Neoadjuvant treatment and survival outcomes by pathologic complete response in HER2-negative early breast cancers.

Background: The benefit of pathologic complete response (pCR) in early breast cancer (eBC) is not well described in the real-world setting. This study used the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived deidentified database to describe treatment patterns and survival outcomes by pCR status after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in women with triple-negative or HR+/HER2- eBC. Materials & methods: Observational cohort study analyzing women with eBC who started NAT between 2011 and 2018. Results: 496 women were included in the study; of those, 16.1% achieved pCR, of which 35.7% were triple-negative and 6.1% were HR+/HER2- eBC. More women with triple-negative eBC (95.2%) were exclusively treated with chemotherapy-based NAT versus HR+/HER2- eBC (56.1%). In multivariate analyses from NAT start, not achieving pCR was associated with increased risk of death and progression. Conclusion: pCR status may be a reliable prognostic indicator for survival in these eBC subtypes in the real-world setting.

Response to treatment before surgery indicates better outcomes in breast cancer patients. To understand how well cancer treatments work, patients are compared on their overall survival. This measures the number of people in a study or treatment group who are still alive after a certain amount of time from when they were diagnosed or started treatment. Overall survival shows how well patients are doing in their cancer journey, but it takes time to understand how good treatments are when using this measure. In women with early-stage breast cancer, a quicker way to understand how well patients react to their treatment is called pathologic complete response (pCR). Some people have whole-body treatments such as chemotherapy before surgery (known as neoadjuvant treatment). For these patients, pCR may occur after neoadjuvant treatment, meaning all signs of cancer are gone when they have surgery. In real-life clinical settings, little research has been done to understand how pCR can measure breast cancer survival. In this study, the authors investigate whether women who had a pCR were more or less likely to have their cancer become worse or experience death than those who did not achieve pCR. The health records of 496 women diagnosed with early breast cancer over an eight-year period were assessed. The results show that women who did not have a pCR were more likely to have their cancer become worse or die. This means that pCR could be a better way than overall survival to identify which treatments work well in early breast cancer, and importantly, change the course of a patient's journey.

The Impact of Neighborhood Economic and Racial Inequalities on the Spatial Variation of Breast Cancer Survival in New Jersey.

BACKGROUND: Mapping breast cancer survival can help cancer control programs prioritize efforts with limited resources. We used Bayesian spatial models to identify whether breast cancer survival among patients in New Jersey (NJ) varies spatially after adjusting for key individual (age, stage at diagnosis, molecular subtype, race/ethnicity, marital status, and insurance) and neighborhood measures of poverty and economic inequality [index of concentration at the extremes (ICE)]. METHODS: Survival time was calculated for all NJ women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2010 and 2014 and followed to December 31, 2015 (N = 27,078). Nonlinear geoadditive Bayesian models were used to estimate spatial variation in hazard rates and identify geographic areas of higher risk of death from breast cancer. RESULTS: Significant geographic differences in breast cancer survival were found in NJ. The geographic variation of hazard rates statewide ranged from 0.71 to 1.42 after adjustment for age and stage, and were attenuated after adjustment for additional individual-level factors (0.87-1.15) and neighborhood measures, including poverty (0.9-1.11) and ICE (0.92-1.09). Neighborhood measures were independently associated with breast cancer survival, but we detected slightly stronger associations between breast cancer survival, and the ICE compared to poverty. CONCLUSIONS: The spatial models indicated breast cancer survival disparities are a result of combined individual-level and neighborhood socioeconomic factors. More research is needed to understand the moderating pathways in which neighborhood socioeconomic status influences breast cancer survival. IMPACT: More effective health interventions aimed at improving breast cancer survival could be developed if geographic variation were examined more routinely in the context of neighborhood socioeconomic inequalities in addition to individual characteristics.

Overview of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Case Investigation of Cervical Cancer Study.

Background: Despite advances in cervical cancer screening, a significant number of women in the United States have not received adequate screening. Studies have suggested that approximately half of the women who developed cervical cancer were not adequately screened. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Case Investigation of Cervical Cancer (CICC) Study took a unique approach to reconstruct the time before a woman's cervical cancer diagnosis and understand the facilitators and barriers to screening and care. This article provides an overview of the study. Methods: This study included all cervical cancer survivors diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer aged 21 years and older in three U.S. states from 2014-2016. The study design consisted of three different data collection methods, including comprehensive registry data, a mailed survey, and medical chart abstraction. This overview compares the characteristics of cervical cancer survivors in the three states by study participation and eligibility status. Results: Registries identified 2,748 women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer. Of these, 1,730 participants were eligible for participation, 28% (n = 481) enrolled in the study and 23% (n = 400) consented to the medical chart abstraction. Conclusion: The CICC Study is unique in that it addresses, with medical record verification, the medical history of woman 5 years before their cervical cancer diagnosis as well as provides information from the woman on her health care behaviors. This study provides data on a general population of cervical cancer survivors in three states that could be used to guide interventions to increase cervical cancer screening.

Trends in colorectal cancer incidence among younger adults-Disparities by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and subsite.

Millennials (ages 18-35) are now the largest living generation in the US, making it important to understand and characterize the rising trend of colorectal cancer incidence in this population, as well as other younger generations of Americans. Data from the New Jersey State Cancer Registry (n = 181 909) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (n = 448 714) were used to analyze invasive CRC incidence trends from 1979 to 2014. Age, sex, race, ethnicity, subsite, and stage differences between younger adults (20-49) and screening age adults (≥50) in New Jersey (NJ) were examined using chi-square; and, we compared secular trends in NJ to the United States (US). Whites, men, and the youngest adults (ages 20-39) are experiencing greater APCs in rectal cancer incidence. Rates among younger black adults, overall, were consistently higher in both NJ and the US over time. When compared to older adults, younger adults with CRC in NJ were more likely to be: diagnosed at the late stage, diagnosed with rectal cancer, male, non-white, and Hispanic. Invasive CRC incidence trends among younger adults were found to vary by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and subsite. Large, case-level, studies are needed to understand the role of genetics, human papillomavirus (HPV), and cultural and behavioral factors in the rise of CRC among younger adults. Provider and public education about CRC risk factors will also be important for preventing and reversing the increasing CRC trend in younger adults.