Cloning and Sequencing Eukaryotic Small RNAs.

Small RNAs are ubiquitous regulators of gene expression that participate in nearly all aspects of physiology in a wide range of organisms. There are many different classes of eukaryotic small RNAs that play regulatory roles at every level of gene expression, including transcription, RNA stability, and translation. While eukaryotic small RNAs display diverse functions across and within classes, they are generally grouped functionally based on the machinery required for their biogenesis, the effector proteins they associate with, and their molecular characteristics. The development of techniques to clone and sequence small RNAs has been critical for their identification, yet the ligation-dependent addition of RNA adapters and the use of reverse transcriptase to generate cDNA in traditional library preparation protocols can be unsuitable to detect certain small RNA subtypes. In particular, 3' or 5' chemical modifications that are characteristic of specific types of small RNAs can impede the ligation-dependent addition of RNA adapters, while internal RNA modifications can interfere with accurate reverse transcription. The inability to clone certain small RNA subtypes with traditional protocols results in an inaccurate assessment of small RNA abundance and diversity, where some RNAs appear over-represented and others are not detected. This overview aims to guide users on how to design small RNA cloning workflows in eukaryotes to more accurately capture specific small RNAs of interest. Hence, we discuss the molecular biology underlying the identification and quantitation of small RNAs, explore the limitations of commonly used protocols, and detail the alternative approaches that can be used to enrich specific small RNA classes. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Chromosome territory formation attenuates the translocation potential of cells.

The formation and spatial arrangement of chromosome territories (CTs) in interphase has been posited to influence the outcome and frequency of genomic translocations. This is supported by correlations between the frequency of inter-chromosomal contacts and translocation events in myriad systems. However, it remains unclear if CT formation itself influences the translocation potential of cells. We address this question in Drosophila cells by modulating the level of Condensin II, which regulates CT organization. Using whole-chromosome Oligopaints to identify genomic rearrangements, we find that increased contact frequencies between chromosomes due to Condensin II knockdown leads to an increased propensity to form translocations following DNA damage. Moreover, Condensin II over-expression is sufficient to drive spatial separation of CTs and attenuate the translocation potential of cells. Together, these results provide the first causal evidence that proper CT formation can protect the genome from potentially deleterious translocations in the presence of DNA damage.