Incidence of early diaphragmatic dysfunction after lung transplantation: results of a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic dysfunction is common after cardiothoracic surgery, but few studies report its incidence and consequences after lung transplantation. We aimed to estimate the incidence of diaphragmatic dysfunction using ultrasound in lung transplant patients up to 3 months postoperatively and evaluated the impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a single-center prospective observational cohort study of 27 lung transplant recipients using diaphragmatic ultrasound preoperatively, at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Diaphragmatic dysfunction was defined as excursion < 10 mm in men and < 9 mm in women during quiet breathing. Clinical outcomes measured included duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay (LOS) in Intensive Care (ICU), and hospital LOS. RESULTS: Sixty-two percentage of recipients experienced new, postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction, but the prevalence fell to 22% at 3 months. No differences in clinical outcomes were found between those with diaphragmatic dysfunction compared to those without. Patients who experienced diaphragmatic dysfunction at 1 day postoperatively were younger and had a lower BMI than those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragmatic dysfunction is common after lung transplant, improves significantly within 3 months, and did not impact negatively on duration of mechanical ventilation, LOS in ICU or hospital, or discharge destination.

Commencing Out-of-Bed Rehabilitation in Critical Care-What Influences Clinical Decision-Making?

OBJECTIVES: To develop a decision tree that objectively identifies the most discriminative variables in the decision to provide out-of-bed rehabilitation, measure the effect of this decision and to identify the factors that intensive care unit (ICU) practitioners think most influential in that clinical decision. DESIGN: A prospective 3-part study: (1) consensus identification of influential factors in mobilization via survey; (2) development of an early rehabilitation decision tree; (3) measurement of practitioner mobilization decision-making. Treating practitioners of patients expected to stay >96 hours were asked if they would provide out-of-bed rehabilitation and rank factors that influenced this decision from an a priori defined list developed from a literature review and expert consultation. SETTING: Four tertiary metropolitan ICUs. PARTICIPANTS: Practitioners (ICU medical, nursing, and physiotherapy staff) (N=507). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A decision tree was constructed using binary recursive partitioning to determine the factor that best classified patients suitable for out-of-bed rehabilitation. Descriptive statistics were used to describe practitioner and patient samples as well as patient adverse events associated with out-of-bed rehabilitation and the factors prioritized by ICU practitioners. RESULTS: There were 1520 practitioner decisions representing 472 individual patient decisions. Practitioners classified patients suitable for out-of-bed rehabilitation on 149 occasions and not suitable on 323 occasions. Decision tree analysis showed the presence of an endotracheal tube (ETT) and sedation state were the only discriminative variables that predicted patient suitability for rehabilitation. In contrast, medical staff and nurses reported that ventilator status was the most influential factor in their decision not to provide rehabilitation while physiotherapists ranked sedation most highly. The presence of muscle weakness did not inform the decision to provide rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: These results confirm previous observational reports that the presence of an ETT remains a major obstacle to the provision of rehabilitation for critically ill patients. Despite rehabilitation being effective for improving muscle strength, the presence of muscle weakness did not influence the decision to provide rehabilitation.