Why are neurosurgeons sued? A single-center, half-decade review.

Purpose:The burden of medicolegal claims in neurosurgery is increasing in the UK. Trepidation associated with malpractice claims has the potential to negatively impact surgical practice and patient safety. What are the causes of these claims and can we address them? The aim of this study was to identify the incidence and total burden of litigation claims related to neurosurgery in a London tertiary center.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive cases of claims in neurosurgery that were reported to NHSR between March 2013 and April 2018 by St George's Hospital legal department. This was an extension of previous study by Mukherjee et al., who studied the medicolegal claims in our institution in the preceding 9-year period (2004-2013).Results:There were 18 litigation claims against neurosurgery. Claims were reviewed for clinical event, cause, likelihood of pay-out and legal outcome. Eleven claims were settled in court and seven were settled without court proceeding. All claims were spinal cases, 56% emergency admissions. Causes included faulty surgical technique (39%), delayed treatment (33%), delayed diagnosis/misdiagnosis (17%), and lack of information (11%) with a likelihood of financial success of 43%, 67%, 33%, and 100%, respectively. The highest median pay-outs were for lack of information (£2.8 million) and faulty surgical technique (£1 million). When compared to the preceding 9-year period, there a modest reduction in claims per year, despite an increase in workload. Distribution of litigation causes remained similar but overall financial burden was higher.Conclusion:Spinal surgery has the highest malpractice claim risk in neurosurgical practice. Our review shows that faulty surgical technique is the leading cause of neurosurgical claims. Claims against lack of information, although less frequent, resulted in the highest median pay-out. This study reinforces previously published data that good surgical technique and thorough process of informed consent may reduce litigation in neurosurgery.

Thoracic Arachnoid Cyst Made Symptomatic by Demyelination.

Spinal arachnoid cysts are uncommon distinct pouches of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or CSF-like fluid found adjacent to normal CSF spaces commonly extradural and rarely intradural. They are usually asymptomatic and discovered incidentally. We present a patient with rapid upper motor neuron neurologic deterioration over the course of 1 week. Findings on magnetic resonance imaging revealed various central nervous system demyelination lesions and thoracic arachnoid cyst with cord compression. This acute presentation, in the absence of trauma, is not in favor of the natural history of the intradural thoracic arachnoid cysts. The patient's sensory, gait, and lower limb neurologic deficits improved after surgery with residual mild but stable upper limb deficits. Our patient likely had a static compensated cyst made symptomatic by demyelination as an additional central nervous system lesion.