2006 and May 2009. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent laparoscopy for the treatment of DIE and had their RLUs removed when there was shortening, deviation, or thickening. After removal, the RLUs were sent for histopathologic analysis to verify the presence or absence of endometriosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The prevalence of endometriosis in the RLUs and the association between the macroscopic alterations and the anatomic pathology results were determined. After the identification of macroscopic alterations, 1 or both RLUs (for a total of 42) were removed from 27 of the 174 patients who underwent laparoscopy. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the macroscopic criteria proposed for endometriosis of the RLU was 83.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 72.1%-94.5%), with 35 positive RLUs out of the 42 that were excised. The prevalence of endometriosis of the RLU was 13.8% (95% CI = 8.7%-18.9%), with 24 patients having a positive histopathologic examination result for endometriosis. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of RLU endometriosis in patients with DIE was 13.8%, which emphasizes that a rigorous evaluation of this structure must be part of the routine surgical treatment of patients with endometriosis.

Diagnostic hysteroscopy using liquid distention medium: comparison of pain with warmed saline solution vs room-temperature saline solution.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare pain intensity and degree of satisfaction reported by patients undergoing hysteroscopic examinations using saline solution kept at room temperature (control group) or saline solution heated to 37.5°C (test group). DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, prospective study (Canadian Task Force Classification I). PATIENTS: Sixty-four women underwent diagnostic hysteroscopy during the second half of 2008. INTERVENTION: In both the test and control groups, examinations were performed using the vaginoscopy technique without use of a speculum or Pozzi tenaculum forceps. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale immediately after the examination and at 1 and 15 minutes after the procedure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Immediately after the examination, mean (SD; 95% confidence interval) pain intensity in the warmed saline solution group was 3.84 (2.71; 2.89-4.79), and in the room-temperature saline solution group was 4.31 (3.02; 3.18-5.44) (p = .51). At 1 and 15 minutes after the procedure, pain intensity in the 2 groups was, respectively, 2.41 (2.00; 1.66-3.16) and 2.43 (2.49; 1.57-3.30) (p = .96), and 1.83 (2.30; 1.02-2.64) and 1.85 (2.06; 1.08-2.62) (p = .96). Differences were not significant. Time to complete the examination was 3.80 (1.32; 3.34-4.26) minutes in the test group, and 3.75 (1.10; 3.34-4.15) minutes in the control group (p = .82). The satisfaction rate with the warmed distention medium was 84% (95% confidence interval, 72%-96%), and with the room-temperature saline solution was 85% (73%-97%) with saline at room temperature (p = .48). CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups insofar as pain, duration of the examination, and degree of patient satisfaction.