Systematic endoscopic staging of mediastinum to guide radiotherapy planning in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (SEISMIC): an international, multicentre, single-arm, clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Systematic mediastinal lymph node staging by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) improves accuracy of staging in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, patients with locally advanced NSCLC commonly undergo only selective lymph node sampling. This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients with locally advanced NSCLC in whom systematic endoscopic mediastinal staging identified PET-occult lymph node metastases, and to describe the consequences of PET-occult disease on radiotherapy planning. METHODS: This prospective, international, multicentre, single-arm, international study was conducted at seven tertiary lung cancer centres in four countries (Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, and the USA). Patients aged 18 years or older with suspected or known locally advanced NSCLC underwent systematic endoscopic mediastinal lymph node staging before combination chemoradiotherapy or high-dose palliative radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with PET-occult mediastinal lymph node metastases shown following systematic endoscopic staging. The study was prospectively registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000333314. FINDINGS: From Jan 30, 2018, to March 23, 2022, 155 patients underwent systematic endoscopic mediastinal lymph node staging and were eligible for analysis. 58 (37%) of patients were female and 97 (63%) were male. Discrepancy in extent of mediastinal disease identified by PET and EBUS-TBNA was observed in 57 (37% [95% CI 29-44]) patients. PET-occult lymph node metastases were identified in 18 (12% [7-17]) participants, including 16 (13% [7-19]) of 123 participants with clinical stage IIIA or cN2 NSCLC. Contralateral PET-occult N3 disease was identified in nine (7% [2-12]) of 128 participants staged cN0, cN1, or cN2. Identification of PET-occult disease resulted in clinically significant changes to treatment in all 18 patients. In silico dosimetry studies showed the median volume of PET-occult lymph nodes receiving the prescription dose of 60 Gy was only 10·1% (IQR 0·1-52·3). No serious adverse events following endoscopic staging were reported. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggests that systematic endoscopic mediastinal staging in patients with locally advanced or unresectable NSCLC is more accurate than PET alone in defining extent of mediastinal involvement. Standard guideline-recommended PET-based radiotherapy planning results in suboptimal tumour coverage. Our findings indicate that systematic endoscopic staging should be routinely performed in patients with locally advanced NSCLC being considered for radiotherapy to accurately inform radiation planning and treatment decision making in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. FUNDING: None.

Using the Endoscope for Endobronchial Ultrasound in the Esophagus.

EUS-B is a procedure using the echoendobronchoscope in the esophagus and stomach. The procedure is a minimally invasive, safe, and feasible approach that pulmonologists can use to visualize and biopsy structures adjacent to the esophagus and stomach. EUS-B gives access to many structures of which some may also be reached by EBUS (mediastinal lymph nodes, lung or pleural tumors, pericardial fluid) while others cannot be reached such as retroperitoneal lymph nodes, ascites, and lesions in the liver, pancreas or left adrenal gland. The procedure is a pulmonologist- and patient- friendly version of the gastroenterologists' EUS using the thin EBUS endoscope that the pulmonologist already masters. Thus EUS-B training should be easy and a natural continuation of EBUS. With the patient under conscious sedation and in the supine position, the echoendoscope is introduced either through the nostril or mouth into the oropharynx. Then the patient is encouraged to swallow while the endoscope is slowly bent posteriorly and introduced into the esophagus and stomach. Using the ultrasonic image, the operator identifies the six landmarks by EUS-B and EUS: the left liver lobe, abdominal aorta (with the celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery), left adrenal gland, and mediastinal lymph node stations 7, 4L, and 4R. Biopsies can be taken from suspected lesions under real-time ultrasonographic guidance- fine needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) using a technique similar to that used with EBUS-TBNA. The biopsy order is M1b-M1a-N3-N2-N1-T (M = metastasis, N = lymph node, T = tumor) to avoid iatrogenic upstaging. Pre- and post-procedural observation is similar to that of bronchoscopy. EUS-B is safe and feasible in the hands of experienced interventional pulmonologists and provides a significant expansion of the diagnostic possibilities in providing safe, fast, and thorough diagnosis and staging of lung cancer.

Evidence-based training and certification: the ERS thoracic ultrasound training programme.

Thoracic ultrasound has developed into an integral part of the respiratory physician's diagnostic and therapeutic toolbox, with high diagnostic accuracy for many diseases causing acute or chronic respiratory symptoms. However, it is vitally important that the operator has received the appropriate education and training to ensure a systematic and thorough examination, correct image interpretation, and that they then have the appropriate skills to integrate all the findings for patient benefit. In this review, we present the new European Respiratory Society thoracic ultrasound training programme, including a discussion of curriculum development, its implementation, and trainee evaluation. This programme enables participants to gain competence in thoracic ultrasound through structured, evidence-based training with robustly validated assessments and certification. The training programme consists of three components: an online, theoretical part (part 1), which is accessible all year; a practical course (part 2), with four courses held each year (two online courses and two on-site courses); and an examination (part 3) comprising an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), which is hosted each year at the European Respiratory Society Congress.

The European Respiratory Society led training programme improves self-reported competency and increases the use of thoracic ultrasound.

Thoracic ultrasound has become a well-implemented diagnostic tool for assessment and monitoring of patients with respiratory symptoms or disease. However, ultrasound examinations are user dependent and sufficient competencies are needed. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) hosts a structured and evidence-based training programme in thoracic ultrasound. This study aimed to explore and discuss the self-reported activity and self-reported competency of the participants during the ERS course. Online surveys were sent to the training programme participants before the second part of the course (practical part of the course), and before and 3 months after the third part of the course (final certification exam). A total of 77 participants completed the surveys. The self-reported frequency of thoracic ultrasound examinations increased during the course, and in the final survey more than 90% of the participants used thoracic ultrasound on weekly basis. The self-reported competency (on technical execution of the thoracic ultrasound examination and overall competency) also increased. The ERS thoracic ultrasound training programme forms the basis of broad theoretical knowledge and sufficient practical skills that seem to lead to behavioural changes, whereby a large proportion of the participants implemented ultrasound in their clinical practice.

Systematic endoscopic staging of mediastinum to determine impact on radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer (SEISMIC): protocol for a prospective single arm multicentre interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is established as the preferred method of mediastinal lymph node (LN) staging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Selective (targeted) LN sampling is most commonly performed however studies in early stage NSCLC and locally advanced NSCLC confirm systematic EBUS-TBNA evaluation improves accuracy of mediastinal staging. This study aims to establish the rate of detection of positron emission tomography (PET)-occult LN metastases following systematic LN staging by EBUS-TBNA, and to determine the utility of systematic mediastinal staging for accurate delineation of radiation treatment fields in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis/staging of locally advanced NSCLC will be enrolled in this international multi-centre single arm study. Systematic mediastinal LN evaluation will be performed, with all LN exceeding 6 mm to be sampled by TBNA. Where feasible, endoscopic ultrasound staging (EUS-B) may also be performed. Results of minimally invasive staging will be compared to FDG-PET. The primary end-point is proportion of patients in whom systematic LN staging identified PET-occult NSCLC metastases. Secondary outcome measures include (i) rate of nodal upstaging, (ii) false positive rate of PET for mediastinal LN assessment, (iii) analysis of clinicoradiologic risk factors for presence of PET-occult LN metastases, (iv) impact of systematic LN staging in patients with discrepant findings on PET and EBUS-TBNA on target coverage and dose to organs at risk (OAR) in patients undergoing radiotherapy. DISCUSSION: With specificity of PET of 90%, guidelines recommend tissue confirmation of positive mediastinal LN to ensure potentially early stage patients are not erroneously denied potentially curative resection. However, while confirmation of pathologic LN is routinely sought, the exact extent of mediastinal LN involvement in NSCLC in patient with Stage III NSCLC is rarely established. Studies examining systematic LN staging in early stage NSCLC report a significant discordance between PET and EBUS-TBNA. In patients with locally advanced disease this has significant implications for radiation field planning, with risk of geographic miss in the event of PET-occult mediastinal LN metastases. The SEISMIC study will examine both diagnostic outcomes following systematic LN staging with EBUS-TBNA, and impact on radiation treatment planning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12617000333314, ANZCTR, Registered on 3 March 2017.

EBUS versus EUS-B for diagnosing sarcoidosis: The International Sarcoidosis Assessment (ISA) randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Endosonography with intrathoracic nodal sampling is proposed as the single test with the highest granuloma detection rate in suspected sarcoidosis stage I/II. However, most studies have been performed in limited geographical regions. Studies suggest that oesophageal endosonographic nodal sampling has higher diagnostic yield than endobronchial endosonographic nodal sampling, but a head-to-head comparison of both routes has never been performed. METHODS: Global (14 hospitals, nine countries, four continents) randomized clinical trial was conducted in consecutive patients with suspected sarcoidosis stage I/II presenting between May 2015 and August 2017. Using an endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) scope, patients were randomized to EBUS or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-B-guided nodal sampling, and to 22- or 25-G ProCore needle aspiration (2 × 2 factorial design). Granuloma detection rate was the primary study endpoint. Final diagnosis was based on cytology/pathology outcomes and clinical/radiological follow-up at 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 358 patients were randomized: 185 patients to EBUS-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and 173 to EUS-B-fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Final diagnosis was sarcoidosis in 306 patients (86%). Granuloma detection rate was 70% (130/185; 95% CI, 63-76) for EBUS-TBNA and 68% (118/173; 95% CI, 61-75) for EUS-B-FNA (p = 0.67). Sensitivity for diagnosing sarcoidosis was 78% (129/165; 95% CI, 71-84) for EBUS-TBNA and 82% (115/141; 95% CI, 74-87) for EUS-B-FNA (p = 0.46). There was no significant difference between the two needle types in granuloma detection rate or sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Granuloma detection rate of mediastinal/hilar nodes by endosonography in patients with suspected sarcoidosis stage I/II is high and similar for EBUS and EUS-B. These findings imply that both diagnostic tests can be safely and universally used in suspected sarcoidosis patients.

Endobronchial ultrasound for T4 staging in patients with resectable NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: In lung cancer patients, accurate assessment of mediastinal and vascular tumor invasion (stage T4) is crucial for optimal treatment allocation and to prevent unnecessary thoracotomies. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of linear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) for T4-status in patients with centrally located lung cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective study among consecutive patients who underwent EBUS for diagnosis and staging of lung cancer in four hospitals in The Netherlands (Amsterdam, Leiden), Italy (Bologna) and Poland (Zakopane) between 04-2012 and 04-2019. Patients were included if the primary tumor was detected by EBUS and subsequent surgical-pathological staging was performed, which served as the reference standard. T4-status was extracted from EBUS and pathology reports. Chest CT's were re-reviewed for T4-status. RESULTS: 104 patients with lung cancer in whom EBUS detected the primary tumour, and who underwent subsequent surgical-pathological staging were included. 36 patients (35 %) had T4-status, based on vascular (n = 17), mediastinal (n = 15), both vascular and mediastinal (n = 3), or oesophageal invasion (n = 1). For EBUS, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for T4-status were (n = 104): 63.9 % (95 %CI 46.2-79.2 %), 92.6 % (83.7-97.6 %), 82.1 % (65.6-91.7 %), and 82.9 % (75.7-88.2 %), respectively. For chest CT (n = 72): 61.5 % (95 %CI 40.6-79.8 %), 37.0 % (23.2-52.5 %), 35.6 % (27.5-44.6 %), and 63.0 % (47.9-75.9 %), respectively. When combining CT and EBUS with concordant T4 status (n = 33): 90.9 % (95 %CI 58.7-99.8 %), 77.3 % (54.6-92.20 %), 66.7 % (47.5-81.6 %), and 94.4 % (721-99.1%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Both EBUS and CT alone are inaccurate for assessing T4-status as standalone test. However, combining a negative EBUS with a negative CT may rule out T4-status with high certainty.

Endobronchial Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Centrally Located Lung Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Obtaining a tissue diagnosis of centrally located lung tumors in patients presenting without endobronchial abnormalities is challenging, and therefore a considerable diagnostic problem. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of linear endobronchial ultrasound guided-transbronchial-needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for the diagnosis of centrally located lung tumors. METHODS: We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO, CRD42017080968) and searched MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS Previews, and Web of Science till November 18, 2018 for studies that evaluated the yield and/or sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA for diagnosing centrally located lung tumors. We assessed the study quality using QUADAS-2 and performed random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 5,657 manuscripts were identified; of these 14 were considered for the study, including 1,175 patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for diagnosing an intrapulmonary tumor. All studies had a high risk of bias or applicability concerns, predominately regarding patient selection. The average yield of EBUS-TBNA for diagnosing centrally located lung tumors was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.92) and average sensitivity for diagnosing malignant tumors was 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.94). Among studies reporting this information, EBUS-related complications occurred in 5.4% of patients (42/721). CONCLUSION: EBUS-TBNA has a high yield and sensitivity for diagnosing centrally located lung tumors and is safe in selected patients. Prospective studies are recommended to evaluate the routine use of this procedure for diagnosing intrapulmonary tumors.

Systematic and combined endosonographic staging of lung cancer (SCORE study).

Guidelines recommend endosonography for mediastinal nodal staging in patients with resectable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We hypothesise that a systematic endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) evaluation combined with an oesophageal investigation using the same EBUS bronchoscope (EUS-B) improves mediastinal nodal staging versus the current practice of targeted positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT)-guided EBUS staging alone.A prospective, multicentre, international study (NCT02014324) was conducted in consecutive patients with (suspected) resectable NSCLC. After PET-CT, patients underwent systematic EBUS and EUS-B. Node(s) suspicious on CT, PET, EBUS and/or EUS-B imaging and station 4R, 4L and 7 (short axis ≥8 mm) were sampled. For patients without N2/N3 disease determined on endosonography, surgical-pathological staging was the reference standard.229 patients were included in this study. The prevalence of N2/N3 disease was 103 out of 229 patients (45%). A PET-CT-guided targeted approach by EBUS identified 75 patients with N2/N3 disease (sensitivity 73%, 95% CI 63-81%; negative predictive value (NPV) 81%, 95% CI 74-87%). Four additional patients with N2/N3 disease were found by systematic EBUS (sensitivity 77%, 95% CI 67-84%; NPV 84%, 95% CI 76-89%) and five more by EUS-B (84 patients total; sensitivity 82%, 95% CI 72-88%; NPV 87%, 95% CI 80-91%). Additional clinical relevant staging information was obtained in 23 out of 229 patients (10%).Systematic EBUS followed by EUS-B increased sensitivity for the detection of N2/N3 disease by 9% compared to PET-CT-targeted EBUS alone.

Esophageal ultrasound (EUS) assessment of T4 status in NSCLC patients.

BACKGROUND: Mediastinal and central large vessels (T4) invasion by lung cancer is often difficult to assess preoperatively due to the limited accuracy of computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest. Esophageal ultrasound (EUS) can visualize the relationship of para-esophageally located lung tumors to surrounding mediastinal structures. AIM: To assess the value of EUS for detecting mediastinal invasion (T4) of centrally located lung tumors. METHODS: Patients who underwent EUS for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer and in whom the primary tumor was detected by EUS and who subsequently underwent surgical- pathological staging (2000-2016) were retrospectively selected from two university hospitals in The Netherlands. T status of the lung tumor was reviewed based on EUS, CT and thoracotomy findings. Surgical- pathological staging was the reference standard. RESULTS: In 426 patients, a lung malignancy was detected by EUS of which 74 subjects subsequently underwent surgical- pathological staging. 19 patients (26%) were diagnosed with stage T4 based on vascular (n=8, 42%) or mediastinal (n=8, 42%) invasion or both (n=2, 11%), one patient (5%) had vertebral involvement. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for assessing T4 status were: for EUS (n=74); 42%, 95%, 73%, 83%, for chest CT (n=66); 76%, 61%, 41%, 88% and the combination of EUS and chest CT (both positive or negative for T4, (n=34); 83%, 100%, 100% 97%. CONCLUSION: EUS has a high specificity and NPV for the T4 assessment of lung tumors located para-esophageally and offers further value to chest CT scan.

EUS-B-FNA vs conventional EUS-FNA for left adrenal gland analysis in lung cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with lung cancer, left adrenal glands (LAG) suspected for distant metastases (M1b) based on imaging require further evaluation for a definitive diagnosis. Tissue acquisition is regularly performed using conventional EUS-FNA. The aim of this study was to investigate the success rate of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration using the EBUS scope (EUS-B-FNA) for LAG analysis. METHODS: This is a prospective multicenter study in consecutive patients with (suspected) lung cancer and suspected mediastinal and LAG metastases. Following complete mediastinal staging using the EBUS scope (EBUS+EUS-B), the LAG was evaluated and sampled by both EUS-B (experimental procedure) and conventional EUS (current standard of care). RESULTS: The success rate for LAG analysis (visualized, sampled and adequate tissue obtained) was 89% (39/44; 95% CI 76-95%) for EUS-B-FNA, and 93% (41/44; 95%CI 82-98%) for EUS-FNA. In the absence of metastases at EUS-B and/or EUS, surgical verification of the LAG or 6 months clinical and radiological follow-up was obtained, but missing for 5 patients. The prevalence of LAG metastases was 54% (21/39). In patients in whom LAG was seen and sampled, sensitivity for LAG metastases was at least 87% (95%CI 65-97%) for EUS-B, and at least 83% (95%CI 62-95%) for conventional EUS. CONCLUSION: LAG analysis by EUS-B shows a similar high success rate in comparison to conventional EUS. IMPLICATION: Both a mediastinal nodal and LAG evaluation can be adequately performed with just an EBUS scope and single endoscopist. This staging strategy is likely to reduce patient-burden and costs.

Added value of combined endobronchial and oesophageal endosonography for mediastinal nodal staging in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend endosonography with fine-needle aspiration for mediastinal nodal staging in non-small-cell lung cancer, but most do not specify whether this should be through endobronchial endoscopy (EBUS), oesophageal endoscopy (EUS), or both. We assessed the added value and diagnostic accuracy of the combined use of EBUS and EUS. METHODS: For this systematic review and random effects meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS Previews, and Web of Science, without language restrictions, for studies published between Jan 1, 2000, and Feb 25, 2016. We included studies that assessed the accuracy of the combined use of EBUS and EUS in detecting mediastinal nodal metastases (N2/N3 disease) in patients with lung cancer. For each included study, we extracted data on the age and sex of participants, inclusion criteria regarding tumour stage on imaging, details of the endoscopic testing protocol, duration of each endoscopic procedure, number of lymph nodes sampled, serious adverse events occurring during the endoscopic procedures, the reference standard, and 2 × 2 tables for EBUS, EUS, and the combined approach. We evaluated the added value (absolute increase in sensitivity and in detection rate) of the combined use of EBUS and EUS in detecting mediastinal nodal metastases over either test alone, and the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and negative predictive value) of the combined approach. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42015019249. FINDINGS: We identified 2567 unique manuscripts by database search, of which 13 studies (including 2395 patients) were included in the analysis. Median prevalence of N2/N3 disease was 34% (range 23-71). On average, addition of EUS to EBUS increased sensitivity by 0·12 (95% CI 0·08-0·18) and addition of EBUS to EUS increased sensitivity by 0·22 (0·16-0·29). Mean sensitivity of the combined approach was 0·86 (0·81-0·90), and the mean negative predictive value was 0·92 (0·89-0·93). The mean negative predictive value was significantly higher in studies with a prevalence of 34% or less (0·93 [95% CI 0·91-0·95]) compared with studies with a prevalence of more than 34% (0·89 [0·85-0·91]; p=0·013). We found no significant differences in mean sensitivity and negative predictive value between studies that did EBUS first or EUS first, or between studies that used an EBUS-scope or a regular echoendoscope to do EUS. INTERPRETATION: The combined use of EBUS and EUS significantly improves sensitivity in detecting mediastinal nodal metastases, reducing the need for surgical staging procedures. FUNDING: No external funding.

Linear endobronchial and endoesophageal ultrasound: a practice change in thoracic medicine.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Linear endosonography, including intrathoracic lymph nodal sampling by endobronchial ultrasound with transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoesophageal ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), has an important role in the diagnosing and staging of lung cancer. Furthermore, endosonography is applied in the mediastinal evaluation of sarcoidosis, lymphoma, cysts, and nodal metastases of extrathoracic malignancies. Endosonography-related complications as well as sedation and training strategies are discussed. The purpose of this review is to summarize current practice, recent advances, and future directions. RECENT FINDINGS: Lung cancer guidelines recommend endosonography - above mediastinoscopy - as the initial test for mediastinal nodal tissue staging. By introducing the EBUS-scope into the esophagus (EUS-B) - following an EBUS procedure - the complete mediastinum and the left adrenal gland can be investigated in a single scope procedure by one operator. In patients with suspected stage I/II sarcoidosis, EBUS-TBNA/EUS-FNA is the test with the highest granuloma detection rate. Diagnosing (recurrent) lymphoma is an increasingly accepted indication for endosonography. Systematic surveys showed that endosonography has a low complication rate. Simulator-based training and assessment tools measuring competency are important instruments to provide standardized and optimal implementation. SUMMARY: Endosonography is generally accepted as a powerful and safe diagnostic test for various diseases affecting the mediastinum. Large-scale implementation is needed.

Left Adrenal Gland Analysis in Lung Cancer Patients Using the Endobronchial Ultrasound Scope: A Feasibility Trial.

BACKGROUND: In lung cancer patients, the adrenal glands are predilection sites for distant metastases. Esophageal endoscopic ultrasound - fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a minimally invasive and accurate method for left adrenal gland (LAG) analysis but requires a conventional gastrointestinal echoendoscope. Complete endobronchial and esophageal mediastinal nodal staging can be achieved by just a single endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) scope, introducing it into the esophagus (EUS-B) following the endobronchial procedure. Whether the LAG can also be assessed with the EBUS scope is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of identifying the LAG with the EBUS scope. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of lung cancer patients who underwent EBUS and EUS-B for mediastinal staging and LAG assessment between January 2013 and May 2015. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients with (suspected) lung cancer were investigated by the combination of EBUS and EUS-B. In 68 of the 80 patients (85%) in whom an attempt was made to identify the LAG, it was feasible to transgastrically detect the LAG with the EBUS scope. In 9 patients with endosonographic signs of malignant involvement, diagnostic transgastric FNAs were obtained in all. In the 12 patients (15%) in whom the LAG was not detected, the contact between the ultrasound transducer and the gastric wall was suboptimal - the length of the scope was not a limiting factor. CONCLUSIONS: The EBUS scope allows identification of the LAG in the vast majority of lung cancer patients. IMPLICATION: In patients with (suspected) lung cancer, in addition to complete hilar and mediastinal staging, LAG assessment using just a single EBUS scope also seems feasible. Prospective studies are indicated.

Combined endobronchial and esophageal endosonography for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline, in cooperation with the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS).

This is an official guideline of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), produced in cooperation with the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). It addresses the benefit and burden associated with combined endobronchial and esophageal mediastinal nodal staging of lung cancer. The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) approach was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence.The article has been co-published with permission in the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and the European Respiratory Journal. Recommendations 1 For mediastinal nodal staging in patients with suspected or proven non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with abnormal mediastinal and/or hilar nodes at computed tomography (CT) and/or positron emission tomography (PET), endosonography is recommended over surgical staging as the initial procedure (Recommendation grade A). The combination of endobronchial ultrasound with real-time guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic (esophageal) ultrasound with fine needle aspiration, with use of a gastrointestinal (EUS-FNA) or EBUS (EUS-B-FNA) scope, is preferred over either test alone (Recommendation grade C). If the combination of EBUS and EUS-(B) is not available, we suggest that EBUS alone is acceptable (Recommendation grade C).Subsequent surgical staging is recommended, when endosonography does not show malignant nodal involvement (Recommendation grade B). 2 For mediastinal nodal staging in patients with suspected or proven non-small-cell peripheral lung cancer without mediastinal involvement at CT or CT-PET, we suggest that EBUS-TBNA and/or EUS-(B)-FNA should be performed before therapy, provided that one or more of the following conditions is present: (i) enlarged or fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET-avid ipsilateral hilar nodes; (ii) primary tumor without FDG uptake; (iii) tumor size ≥ 3 cm (Fig. 3a - c) (Recommendation grade C). If endosonography does not show malignant nodal involvement, we suggest that mediastinoscopy is considered, especially in suspected N1 disease (Recommendation grade C).If PET is not available and CT does not reveal enlarged hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes, we suggest performance of EBUS-TBNA and/or EUS-(B)-FNA and/or surgical staging (Recommendation grade C). 3 In patients with suspected or proven < 3 cm peripheral NSCLC with normal mediastinal and hilar nodes at CT and/or PET, we suggest initiation of therapy without further mediastinal staging (Recommendation grade C). 4 For mediastinal staging in patients with centrally located suspected or proven NSCLC without mediastinal or hilar involvement at CT and/or CT-PET, we suggest performance of EBUS-TBNA, with or without EUS-(B)-FNA, in preference to surgical staging (Fig. 4) (Recommendation grade D). If endosonography does not show malignant nodal involvement, mediastinoscopy may be considered (Recommendation grade D). 5 For mediastinal nodal restaging following neoadjuvant therapy, EBUS-TBNA and/or EUS-(B)-FNA is suggested for detection of persistent nodal disease, but, if this is negative, subsequent surgical staging is indicated (Recommendation grade C). 6 A complete assessment of mediastinal and hilar nodal stations, and sampling of at least three different mediastinal nodal stations (4 R, 4 L, 7) (Fig. 1, Fig. 5) is suggested in patients with NSCLC and an abnormal mediastinum by CT or CT-PET (Recommendation grade D). 7 For diagnostic purposes, in patients with a centrally located lung tumor that is not visible at conventional bronchoscopy, endosonography is suggested, provided the tumor is located immediately adjacent to the larger airways (EBUS) or esophagus (EUS-(B)) (Recommendation grade D). 8 In patients with a left adrenal gland suspected for distant metastasis we suggest performance of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) (Recommendation grade C), while the use of EUS-B with a transgastric approach is at present experimental (Recommendation grade D). 9 For optimal endosonographic staging of lung cancer, we suggest that individual endoscopists should be trained in both EBUS and EUS-B in order to perform complete endoscopic staging in one session (Recommendation grade D). 10 We suggest that new trainees in endosonography should follow a structured training curriculum consisting of simulation-based training followed by supervised practice on patients (Recommendation grade D). 11 We suggest that competency in EBUS-TBNA and EUS-(B)-FNA for staging lung cancer be assessed using available validated assessment tools (Recommendation Grade D).

Combined endobronchial and esophageal endosonography for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline, in cooperation with the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS).

This is an official guideline of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), produced in cooperation with the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). It addresses the benefit and burden associated with combined endobronchial and esophageal mediastinal nodal staging of lung cancer. The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) approach was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence.The article has been co-published with permission in Endoscopy and the European Respiratory Journal.