Routines and rituals: a grounded theory of the pain management of drug users in acute care settings.

AIM: This study reviewed the perceptions and strategies of drug users and nurses with regard to pain management in acute care settings. BACKGROUND: Drug users present unique challenges in acute care settings with pain management noted to be at best suboptimal, at worst non-existent. Little is known about why and specifically how therapeutic effectiveness is compromised. DESIGN: Qualitative: constructivist grounded theory. METHOD: A constructivist grounded theory approach incorporating a constant comparative method of data collection and analysis was applied. The data corpus comprised interviews with drug users (n = 11) and five focus groups (n = 22) of nurses and recovering drug users. RESULTS: Moral relativism as the core category both represents the phenomenon and explains the basic social process. Nurses and drug users struggle with moral relativism when addressing the issue of pain management in the acute care setting. Drug users lay claim to expectations of compassionate care and moralise via narration. Paradoxically, nurses report that the caring ideal and mutuality of caring are diminished. Drug users' individual sensitivities, anxieties and felt stigma in conjunction with opioid-induced hyperalgesia complicate the processes. Nurses' and hospitals' organisational routines challenge drug user rituals and vice versa leading both protagonists to become disaffected. Consequently, key clinical issues such as preventing withdrawal and managing pain are left unaddressed and therapeutic effectiveness is compromised. CONCLUSION: This study provides a robust account of nurses' and drug users' struggle with pain management in the acute care setting. Quick technological fixes such as urine screens, checklists or the transient effects of (cognitive-based) education (or training) are not the answer. This study highlights the need for nurses to engage meaningfully with this perceptibly 'difficult' group of patients. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The key aspects likely to contribute to problematic interactions with this patient cohort are outlined so that they can be prevented and, or addressed.

Analysis of the premalignant stages of Barrett's oesophagus through to adenocarcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization.

OBJECTIVES: Barrett's oesophagus is a pre-neoplastic lesion, which develops as a complication of chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and predisposes the patient to oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Our aim was to characterize karyotypic changes that may occur during the progression of Barrett's metaplasia through low-grade dysplasia and high-grade dysplasia to adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The technique of comparative genomic hybridization was used to characterize genome-wide changes in biopsies from patients with low-grade dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia plus high-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. Both fresh and archival material was examined. RESULTS: Comparative genomic hybridization revealed a large amount of widespread chromosome instability at the high-grade dysplasia stage. No significant chromosome changes were detectable by comparative genomic hybridization in patients with low-grade dysplasia. Karyotypic changes in the adenocarcinoma patients were more specific than those found in the high-grade dysplasia patients. Chromosome 4 was amplified most often in high-grade dysplasia and chromosome 8q was amplified most frequently in the adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that high-grade dysplasia is the stage exhibiting widespread chromosome instability, which is detectable by comparative genomic hybridization. This instability is undetectable in low-grade dysplasia. The chromosome variation seen at high-grade dysplasia may be the source of more specific karyotypes that progress to adenocarcinoma. Importantly, we have identified chromosome 4 amplification as being heavily involved in the initiation of Barrett's progression. Specific chromosome changes (4 and 8q) may represent important regions on which to focus attention in future studies, with a view to identifying diagnostic markers.