ABSTRACT
Technical variants of mania and depression models that were based on dominant-submissive relationships (DSR) have been analyzed and compared in the present paper. In these paradigms, one animal of a pair developed the behavioral trait of dominance while the other submissiveness in a food competition test after repeated interactions in a specially designed apparatus. Data collection methods and timelines have been compared in variants of the DSR-based models. In addition, different selection criteria to assign dominant or submissive status to animals and two different scoring systems were evaluated. The importance of the selection criteria for DSR stability has been emphasized. Our data showed that (1) only animals selected with the strict criteria form clear dominant and submissive relationships that hold throughout the study period, (2) submissive animals were influenced by fluoxetine and dominant animals were influenced by sodium valproate similarly in pairs scored by human observer and by a video-tracking system. These studies indicate that the model variant using stringent selection criteria and automatic scoring was the most reliable for use in depression-related studies.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Antimanic Agents/pharmacology , Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Dominance-Subordination , Animals , Behavior, Animal/physiology , Bipolar Disorder/physiopathology , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Depressive Disorder/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Feeding Behavior/physiology , Fluoxetine/pharmacology , Neuropsychological Tests/standards , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Rats, Wistar , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacology , Social Behavior , Valproic Acid/pharmacology , Videotape Recording/methodsABSTRACT
There is confusion in the literature on the measurement of the drug activity onset time (AOT) for both clinical and non-clinical studies of antidepressant and antimanic drugs. The questions asked are: How often and at which time points should drug effects be measured? At what level of a drug effect should AOT be determined? Is the placebo (control) effect important for consideration of drug AOT? This paper reviews approaches taken to answer these questions and to assess drug therapeutic AOT. The first part of the paper is devoted to a review of methods used in clinical trials with depression as an indication. The second part is focused on approaches taken in animal models of depression and how they could help in assessing drug AOT. Finally, a summary of pharmacological values on which the AOT depends is presented and a new statistical approach to data analysis method proposed. The allied experimental design for pre-clinical and clinical studies may help to characterize and differentiate AOT for available and new generation of antidepressants and antimanic drugs.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Antimanic Agents/pharmacology , Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Dominance-Subordination , Reaction Time/drug effects , Animals , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Humans , Time FactorsABSTRACT
N-Phenyl-2-[1-[3-(2-pyridinylethynyl)benzoyl]-4-piperidine]acetamide (9) and related piperidine acetamide derivatives have good oral activity in the elevated plus maze, an animal model predictive of clinical efficacy for the treatment of anxiety. Modest affinity was observed for the neurokinin NK-1 and 2 receptors, which are known to be involved in the regulation of mood and emotion.
Subject(s)
Acetylene/chemistry , Amides/chemistry , Amides/pharmacology , Anti-Anxiety Agents/chemical synthesis , Anti-Anxiety Agents/pharmacology , Amides/chemical synthesis , Animals , Anti-Anxiety Agents/chemistry , CHO Cells , Cricetinae , Humans , Mice , Molecular Structure , Structure-Activity RelationshipABSTRACT
5-ethoxymethyl-7-fluoro-3-oxo-1,2,3,5-tetrahydrobenzo[4,5] imidazo[1,2a]pyridine-4-N-(2-fluorophenyl)carboxamide) (RWJ-51204) binds selectively and with high affinity (K(i) = 0.2-2 nM) to the benzodiazepine site on GABA(A) receptors. Considering the GABA shift, the intrinsic modulatory activity of RWJ-51204 is lower than that of full agonist anxiolytics (lorazepam, diazepam, alprazolam, and clonazepam) but similar to partial agonists (bretazenil, abecarnil, panadiplon, and imidazenil). RWJ-51204 was orally active in anxiolytic efficacy tests; pentylenetetrazole induced seizure inhibition in mice (ED(50) = 0.04 mg/kg), Vogel conflict in rats (ED(50) = 0.36 mg/kg), elevated plus-maze in rats (minimal effective dose = 0.1 mg/kg), and conflict in squirrel monkeys (ED(50) = 0.49 mg/kg). RWJ-51204 attenuated chlordiazepoxide-induced motor impairment in mice. Usually, RWJ-51204 was more potent than reference anxiolytics in rodent efficacy tests but less potent in monkey conflict. Usually, the slope of the dose-response lines for RWJ-51204 was more shallow than the full agonist anxiolytics but steeper than partial agonists in efficacy tests but typically shallow in tests for central nervous system side effects. In monkeys only mild or moderate sedation was observed at doses equivalent to 20 or 40 times the anxiolytic ED(50). RWJ-51204 fits into the partial agonist class of GABA(A) receptor modulators. In conclusion, RWJ-51204 exhibits a profile in in vitro experiments and in animal models, in mice and monkeys (but not in rats), suggesting that it has a profile of anxiolytic activity associated with less sedation, motor impairment, or muscle relaxation than currently available GABA(A) receptor modulators, i.e., the benzodiazepines.
