Effect of Short-term Integrated Palliative Care on Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients Severely Affected With Long-term Neurological Conditions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Palliative care has shown benefits in reducing symptom intensity and quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. However, high-quality evidence to support palliative care policy and service developments for patients with long-term neurological conditions (LTNCs) is lacking. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of a short-term integrated palliative care (SIPC) intervention for people with LTNCs. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, phase 3, randomized clinical trial conducted from April 1, 2015, to November 30, 2017, with a last follow-up date of May 31, 2018, in 7 UK hospitals with both neurology and palliative care services. A total of 535 patients with LTNC were assessed for eligibility and 350 were randomized. Inclusion criteria were patients 18 years or older with any advanced stage of multiple sclerosis, motor neuron disease, idiopathic Parkinson disease multiple system atrophy, or progressive supranuclear palsy. Data were analyzed from November 2018 to March 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 using minimization method to receive SIPC (intervention, n = 176) or standard care (control, n = 174). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was change in 8 key palliative care symptoms from baseline to 12-weeks, measured by the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for neurological conditions. Secondary outcomes included change in the burden of other symptoms, health-related quality of life, caregiver burden, and costs. Data were collected and analyzed blindly by intention to treat. Results: A total of 350 patients (mean [SD] age 67 [12] years; years since diagnosis, 12 [range, 0-56]; 51% men; 49% requiring considerable assistance) with an advanced stage of LTNC were recruited, along with informal caregivers (n = 229). There were no between-group differences in primary outcome (effect size, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.37 to 0.05), any other patient-reported outcomes, adverse events, or survival. Although there was more symptom reduction in the SIPC group in relation to mean change in primary outcome, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (-0.78; 95% CI, -1.29 to -0.26 vs -0.28; 95% CI, -0.82 to 0.26; P = .14). There was a decrease in mean health and social care costs from baseline to 12 weeks -$1367 (95% CI, -$2450 to -$282) in the SIPC group and -653 (95% CI, -$1839 to -$532) in the control group, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = .12). SIPC was perceived by patients and caregivers as building resilience, attending to function and deficits, and enabling caregivers. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, SIPC was not statistically significantly different from standard care for the patient-reported outcomes. However, SIPC was associated with lower cost, and in qualitative analysis was well-received by patients and caregivers, and there were no safety concerns. Further research is warranted. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN18337380.

Randomised, double-blind, multicentre, mixed-methods, dose-escalation feasibility trial of mirtazapine for better treatment of severe breathlessness in advanced lung disease (BETTER-B feasibility).

New treatments are required for severe breathlessness in advanced disease. We conducted a randomised feasibility trial of mirtazapine over 28 days in adults with a modified medical research council breathlessness scale score ≥3. Sixty-four patients were randomised (409 screened), achieving our primary feasibility endpoint of recruitment. Most patients had COPD or interstitial lung disease; 52 (81%) completed the trial. There were no differences between placebo and mirtazapine in tolerability or safety, and blinding was maintained. Worst breathlessness ratings at day 28 (primary clinical activity endpoint) were, 7.1 (SD 2.3, placebo) and 6.3 (SD 1.8, mirtazapine). A phase III trial of mirtazapine is indicated. Trial registration: ISRCTN 32236160; European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT no: 2015-004064-11).

Defining patterns of care in the management of patients with brain metastases in a large oncology centre: A single-centre retrospective audit of 236 cases.

AIMS: The role of selected treatments for brain metastases (BM) is well documented; however, the prevalence of these is not. We report on the patterns of care in the management of BM in a large oncology centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively audited 236 cases of newly diagnosed BM from January 2016 to December 2017 by looking at 2 years of radiology reports and gathered data on primary site, survival, treatment received, palliative care input and brain metastases-related admissions. RESULTS: Eighty-two per cent of cases were related to lung, breast and melanoma primaries. Half of patients received a form of treatment with the other half receiving best supportive care. Of these, whole-brain radiotherapy (39%) and stereotactic radiosurgery (40%) were the most common treatment modalities. Most common reasons for admissions were headaches, seizures, weakness and confusion. CONCLUSION: This is the first study in the UK that gives an in-depth overview of the real-world management of brain metastases. We have demonstrated the prevalence of treatment across the spectrum of brain metastases patients. Radiotherapy is the mainstay of treatment in nearly 80% of cases; however, care needs to be taken in ensuring that SRS is offered to those who are suitable.

Integrating palliative care into neurology services: what do the professionals say?

OBJECTIVES: Evaluations of new services for palliative care in non-cancer conditions are few. OPTCARE Neuro is a multicentre trial evaluating the effectiveness of short-term integrated palliative care (SIPC) for progressive long-term neurological conditions. Here, we present survey results describing the current levels of collaboration between neurology and palliative care services and exploring the views of professionals towards the new SIPC service. METHODS: Neurology and palliative care teams from six UK trial sites (London, Nottingham, Liverpool, Cardiff, Brighton and Chertsey) were approached via email to complete an online survey. The survey was launched in July 2015 and consisted of multiple choice or open comment questions with responses collected using online forms. RESULTS: 33 neurology and 26 palliative care professionals responded. Collaborations between the two specialties were reported as being 'good/excellent' by 36% of neurology and by 58% of palliative care professionals. However, nearly half (45%) of neurology compared with only 12% of palliative care professionals rated current levels as being 'poor/none'. Both professional groups felt that the new SIPC service would influence future collaborations for the better. However, they identified a number of barriers for the new SIPC service such as resources and clinician awareness. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the opportunity to increase collaboration between neurology and palliative care services for people with progressive neurological conditions, and the acceptability of SIPC as a model to support this. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN18337380; Pre-results.

Lung cancer diagnosed following an emergency admission: exploring patient and carer perspectives on delay in seeking help.

PURPOSE: Compared to others, patients diagnosed with lung cancer following an emergency, unplanned admission to hospital (DFEA) have more advanced disease and poorer prognosis. Little is known about DFEA patients' beliefs about cancer and its symptoms or about their help-seeking behaviours prior to admission. METHODS: As part of a larger single-centre, prospective mixed-methods study conducted in one University hospital, we undertook qualitative interviews with patients DFEA and their carers to obtain their understanding of symptoms and experiences of trying to access healthcare services before admission to hospital. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Framework analysis was employed. RESULTS: Thirteen patients and 10 carers plus 3 bereaved carers took part in interviews. Three patient/carer dyads were interviewed together. Participants spoke about their symptoms and why they did not seek help sooner. They described complex and nuanced experiences. Some (n = 12) had what they recalled as the wrong symptoms for lung cancer and attributed them either to a pre-existing condition or to ageing. In other cases (n = 9), patients or carers realised with hindsight that their symptoms were signs of lung cancer, but at the time had made other attributions to account for them. In some cases (n = 3), a sudden onset of symptoms was reported. Some GPs (n = 6) were also reported to have made incorrect attributions about cause. CONCLUSION: Late diagnosis meant that patients DFEA needed palliative support sooner after diagnosis than patients not DFEA. Professionals and lay people interpret health and illness experiences differently.

Is clarithromycin a potential treatment for cachexia in people with lung cancer? A feasibility study.

Clarithromycin may improve cachexia and survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but adequately controlled data are lacking. This study was undertaken primarily to inform the feasibility and scale of a phase III trial. Eligible consenting patients with stage IV NSCLC and cachexia were to be randomized to receive either clarithromycin 250mg twice daily or placebo for eight weeks. Aspects of trial feasibility recorded included numbers eligible, approached and recruited, together with adherence and completion of treatment and assessments. Over 6 months, none of 125 patients identified fulfilled the entry criteria. The commonest reasons for ineligibility were the use of an excluded concurrent drug (45, 36%), brain metastases (22, 18%), poor performance status (21, 17%) and current chemotherapy (15, 12%). A phase III trial of clarithromycin using these entry criteria is not feasible in this setting. Other macrolides that have a lower risk of a drug-drug interaction may be more practical to pursue.

Can body composition be used to optimize the dose of platinum chemotherapy in lung cancer? A feasibility study.

PURPOSE: Current methods of dosing platinum-based chemotherapy are suboptimal. Potentially, taking lean body mass into account may help. To inform the design of a future study, we first examined the feasibility and acceptability of such an approach using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and explored aspects suggestive of over- and under-dosing. METHODS: Patients with lung cancer offered platinum-based chemotherapy over 1 year were identified and, if eligible, invited to take part in a prospective feasibility study. Questionnaires examined acceptability of the DEXA scan and of a future study that randomized between traditional dosing and one adjusted according to body composition. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and a lack of neutropenia explored potential over- and under-dosing, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 173 patients offered chemotherapy, 123 (71%) were ineligible, mostly because of failing entry criteria (84, 49%). Of the 50 approached, 18 (36%) participated, most receiving carboplatin, with 17 providing data. All found a DEXA scan acceptable; other assessments were fully completed, except nadir and pre-chemotherapy blood counts. Most (94%) were prepared to take part in a future study, although the additional hospital visits for a nadir blood count were unpopular with some. Five (29%) patients experienced six episodes of DLT which resulted in discontinuation (3), dose reduction (2) or change to a less toxic regimen (1). Nine (60%) patients experienced either no (2) or inconsistent (7) neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: A randomized trial appears acceptable and feasible in patients receiving carboplatin. Adjustment of our entry criteria and avoiding a hospital visit for a nadir blood count should aid recruitment.

Psychometric Properties of a Generic, Patient-Centred Palliative Care Outcome Measure of Symptom Burden for People with Progressive Long Term Neurological Conditions.

BACKGROUND: There is no standard palliative care outcome measure for people with progressive long term neurological conditions (LTNC). This study aims to determine the psychometric properties of a new 8-item palliative care outcome scale of symptom burden (IPOS Neuro-S8) in this population. DATA AND METHODS: Data were merged from a Phase II palliative care intervention study in multiple sclerosis (MS) and a longitudinal observational study in idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD), multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). The IPOS Neuro-S8 was assessed for its data quality, score distribution, ceiling and floor effects, reliability, factor structure, convergent and discriminant validity, concurrent validity with generic (Palliative care Outcome Scale) and condition specific measures (Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale; Non-motor Symptoms Questionnaire; Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire), responsiveness and minimally clinically important difference. RESULTS: Of the 134 participants, MS patients had a mean Extended Disability Status Scale score 7.8 (SD = 1.0), patients with an IPD, MSA or PSP were in Hoehn & Yahr stage 3-5. The IPOS Neuro-S8 had high data quality (2% missing), mean score 8 (SD = 5; range 0-32), no ceiling effects, borderline floor effects, good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.7) and moderate test-retest reliability (intraclass coefficient = 0.6). The results supported a moderately correlated two-factor structure (Pearson's r = 0.5). It was moderately correlated with generic and condition specific measures (Pearson's r: 0.5-0.6). There was some evidence for discriminant validity in IPD, MSA and PSP (p = 0.020), and for good responsiveness and longitudinal construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: IPOS Neuro-S8 shows acceptable to promising psychometric properties in common forms of progressive LTNCs. Future work needs to confirm these findings with larger samples and its usefulness in wider disease groups.

How integrated are neurology and palliative care services? Results of a multicentre mapping exercise.

BACKGROUND: Patients affected by progressive long-term neurological conditions might benefit from specialist palliative care involvement. However, little is known on how neurology and specialist palliative care services interact. This study aimed to map the current level of connections and integration between these services. METHODS: The mapping exercise was conducted in eight centres with neurology and palliative care services in the United Kingdom. The data were provided by the respective neurology and specialist palliative care teams. Questions focused on: i) catchment and population served; ii) service provision and staffing; iii) integration and relationships. RESULTS: Centres varied in size of catchment areas (39-5,840 square miles) and population served (142,000-3,500,000). Neurology and specialist palliative care were often not co-terminus. Service provisions for neurology and specialist palliative care were also varied. For example, neurology services varied in the number and type of provided clinics and palliative care services in the settings they work in. Integration was most developed in Motor Neuron Disease (MND), e.g., joint meetings were often held, followed by Parkinsonism (made up of Parkinson's Disease (PD), Multiple-System Atrophy (MSA) and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP), with integration being more developed for MSA and PSP) and least in Multiple Sclerosis (MS), e.g., most sites had no formal links. The number of neurology patients per annum receiving specialist palliative care reflected these differences in integration (range: 9-88 MND, 3-25 Parkinsonism, and 0-5 MS). CONCLUSIONS: This mapping exercise showed heterogeneity in service provision and integration between neurology and specialist palliative care services, which varied not only between sites but also between diseases. This highlights the need and opportunities for improved models of integration, which should be rigorously tested for effectiveness.

Lung cancer diagnosed following an emergency admission: Mixed methods study of the management, outcomes and needs and experiences of patients and carers.

BACKGROUND: In the UK, although 40% of patients with lung cancer are diagnosed following an emergency admission (EA), data is limited on their needs and experiences as they progress through diagnostic and treatment pathways. METHODS: Prospective data collection using medical records, questionnaires and in-depth interviews. Multivariate logistic regression explored associations between diagnosis following EA and aspects of interest. Questionnaire responses with 95% confidence intervals were compared with local and national datasets. A grounded theory approach identified patient and carer themes. RESULTS: Of 401 patients, 154 (38%) were diagnosed following EA; 37 patients and six carers completed questionnaires and 13 patients and 10 carers were interviewed. Compared to those diagnosed electively, EA patients adjusted results found no difference in treatment recommendation, treatment intent or place of death. Time to diagnosis, review, or treatment was 7-14 days quicker but fewer EA patients had a lung cancer nurse present at diagnosis (37% vs. 62%). Palliative care needs were high (median [IQR] 21 [13-25] distressing or bothersome symptoms/issues) and various information and support needs unmet. Interviews highlighted in particular, perceived delays in obtaining investigations/specialist referral and factors influencing success or failure of the cough campaign. CONCLUSIONS: Presentation as an EA does not appear to confer any inherent disadvantage regarding progress through lung cancer diagnostic and treatment pathways. However, given the frequent combination of advanced disease, poor performance status and prognosis, together with the high level of need and reported short-fall in care, we suggest that a specialist palliative care assessment is routinely offered.

Lung cancer diagnosed following emergency admission: a mixed methods study protocol to improve understanding of patients' characteristics, needs, experiences and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of death from cancer in England. About 40% of patients with lung cancer are diagnosed following an emergency admission (DFEA) to hospital. DFEA is more common in women, and more likely with increasing age and deprivation. Most have advanced disease and survival is poor, but little else is known about this group. The aim of this study is to obtain a detailed understanding of the characteristics, needs, experiences and outcomes of this group. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single centre study with quantitative and qualitative work packages (WP). WP1 gathers basic details about all patients diagnosed with lung cancer during a 12 month period, focusing on demographics, diagnostic and treatment pathways and selected outcomes. WP2 obtains information from those patients DFEA or, when unable, their carers, about their holistic needs and experiences, using the Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral to Care questionnaire and selected questions from the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey. WP3 uses in-depth qualitative interviews with patients and carers to obtain detailed accounts of their symptoms, help-seeking behaviours prior to admission and subsequent experiences of care. DISCUSSION: Relatively little is known about the experiences of lung cancer patients DFEA and this study will provide detailed information about their needs, characteristics, experiences and outcomes. It should identify areas in the diagnostic and treatment pathway where there is scope to improve the care provided to this group of patients and their carers. The findings will also inform the need for further focused research.

Safer ambulatory syringe drivers: experiences of one acute hospital trust.

In December 2010 the National Patient Safety Agency released a Rapid Response Report citing evidence of harm and death necessitating the need to immediately address safety issues affecting ambulatory syringe drivers with rate settings in millimetres of travel. These devices are widely used in palliative care in the UK, both in the community and in the hospital setting. In order to ensure a successful changeover to a safer system, a coordinated, multidisciplinary, cross-boundary approach is essential. This article outlines the experiences of one acute hospital trust in identifying and trialling ambulatory syringe drivers to potentially adopt, and in implementing the selected driver and training staff in its use. It is hoped that it will provide insight into the challenges of undertaking such a change in practice.

Use of upper limb exercise to assess breathlessness in patients with cancer: tolerability, repeatability, and sensitivity.

We report the development of an arm exercise test to assess breathlessness in patients with lung cancer who are breathless at low levels of exertion. Exercise consisted of raising the arm over 40 cm, either the dominant arm only (n=10) or both arms alternating at minute intervals (n=12). Subjects breathed through a mouthpiece, and ventilation (VE) and oxygen uptake (VO(2)) were measured. Following familiarization, three tests were performed over one week to explore repeatability, and sensitivity was assessed in a fourth test. Arm exercise was generally well tolerated and increased breathlessness, VE, and VO(2). The commonest factor limiting exercise was arm fatigue, although four patients in the two-arm test also reported breathlessness. Repeatability for breathlessness score and VE was best in the two-arm test. The added resistance used to assess sensitivity could not be detected. The two-arm test offers a potential means of assessing the effects of an intervention on breathlessness and E in patients for whom a cycle or treadmill exercise test is unsuitable.

Prolongation of the QT interval in palliative care patients.

Prolonged QT interval on the electrocardiogram (ECG) is associated with an increased risk of cardiac arrhythmia and sudden death. Many drugs used in palliative medicine increase the QT interval and several have had their licenses withdrawn or severely restricted. The relative importance of prolonged QT interval will increase for palliative medicine physicians when dealing with patients with longer prognoses and especially cardiac disease. Given these safety concerns, the aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of a prolonged QT interval in palliative care patients who were not in the terminal stage and were referred to a specialist service. Of 300 patients, 47 (16%) had prolonged QTc but only two had QT >500ms. The presence of coexistent cardiac disease or high levels of serum alkaline phosphatase appear to be the clinical features most robustly associated with a prolonged QTc. Although prolonged QTc is relatively common in patients referred to a specialist palliative care service, severely prolonged QT is rare.

Descriptors of breathlessness in patients with cancer and other cardiorespiratory diseases.

The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between descriptors of breathlessness and its underlying cause in patients with lung cancer and cardiopulmonary diseases to see whether descriptors might be used to help determine the cause of breathlessness, particularly in patients with lung cancer. We studied 131 patients with primary or secondary lung cancer, whose breathlessness was attributed to tumor mass, pleural effusion, lung collapse, metastases, pleural thickening or lymphangitis carcinomatosis, and 130 patients with breathlessness attributed to asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease or cardiac failure. Patients selected statements (descriptors) that described the quality of their breathlessness from a 15-item questionnaire and the relationship between the descriptors and the attributed cause of breathlessness was evaluated by cluster analysis. All patient groups were characterized by more than one cluster and several clusters were shared between groups. Specific sets of clusters were associated with breathlessness due to asthma, COPD and cardiac failure, and to cancer causing collapse, metastases or pleural thickening. The association of different sets of clusters with the different diagnostic groups suggests that patients are describing qualitatively different experiences of breathlessness, but the relationship does not appear to be sufficiently robust for the questionnaire to aid differential diagnosis.