Ultrasound surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma: service evaluation of a radiology-led recall system in a tertiary-referral centre for liver diseases in the UK.

AIM: To review the radiology-led ultrasound (US) surveillance programme for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients in a UK tertiary-referral centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The radiology information system was searched for patients who had undergone US for surveillance of cirrhosis from September 2009 to May 2013. Patient demographics and cirrhosis aetiology were documented. Data including numbers of surveillance scans, abnormal findings suspicious for HCC, subsequent radiological investigations, numbers of HCC and survival for HCC patients were recorded. Service performance data, such as rates of attendance and rebooking, were also recorded. RESULTS: Eight hundred and four patients entered surveillance and 2,366 surveillance US examinations were performed; 368 (46%) underwent follow-up (6-monthly US). Abnormalities leading to further radiological investigations were found in 81 patients. Reasons for incomplete surveillance included non-attendance and radiology failure to re-book appointments. HCC was diagnosed in 22 patients. Fourteen had HCC diagnosed on a surveillance scan, eight had HCC diagnosed on a scan performed for other reasons. Patients diagnosed with HCC on a surveillance scan were more likely to be treated with curative intent and had longer survival. CONCLUSION: Even with a radiology-led recall service for HCC surveillance, the proportion of patients receiving scans 6-monthly was low, due in part to the lack of organisational support that is available for other screening programmes. This study gives a realistic representation of the implementation of surveillance in a UK hospital at the current time and of the rates of HCC proceeding to treatment.

A national survey of the provision of ultrasound surveillance for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the sixth most common cancer worldwide and third most common cause of cancer related death, is closely associated with the presence of cirrhosis. Survival is determined by the stage of the cancer, with asymptomatic small tumours being more amenable to treatment. Early diagnosis is dependent on regular surveillance and the primary objective of this survey was to gain a better understanding of the baseline attitudes towards and provision of ultrasound surveillance (USS) HCC surveillance in the UK. In addition, information was obtained on the stages of cancer of the patients being referred to and discussed at regional multidisciplinary team meetings. DESIGN: UK hepatologists, gastroenterologists and nurse specialists were sent a questionnaire survey regarding the provision of USS for detection of HCC in their respective hospitals. RESULTS: Provision of surveillance was poor overall, with many hospitals lacking the necessary mechanisms to make abnormal results, if detected, known to referring clinicians. There was also a lack of standard data collection and in many hospitals basic information on the number of patients with cirrhosis and how many were developing HCC was not known. For the majority of new HCC cases was currently being made only at an incurable late stage (60%). CONCLUSIONS: In the UK, the current provision of USS based HCC surveillance is poor and needs to be upgraded urgently.

The liver to abdominal area ratio (LAAR): a novel imaging score for prognostication in cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Anecdotally, liver size is important in determining prognosis in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). AIMS: To assess if a ratio of liver area and abdominal area on cross-sectional imaging could accurately predict mortality in ESLD. METHODS: A retrospective-prospective cohort study was performed on patients with ESLD in a training set. The censor point used was date of patient death or liver transplant (LT). The liver to abdominal area ratio (LAAR) was calculated using the formula {LAAR = [liver area (cm(2))/abdominal area (cm(2))] × 100}. A validation set was collected from a different institution. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixteen patients were identified. Complete imaging and survival data were available in 158 subjects, 100 male (63%). The LAAR score detected progression to death/LT in our cohort (P < 0.003). Its prognostic accuracy at 90, 360 and 720 days, using the optimal cut-off (32.1), from baseline CT date to death/LT using the log-rank test was P = 0.28, P = 0.06 (OR 1.347, 95% CI 0.94-1.94) and P < 0.0001 (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.25-2.85) respectively. On multivariate analysis, LAAR (P = 0.008), MELD (P = 0.004) and MELD-Na (P = 0.03) were independently associated with the primary study outcome measurement at 720 days. The validation set of 52 patients confirmed the utility of the LAAR to determine risk of death or need for LT, AUROC 0.89 (0.78-0.97), and P < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: The liver to abdominal area ratio (LAAR) score offers a new paradigm in disease modelling in end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and offers prognostic accuracy at 2 years from computer tomography (CT) imaging.

Do steatosis and steatohepatitis impact on sustained virological response (SVR) rates in patients receiving pegylated interferon and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C infection?

The impact of steatosis on treatment response in chronic hepatitis C infection is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine whether steatosis +/- steatohepatitis on pre-treatment liver biopsy influenced sustained virological response (HCV RNA negative 6 months after completing therapy) in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection treated with pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin. One hundred and seventy-nine patients, median age 46 years (interquartile range 40-52), treated between 2001 and 2005. Histological evidence of steatosis was present in 93 patients (52%) and steatohepatitis in 33 patients (18%), 31 patients (17.3%) were cirrhotic. There were 106 (59%) responders, who were similar to non-responders in respect to gender, age, and pre-treatment ALT. On univariate analysis, infection with genotype 2 or 3 was associated with sustained virological response (odds ratio 6.5 (95% CI, 3.3-12.5); P < 0.0001), whereas cirrhosis and patient weight were associated with a reduced response (odds ratios 0.23 (95% CI, 0.11-0.48); P < 0.0001, and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99); P < 0.01, respectively); steatohepatitis but not steatosis impacted on the likelihood of achieving sustained virological response (odds ratio 0.37 (95% CI, 0.17-0.77); P = 0.009, and P = 0.18, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that infection with genotype 1 or 4 (odds ratio 0.09 (95% CI, 0.03-0.32); P < 0.001) and pre-treatment weight (odds ratio 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.98); P = 0.002) were the only variables associated independently with sustained virological response. In chronic hepatitis C infection, although steatosis was associated with steatohepatitis, neither was shown to affect sustained virological response, which was influenced by genotype, patient weight and the presence of cirrhosis.

Prospective comparison of Fibroscan, King's score and liver biopsy for the assessment of cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C infection.

Historically, liver biopsy (LB) was the sole method to evaluate the severity of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. However, LB is expensive and associated with a risk of severe complications. Therefore, noninvasive tests have been developed to assess the severity of liver fibrosis. The accuracy of Fibroscan (FS) and King's score (KS) was evaluated individually and in combination using liver histology as the reference standard. One hundred and eighty-seven patients were identified who had undergone a biopsy with a diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) mono-infection (HCV RNA-positive by RT-PCR), attending King's College Hospital (n = 88) or the Royal Free Hospital (n = 99) (London) between May 2006 and December 2007. Liver fibrosis was scored using the Ishak method; significant fibrosis was defined as Ishak fibrosis stage F3-F6, and cirrhosis defined as Ishak fibrosis F5-F6. The diagnostic accuracy of each test was assessed by area under receiver operator characteristic curves (AUROC). Median age was 49 years (43-54) and 115 (61%) were male. The AUROC for FS, KS and FS + KS for the diagnosis of Ishak F3-F6 were 0.83, 0.82 and 0.85, respectively and for the diagnosis of cirrhosis (>or=F5) were 0.96, 0.89 and 0.93, respectively. The negative predictive values for the diagnosis of cirrhosis using the optimal cut-off results for fibrsocan (10.05 kPa), KS (24.3) and the two combined (26.1) were 98%, 91% and 94%, respectively. The noninvasive markers and, particularly, FS were effective tests for the prediction of cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C. Both KS and FS also had clinical utility for the prediction of Ishak fibrosis stages F3-F6.

A simple, noninvasive test for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation.

Recurrent hepatitis C is a common cause of graft loss in patients undergoing liver transplantation, and serial protocol liver biopsies have been used to identify patients at risk of graft loss from rapid fibrosis progression. The aim of this study was to derive a simple noninvasive index to predict fibrosis in patients with recurrent hepatitis C post-transplant. A retrospective study was performed assessing serial liver biopsies for post-transplant chronic hepatitis C infection. One hundred eighty-five patients were included in the analysis; median age 53 years (interquartile range 48-59) and 140 (76%) were male. Liver histology showed 53 (29%) had Ishak fibrosis stages F0/F1, 31 (17%) had F2, 29 (16%) had F3, 19 (10%) had F4 and 53 (29%) had F5/F6. The London Transplant Centres' (LTC) score was derived combining aspartate aminotransferase (AST IU/L), time from liver transplant (TFLT months), international normalized ratio and platelets. Diagnostic accuracy of the LTC score was assessed using area under receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The area under the ROC curve for moderate fibrosis (F >or= 2) was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.70-0.86; P < 0.0001), for advanced fibrosis (F4-6) was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72-0.87; P < 0.0001) and for cirrhosis was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72-0.88; P < 0.0001). An optimal cut-off value of 6.3 distinguished patients with no or mild fibrosis (F

The impact of hepatic steatosis on the natural history of chronic hepatitis C infection.

Since patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) often have hepatic steatosis, this retrospective analysis aimed to assess whether steatosis influences fibrosis progression. We studied 112 HCV RNA positive subjects (median age 44, IQR 39-51 years), who had two liver biopsies performed (median biopsy interval 50, 34-74 months). Fibrosis was staged using the Ishak method and steatosis by the Kleiner system (<5% steatosis = S0, 5-33% = S1, 33-66% = S2, and >66% = S3). The subjects were untreated because they had mild fibrosis (n = 59), declined therapy (n = 48), or had co-existing disease precluding treatment (n = 5). On first liver biopsy, 60 (54%) had S0, 34 (30%) had S1, 12 (11%) had S2, and 6 (5%) had S3. Steatosis was associated with genotype 3, odds ratio 4.8 (95% CI 1.3-16.7, P = 0.02). Twenty-three patients (21%) had disease progression on the second biopsy, defined as an increase in Ishak score by > or =1 stage. On univariate analysis, fibrosis progression was associated with older age (P = 0.004), higher AST (P = 0.04), and steatosis (P = 0.005) but on multivariate analysis, only baseline steatosis was significant, odds ratio 14.3 (2.1-111.1, P = 0.006). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that steatosis impacted on time to progression to both significant fibrosis (Ishak > or =F3) and cirrhosis (Ishak F5-6) (P = 0.001 and P = 0.049, respectively). The finding that steatosis was significantly associated with fibrosis progression indicates that, independent of baseline fibrosis stage, patients should be considered for anti-viral treatment if steatosis is present. Furthermore, strategies to reduce steatosis may have a beneficial effect on fibrosis progression and, therefore, patient outcome.

Current and future management of chronic hepatitis C infection.

Current treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection consists of the combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin. This treatment regimen achieves a sustained virological response, defined as undetectable HCV RNA 6 months after treatment cessation, in 50% of patients overall. There is therefore a need for new treatments to improve the sustained virological response rate and reduce the number of adverse effects associated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. This review examines the current management of chronic HCV infection, including who is eligible for treatment, the optimum duration of treatment, and management of side effects. New drugs in development, such as HCV-specific protease inhibitors, polymerase inhibitors, immune modulators and ribavirin analogues, are outlined, and their role in the treatment armamentarium is discussed, whether used alone or in combination with existing treatments.

Myeloma associated amyloidosis presenting as subacute liver failure.

Multiple myeloma related amyloidosis is rare and its presentation with subacute liver failure (SALF) has not been reported. A case is described of a 46 year old woman presenting with a six week history of nausea, abdominal pain, and jaundice. Routine tests failed to establish a cause. Computed tomography showed a small volume liver consistent with SALF. Emergency liver transplantation was not undertaken because of the suspicion of underlying malignancy. At necropsy, liver biopsy showed amyloid deposition and bone marrow biopsy showed multiple myeloma. Thus, amyloidosis should be added to the list of potential causes of SALF.