ABSTRACT
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to enhance understanding about dignified care from older peoples' and their carers' perspectives. The information will contribute to the development of a tool to measure older peoples' dignity during hospitalisation. BACKGROUND: Older people are a vulnerable cohort at risk of loss of dignity during acute hospitalisation arising from environmental, behavioural and patient factors. It is not clear how older people and their relatives define dignified care in acute care settings. DESIGN: An interpretative descriptive method was used. METHODS: A purposive sample of older people (at least 65 years) who had been hospitalised in acute care and subsequently transferred to sub-acute care, and their relatives, were invited to participate. The study was undertaken in one sub-acute ward in a regional healthcare organisation in Victoria, Australia. Individual interviews were audio-recorded then transcribed. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis. The COREQ checklist was used to document reporting of the study. RESULTS: Individual interviews were conducted: 24 patients and 12 relatives. Three main themes were identified: "Involve me in decisions about my care and treatment," "Keep me safe when I am vulnerable" and "Treat me as an individual and with respect." Older people want to be involved in decisions about their care and treatment and to receive adequate, suitable information. They feel vulnerable during hospitalisation and want to feel safe when speaking up about concerns. Individual acknowledgement is an important aspect of dignity. CONCLUSIONS: Older people and their relatives identified specific elements of care that uphold or threaten dignity during acute hospitalisation. Nurses play a major role in upholding dignity for older people in hospital. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Clinicians may benefit from systematic dignity-related training. Specific strategies to enhance older persons' dignity, including communication skills training and continence management need to be developed, implemented and evaluated.
Subject(s)
Critical Care , Hospitalization , Respect , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Qualitative Research , VictoriaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Faecal incontinence significantly affects a patient's quality of life, and limited research has been conducted into effective interventions that are specific to residential aged care. Australian and New Zealand prevalence data indicate a general faecal incontinence rate of 12-13% in older adults and up to 50% in residential aged care. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to describe the suggested initial investigation and management of faecal incontinence in older adults residing in residential aged care. Discussion of invasive management strategies is outside the scope of this article. DISCUSSION: Faecal incontinence is difficult to treat and there is limited evidence to support any treatment beyond three to six months. However, recognition remains the major barrier to treatment with non-invasive interventions that are available to reduce episode frequency and prevent complications. A combination of exercise programs and integrated continence care in residential aged care may provide significant benefit
if there are sufficient staffing resources available.