ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Wounds are invariably dressed postoperatively but the evidence for the timing of dressing changes is limited. This meta-analysis evaluated whether the relative risk of wound infection varies depending on when dressings are changed. METHODS: A frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted on the results of a systematic review of the MEDLINE®, Ovid®, Scopus®, Web of Science™ and PubMed® databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials performed in May 2023. Evidence quality was graded using the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis tool. RESULTS: A total of 4 studies were included with 878 patients. A significant increase in the relative risk of wound infection was found when dressings were left in situ for more than 4.5 days when compared with 48 hours (3.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-8.33). There were no significant differences in the relative risk of infection between the other groups. Model heterogeneity and inconsistency were insignificant (Cochran's Q: 0.44, p=0.51). The quality of the evidence was graded as generally very low and risk of bias evaluations showed it to be of high concern for bias. CONCLUSIONS: Late dressing changes significantly increase the risks of wound infection and changes at 48 hours minimise these risks. There was no advantage demonstrated for earlier dressing changes. Ensuring that dressings are changed appropriately can minimise patient harm and health service costs.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Perianal abscesses are common presentations and reasons for emergency general surgery admissions. Management involves incision and drainage of the abscess and packing the cavity with internal wound dressings. This meta-analysis aimed to assess in adults if packing an abscess or leaving it unpacked leads to a significant difference in the outcomes of pain on wound dressing, time to healing, rate of fistulation and abscess recurrence. METHODS: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with participants aged 18 years or older that compared packing of perianal abscess cavities with no packing between 2002 and 2022 were searched for in December 2022 on OVID Medline and Embase, the CENTRAL register of trials, PubMed and Google Scholar. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted on the data extracted. RESULTS: Three RCTs involving 490 patients were analysed for the outcomes of abscess recurrence and postoperative fistula formation; the data were not adequate to assess pain on dressing and time to healing. For unpacked versus packed, the pooled relative risk of abscess recurrence was 1.57 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.764, 3.29, p=0.219) and for fistula formation 0.686 (95% CI 0.430, 1.09, p=0.114). These results suggest there is no significant benefit to packing abscess cavities. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the outcomes suggests there is no significant difference with regards to rates of abscess recurrence or fistula formation between the packed and unpacked groups; however, appropriately powered RCTs are required in this area to provide more primary evidence to inform best practice and clinical management.
