Nonhealing corneal ulcers in cats: 29 cases (1991-1999).

OBJECTIVE: To compare mean healing times after debridement, debridement with grid keratotomy, and superficial keratectomy in cats with nonhealing corneal ulcers. DESIGN: Retrospective study. ANIMALS: 29 cats with 36 nonhealing corneal ulcers. PROCEDURE: Medical records of cats with nonhealing corneal ulcers were reviewed. Signalment, duration of clinical signs, ophthalmic abnormalities, and response to various treatment protocols were recorded. RESULTS: Mean age of affected cats was 7 years, 8 months. Affected breeds included domestic shorthair (17 cats), Persian (9), Himalayan (2), and Siamese (1). Clinical signs were evident for approximately 2 weeks prior to referral. Both eyes were affected in 4 cats. Mean healing time of ulcers treated with superficial debridement was 30 days. Mean healing time of ulcers treated with superficial debridement and grid keratotomy was 42 days. Superficial keratectomy was performed on 2 eyes and resulted in a healing time of 2 weeks. Formation of a corneal sequestrum was evident in 2 of 21 eyes treated with superficial debridement. Formation of a corneal sequestrum was evident in 4 of 13 eyes treated with superficial debridement and grid keratotomy. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Brachycephalic cats appear to be predisposed to developing nonhealing corneal ulcers. The combination of superficial debridement and grid keratotomy did not decrease mean healing time of nonhealing ulcers, compared with superficial debridement alone. Grid keratotomy may predispose cats with corneal ulcers to develop a corneal sequestrum.

Experimental measurements of particle retention efficiency of filters used to prevent contamination in respiratory devices.

OBJECTIVE: Various types of filters have been designed to prevent cross contamination of ventilation and respiratory devices. The aim of this study was to experimentally measure the retention efficiency of four simple filters (antibacterial and antiviral and seven combined filters (antibacterial and antiviral plus heat and water exchangers). SETTING: The respiratory function testing (EFR) central department of a university teaching hospital. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The same aerosol test with a wide range of particle sizes (0.15 to 15 micrometers) was used to compare the retention efficiency of each filter used in various conditions. The particle sizes and the concentration of the aerosol were measured by a laser velocimeter. For all the filters studied, the retention efficiency was found to be higher than 99%. However some of them let large particles let through. CONCLUSION: These data, performed in vitro, should be assessed also by further clinical studies.