A National Survey Identifying the Factors Associated With Cardiovascular Care Nurses' Perceived Knowledge of International Practice Guidelines: The First Step in the Development of an Implementation Strategy.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of international guidelines within everyday practice remains problematic, which can have a detrimental impact on quality of care delivered. This study aimed to ascertain the factors associated with clinical nurses' perceived knowledge of international guidelines. METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey, nurses from 45 hospitals across Ireland were recruited. A previously validated anonymous questionnaire that assessed guideline knowledge, use, and barriers to implementation was used. Data were analyzed using SPSS 23 and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 542 responses, 54% had used international guidelines relevant to their practice and 50% had consulted within the last year. Most nurses perceived that poor patient follow-up, lack of time and resources, poor clinical leadership, workload, long guidelines, and not understanding guideline detail were barriers to guideline use and implementation. Forty-five percent rated their perceived knowledge of guidelines as "low." Logistic regression identified that "high" knowledge levels were significantly associated with having read guidelines in the last year and their use with practice. In contrast, low knowledge of the guidelines was associated with perceptions that they were lengthy and not easy to use, lack of confidence to challenge colleagues when guidelines are not implemented, or not being able to influence current practice. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the specific knowledge needs in this cohort of mainly basic grade registered nurses, with low perceived guideline knowledge. A whole unit or team approach led by nurse champions is needed to develop and establish practice and educational strategies that would increase the availability, application, and knowledge of guidelines within everyday practice.

Influence of radial anatomy on pain experienced during transradial coronary angiography.

BACKGROUND: The transradial route has become the primary approach for coronary angiography with the presence of radial artery anomalies found to be 10-20%. There has been limited study on the influence of these anomalies on procedural pain. Our aims were to determine local prevalence of the high radial origin (HRO) anatomical variant; to investigate factors influencing transradial procedural pain; and to determine if HRO specifically was associated with increased pain. METHODS: Radial artery anatomy was characterized by arteriography in sequential patients undergoing angiography. Patients were asked to mark their perceived procedural pain on a visual analog scale, which was converted to a pain score. RESULTS: 382 patients were enrolled, 5 were excluded. There were 259 males (68.7%) and 118 females (31.3%). HRO was present in 51 patients (13.5%). Overall mean pain score was 2.6 (SD 2.5). HRO was associated with a higher mean pain score than normal anatomy (3.3 (SD 2.9) vs. 2.4 (SD 2.4) p=0.027). HRO was not associated with increased procedural failure, screening time or procedure time. When pain score was dichotomized into mild pain (<4.0) and moderate-to-severe pain (≥4.0), HRO was associated with almost double the frequency of moderate-to-severe pain (37.2% vs. 21.1%, p=0.012). Using a logistic regression model, only female gender, younger age and HRO remained significant predictors of moderate-to-severe pain. CONCLUSIONS: There was significantly increased pain in patients with HRO without increased procedure/screening time or procedural failure. Female gender and younger age were also found to be significant predictors of increased pain.

Would you be a geriatrician? Student career preferences and attitudes to a career in geriatric medicine.

BACKGROUND: career intentions of medical students may impact on education and workforce planning. We sought to determine (i) career choices of senior medical students; (ii) interest in geriatric medicine; (iii) factors influencing such choices; and (iv) the impact of a 6-week Medicine in the Community module. METHODS: cross-sectional survey of all senior UCD medical students, before and after completion of a 'Medicine in the Community' module, 2009-11. RESULTS: eighty-two per cent (274/336) completed the survey at module's end. Two-thirds (174) had chosen a future speciality, most frequently general practice (32.1%) and internal medicine (17%). Half (49.8%) believed career selection is made during medical school. Thirty-one per cent would consider a career in geriatric medicine; reasons cited were interesting field (34.5%), clinical variety (25%) and perception as emotionally rewarding (20.2%). Commonest deterrents were perceived slowness-of-pace and not wanting to work with older patients. Female students (adjusted OR: 1.89, P = 0.05) and those prioritising travel opportunities (adjusted OR: 2.77, P = 0.01) were more likely to consider geriatric medicine. Half (51.5%) reported that the community medicine module increased their interest in geriatric medicine; 91.3% that it would positively influence how they treated older patients. Students reporting a positive influence of the module were more likely to consider a career in geriatric medicine (OR: 1.62, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: two-thirds of students had already chosen a future speciality. One-third would consider geriatric medicine. This may have important implications for workforce planning and development of geriatric medicine. Undergraduate exposure to the discipline may increase interest in geriatric medicine as a career, and positively influence management of older patients.