Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 9(6): e97546, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24905099

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus necrotizing pneumonia is a life-threatening disease. Panton Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) has been associated with necrotizing pneumonia. PVL triggers inflammasome activation in human macrophages leading to IL-1ß release. IL-1ß activates lung epithelial cells to release IL-8. This study aimed to assess the relevance of this inflammatory cascade in vivo and to test the potential of an IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra/Kineret) to decrease inflammation-mediated lung injury. METHODS: We used the sequential instillation of Heat-killed S. aureus and PVL or S. aureus infection to trigger necrotizing pneumonia in rabbits. In these models, we investigated inflammation in the presence or absence of IL-1Ra/Kineret. RESULTS: We demonstrated that the presence of PVL was associated with IL-1ß and IL-8 release in the lung. During PVL-mediated sterile pneumonia, Kineret/IL-1Ra reduced IL-8 production indicating the relevance of the PVL/IL-1/IL-8 cascade in vivo and the potential of Kineret/IL-1Ra to reduce lung inflammation. However, Kineret/IL-1Ra was ineffective in blocking IL-8 production during infection with S. aureus. Furthermore, treatment with Kineret increased the bacterial burden in the lung. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate PVL-dependent inflammasome activation during S.aureus pneumonia, indicate that IL-1 signaling controls bacterial burden in the lung and suggest that therapy aimed at targeting this pathway might be deleterious during pneumonia.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Toxins/toxicity , Exotoxins/toxicity , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein/pharmacology , Interleukin-1beta/metabolism , Interleukin-8/metabolism , Leukocidins/toxicity , Pneumonia, Staphylococcal/drug therapy , Animals , Inflammasomes/drug effects , Inflammasomes/immunology , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein/therapeutic use , Macrophages/drug effects , Macrophages/immunology , Pneumonia, Staphylococcal/etiology , Pneumonia, Staphylococcal/metabolism , Rabbits
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 58(4): 1855-61, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24395236

ABSTRACT

Ceftaroline, the active metabolite of the prodrug ceftaroline fosamil, is a cephalosporin with broad-spectrum in vitro activity against Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (MDRSP), and common Gram-negative pathogens. This study investigated the in vivo activity of ceftaroline fosamil compared with clindamycin, linezolid, and vancomycin in a severe pneumonia model due to MRSA-producing Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL). A USA300 PVL-positive clone was used to induce pneumonia in rabbits. Infected rabbits were randomly assigned to no treatment or simulated human-equivalent dosing with ceftaroline fosamil, clindamycin, linezolid, or vancomycin. Residual bacterial concentrations in the lungs and spleen were assessed after 48 h of treatment. PVL expression was measured using a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Ceftaroline, clindamycin, and linezolid considerably reduced mortality rates compared with the control, whereas vancomycin did not. Pulmonary and splenic bacterial titers and PVL concentrations were greatly reduced by ceftaroline, clindamycin, and linezolid. Ceftaroline, clindamycin, and linezolid were associated with reduced pulmonary tissue damage based on significantly lower macroscopic scores. Ceftaroline fosamil, clindamycin, and, to a lesser extent, linezolid were efficient in reducing bacterial titers in both the lungs and spleen and decreasing macroscopic scores and PVL production compared with the control.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Toxins/metabolism , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Exotoxins/metabolism , Leukocidins/metabolism , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/metabolism , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Animals , Male , Rabbits , Ceftaroline
3.
Anesthesiology ; 118(5): 1150-9, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23416383

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prone position (PP) has proven beneficial in patients with severe lung injury subjected to mechanical ventilation (MV), especially in those with lobar involvement. We assessed the impact of PP on unilateral pneumonia in rabbits subjected to MV. METHODS: After endobronchial challenge with Enterobacter aerogenes, adult rabbits were subjected to either "adverse" (peak inspiratory pressure = 30 cm H2O, zero end-expiratory pressure; n = 10) or "protective" (tidal volume = 8 ml/kg, 5 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure; n = 10) MV and then randomly kept supine or turned to the PP. Pneumonia was assessed 8 h later. Data are presented as median (interquartile range). RESULTS: Compared with the supine position, PP was associated with significantly lower bacterial concentrations within the infected lung, even if a "protective" MV was applied (5.93 [0.34] vs. 6.66 [0.86] log10 cfu/g, respectively; P = 0.008). Bacterial concentrations in the spleen were also decreased by the PP if the "adverse" MV was used (3.62 [1.74] vs. 6.55 [3.67] log10 cfu/g, respectively; P = 0.038). In addition, the noninfected lung was less severely injured in the PP group. Finally, lung and systemic inflammation as assessed through interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α measurement was attenuated by the PP. CONCLUSIONS: The PP could be protective if the host is subjected to MV and unilateral bacterial pneumonia. It improves lung injury even if it is utilized after lung injury has occurred and nonprotective ventilation has been administered.


Subject(s)
Pneumonia, Bacterial/physiopathology , Prone Position/physiology , Respiration, Artificial , Animals , Endpoint Determination , Enterobacter aerogenes , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/physiopathology , Hemodynamics/physiology , Inflammation/pathology , Interleukin-8/metabolism , Lung/microbiology , Lung/pathology , Lung Compliance/physiology , Male , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/pathology , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Pulmonary Gas Exchange , Rabbits , Supine Position/physiology , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolism
4.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 55(7): 3557-63, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21576444

ABSTRACT

Ceftaroline (CPT) is a new cephalosporin exhibiting bactericidal activity against Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (MDRSP), as well as common Gram-negative pathogens. This study investigated the in vivo efficacy of a 48-hour simulated human dose regimen of CPT compared with ceftriaxone (CRO) against isolates of S. pneumoniae with different susceptibilities to penicillin in a rabbit pneumonia model. Three S. pneumoniae strains were used: CRO-susceptible penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae (CRO-S PSSP), CRO-susceptible penicillin-intermediate S. pneumoniae (CRO-S PISP), and CRO-resistant penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (CRO-R PRSP). Animals were randomized to the control group (no treatment) (n = 22) or to a group given intravenous (IV) CPT human equivalent (HE) dosage (600 mg/12 h; n = 19) or IV CRO HE dosage (1 g/24 h; n = 19). The total doses needed to achieve the HE dosage were 71 and 82 mg/kg of body weight/24 h for CRO and CPT, respectively. One group of rabbits infected with the CRO-R PRSP strain received intramuscular (IM) administration of CPT (5 or 20 mg/kg twice daily; n = 5 for each). Evaluation of efficacy was based on bacterial counts in the lungs and spleen. For IV CPT and IV CRO, the mean areas under the concentration-time curves from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)s) were 155 and 938 mg · h/liter, respectively, the maximum concentrations in serum (C(max)s) were 20 and 158 mg/liter, respectively, and the minimum concentrations in serum (C(min)s) were 1.3 and 6 mg/liter, respectively. Both agents effectively treated pulmonary infections caused by CRO-S PSSP or CRO-S PISP with complete bacterial eradication in the lungs and spleen after 2 days of treatment. Against PRSP, CPT demonstrated excellent bactericidal activity, reducing bacterial counts in the lungs and spleen by approximately 8 and 4 log units, respectively (P < 0.001); CRO treatment resulted in a 2-log-unit reduction in the bacterial counts in lungs that did not reach statistical significance. Twice-daily IM CPT (5 mg/kg) reduced the bacterial burden by approximately 6 log units in the lungs and 3 log units in the spleen, and the 20-mg/kg dosage effectively eradicated PRSP infection. These findings further validate the in vivo bactericidal activity of CPT against pneumococci.


Subject(s)
Ceftriaxone/administration & dosage , Ceftriaxone/therapeutic use , Cephalosporins/administration & dosage , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Penicillin Resistance/drug effects , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/drug therapy , Streptococcus pneumoniae/drug effects , Streptococcus pneumoniae/pathogenicity , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Ceftriaxone/pharmacokinetics , Cephalosporins/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Rabbits , Ceftaroline
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...