Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Phys Eng Sci Med ; 2024 Jun 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38884669

ABSTRACT

Performance testing of gamma cameras and single photon computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) systems is not subject to regulatory requirements across states and territories in Australia. Internationally recognised testing standards from organisations such as the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) describe methodologies for recommended tests. However, variations exist in suggested quality control (QC) schedules from professional bodies such as the Australia and New Zealand Society of Nuclear Medicine (ANZSNM). In this study, a survey was conducted to benchmark current QC programs across a selected sample of eight standalone and networked Australian public hospitals. Vendor-specific flood-field uniformity (intrinsic or extrinsic/system) verification without photomultiplier (PMT) tuning and CT QC were performed at all sites. Weekly and monthly PMT tuning followed by intrinsic flood-field verifications were performed at most sites. At least half of the sites performed monthly centre of rotation (COR) offset verifications. SPECT/CT alignment calibrations and verifications were undertaken by service engineers at all sites, and periodic verifications were performed by local staff at varying frequencies. Variations were observed for other periodic QC tests such as spatial resolution and planar sensitivity. Similarly, variations were observed for tests specific to whole-body systems and SPECT systems. Most sites checked daily and periodic QC results against pass/fail criteria set by vendors. Additional analyses of the QC results, including trend analysis and periodic reviews, were not common practice. The lack of regulatory requirements is likely to have led to variations in QC tests that are generally either harder to perform or are more labour intensive.

2.
Phys Eng Sci Med ; 43(3): 765-779, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32662037

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 has led to preparations within our hospital for an expected surge of patients. This included developing a technique to perform mobile chest X-ray imaging through glass, allowing the X-ray unit to remain outside of the patient's room, effectively reducing the cleaning time associated with disinfecting equipment. The technique also reduced the infection risk of radiographers. We assessed the attenuation of different types of glass in the hospital and the technique parameters required to account for the glass filtration and additional source to image distance (SID). Radiation measurements were undertaken in a simulated set-up to determine the appropriate position for staff inside and outside the room to ensure occupational doses were kept as low as reasonably achievable. Image quality was scored and technical parameter information collated. The alternative to imaging through glass is the standard portable chest X-ray within the room. The radiation safety requirements for this standard technique were also assessed. Image quality was found to be acceptable or borderline in 90% of the images taken through glass and the average patient dose was 0.02 millisieverts (mSv) per image. The majority (67%) of images were acquired at 110 kV, with an average 5.5 mAs and with SID ranging from 180 to 300 cm. With staff positioned at greater than 1 m from the patient and at more than 1 m laterally from the tube head outside the room to minimise scatter exposure, air kerma values did not exceed 0.5 microgray (µGy) per image. This method has been implemented successfully.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Infection Control , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Radiography, Thoracic , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Glass , Humans , Infection Control/instrumentation , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/standards , Occupational Health/standards , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Radiography, Thoracic/instrumentation , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Radiography, Thoracic/standards , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Radiology Department, Hospital/standards , SARS-CoV-2
3.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 34(4): 498-504, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22711912

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The teenage booster of tetanus/diphtheria/polio vaccine is the final dose in the routine UK childhood schedule. It has the lowest uptake of all childhood vaccines in Wales and no Health Board (HB) has achieved 95% uptake. We examined the services used to deliver this vaccine across Wales in order to determine how to improve the national uptake rate. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of the systems used to deliver the vaccine in the 7 HBs in Wales and their 22 constituent local authorities. Routinely published quarterly and annual COVER report uptake data for each HB were used to compare system effectiveness. RESULTS: The vaccine was either offered in school, in general practice or in both settings. Higher uptake rates were achieved with greater consistency in schools (76-81%) compared with general practice (5-74%), and when coordinated by the HB. When an option was available, most parents chose for their child to be vaccinated in school. CONCLUSIONS: Higher uptake rates of the teenage booster were observed when it was given in school compared with general practice. The findings suggest that offering the teenage booster in schools in all areas of Wales may improve vaccine uptake.


Subject(s)
Diphtheria-Tetanus Vaccine/administration & dosage , Immunization, Secondary/statistics & numerical data , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diphtheria-Tetanus Vaccine/immunology , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/immunology , School Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Wales
4.
Phys Med Biol ; 57(10): 2969-80, 2012 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22517054

ABSTRACT

The dose for image-based motion monitoring of prostate tumours during radiotherapy delivery has not been established. This study aimed to provide quantitative analysis and optimization of the fluoroscopic patient imaging dose during radiotherapy for IMRT and VMAT treatments using standard and hypofractionated treatment schedules. Twenty-two patients with type T1c N0/M0 prostate cancer and three implanted fiducial markers were considered. Minimum field sizes encompassing all fiducial markers plus a 7.5 mm motion margin were determined for each treatment beam, each patient and the complete cohort. Imaging doses were measured for different field sizes and depths in a phantom at 75 and 120 kV. Based on these measurements, the patient imaging doses were then estimated according to beam-on time for clinical settings. The population minimum field size was 5.3 × 6.1 cm², yielding doses of 406 and 185 mGy over the course of an IMRT treatment for 75 kV (10 mAs) and 120 kV (1.04 mAs) imaging respectively, at 1 Hz. The imaging dose was reduced by an average of 28% and 32% by adopting patient-specific and treatment-beam-specific field sizes respectively. Standard fractionation VMAT imaging doses were 37% lower than IMRT doses over a complete treatment. Hypofractionated IMRT stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and VMAT SBRT imaging doses were 58% and 76% lower than IMRT doses respectively. The patient dose for kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring of the prostate was quantified. Tailoring imaging field sizes to specific patients yielded a significant reduction in the imaging dose, as did adoption of faster treatment modalities such as VMAT.


Subject(s)
Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Fluoroscopy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Dosage , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Cohort Studies , Humans , Male , Movement , Phantoms, Imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/physiopathology , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...