Reducing blood culture contamination by a simple informational intervention.

Compared to truly negative cultures, false-positive blood cultures not only increase laboratory work but also prolong lengths of patient stay and use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, both of which are likely to increase antibiotic resistance and patient morbidity. The increased patient suffering and surplus costs caused by blood culture contamination motivate substantial measures to decrease the rate of contamination, including the use of dedicated phlebotomy teams. The present study evaluated the effect of a simple informational intervention aimed at reducing blood culture contamination at Skåne University Hospital (SUS), Malmö, Sweden, during 3.5 months, focusing on departments collecting many blood cultures. The main examined outcomes of the study were pre- and postintervention contamination rates, analyzed with a multivariate logistic regression model adjusting for relevant determinants of contamination. A total of 51,264 blood culture sets were drawn from 14,826 patients during the study period (January 2006 to December 2009). The blood culture contamination rate preintervention was 2.59% and decreased to 2.23% postintervention (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.76 to 0.98). A similar decrease in relevant bacterial isolates was not found postintervention. Contamination rates at three auxiliary hospitals did not decrease during the same period. The effect of the intervention on phlebotomists' knowledge of blood culture routines was also evaluated, with a clear increase in level of knowledge among interviewed phlebotomists postintervention. The present study shows that a relatively simple informational intervention can have significant effects on the level of contaminated blood cultures, even in a setting with low rates of contamination where nurses and auxiliary nurses conduct phlebotomies.

Pharmacokinetics of cefepime dihydrochloride arginine in subjects with renal impairment.

In this study, the safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of a single 1-g intravenous dose of cefepime (BMY-28142) were investigated. Twenty-three volunteers with various degrees of renal function were assigned to four trial groups according to glomerular filtration rates (GFR). Group IV consisted of five patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing treatment with hemodialysis. Cefepime concentrations in samples from plasma, urine, and infusion solutions were assayed with high-pressure liquid chromatography. The volume of distribution corresponded to the assumed extracellular fluid volume and did not differ significantly between the four groups. The area under the concentration-time curve increased as renal function decreased; in group II (GFR, 31 to 80 ml/[min x 1.73 m2]; n = 6), it was already three times higher than in group I (GFR, > or = 80 ml/[min x 1.73 m2]; n = 5). Mean residence time was 2.4, 6.8, 11.4, and 31.6 h for the four groups, respectively. Total clearance decreased (97.2, 34.6, 19.8, and 6.3 ml/[min x 1.73 m2]) with decreasing renal function, and a linear relationship between total plasma clearance and GFR was found with the regression equation y = 0.92x-2.0 (r = 0.991). Renal clearance was linearly correlated to GFR with the regression equation y = 0.87x-6.1 (r = 0.989), indicating that renal elimination is mainly by glomerular filtration. During hemodialysis, the extraction ratios were between 0.40 and 0.65. Dialysis clearance varied between 69.9 and 94.6 ml/(min x 1.73 m2).