Disparities in access but not outcomes: Medicaid versus non-Medicaid patients in multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation.

Purpose: There are known disparities in chronic pain severity, treatment, and opioid-related risks amongst individuals from lower socioeconomic status, including Medicaid beneficiaries, but little is known about whether Medicaid beneficiaries benefit in a similar way from multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation. This study investigated differences in clinical outcomes between Medicaid and non-Medicaid beneficiaries who completed a 3-week multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program.Methods: Participants (N = 131) completed a broad range of clinical measures pre- and post-treatment including pain severity, pain interference, depression, anxiety, objective physical functioning, and opioid misuse risk. Patients with Medicaid were compared with non-Medicaid patients in terms of baseline characteristics and rate of change, utilizing two-factor repeated measures analyses of variance.Results: There were baseline characteristic differences, with Medicaid beneficiaries being more likely to be African American, have higher rates of pain, worse physical functioning, and lower rates of opioid use. Despite baseline differences, both groups demonstrated significantly improved outcomes across all measures (p<.001) and no significant difference in rate of improvement.Conclusions: Results suggest that pain rehabilitation is as effective for Medicaid recipients as non-Medicaid recipients. Patients with Medicaid are particularly vulnerable to disparities in treatment, so efforts to expand access to multidisciplinary pain treatments are warranted.

Medicaid beneficiaries, who tend to be from lower socioeconomic status (SES), with chronic pain have poorer baseline functioning compared to non-Medicaid beneficiaries, including worse pain severity, poorer physical functioning, and higher levels of anxiety.Medicaid beneficiaries appear to benefit significantly and in a similar way to non-Medicaid individuals from participating in multidisciplinary, non-pharmacological chronic pain rehabilitation.Expanding access to evidence-based chronic pain rehabilitation, including nonopioid and multidisciplinary treatments, is a key component to address the chronic pain and opioid crises that differentially impact individuals from lower SES.

Patient Motivation to Reduce or Discontinue Opioids for Chronic Pain: Self-efficacy, Barriers, and Readiness to Change.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess levels and predictors of self-efficacy and motivation to change opioid use among a community sample of patients using opioids for chronic pain, as well as patient-reported barriers to pursuing opioid discontinuation. METHODS: Participants with a variety of chronic pain conditions, recruited from ResearchMatch.org , completed a battery of electronic, self-report questionnaires assessing demographic and medical characteristics, pain treatment history, and levels of readiness, self-efficacy, and other attitudes toward reducing or discontinuing opioid use. Multiple regression analyses and analyses of variance were conducted to examine predictors of readiness and self-efficacy to change opioid use. A modified version of rapid qualitative analysis was utilized to analyze themes in participant responses to an open-ended item about "what it would take" to consider opioid discontinuation. RESULTS: The final sample included N=119 participants, the majority of whom were female (78.2%), Caucasian (77.3%), and well-educated. Readiness and self-efficacy to decrease or stop opioid use were fairly low on a 0 to 10 Visual Analog Scale (2.6 to 3.8) and significantly higher to decrease than stop ( P <0.01). Higher readiness to change was predicted by lower pain severity and higher concern about opioids, whereas higher self-efficacy was predicted by shorter pain duration. Results from the qualitative analyses revealed that the availability of an alternative treatment option was the most commonly cited requirement to consider opioid discontinuation. DISCUSSION: Patients with lower pain severity, shorter duration of pain, and higher concerns about opioids may be a prime target from a motivation standpoint for interventions addressing opioid tapering and discontinuation.

Interprofessional Active Learning for Chronic Pain: Transforming Student Learning From Recall to Application.

Chronic pain (CP) affects over 50 million Americans daily and represents a unique challenge for healthcare professionals due to its complexity. Across all health professions, only a small percentage of the curriculum is devoted to treating patients with CP. Unfortunately, much of the content is delivered passively via lecture without giving students an opportunity to practice the communication skills to effectively treat patients in the clinic. An interprofessional team of health educators identified 5 essential messages that students frequently struggle to convey to patients with CP. Those messages were based on interprofessional and profession-specific competencies to treat patients with CP from the International Association for the Study of Pain. The 5 messages highlighted the importance of (1) therapeutic alliance, (2) consistent interdisciplinary language, (3) patient prognosis, (4) evidence for pain medicine, surgery, and imaging, and (5) early referral to the interprofessional team. For each message, the team summarized relevant research supporting the importance of each individual message that could serve as a foundation for didactic content. The team then developed active learning educational activities that educators could use to have students practice the skills tied to each message. Each learning activity was designed to be delivered in an interprofessional manner.

Association of Cerebral Hemodynamics and Anemia on Processing Speed in Adults with Sickle Cell Disease.

Background and Purpose: Compared to healthy controls, adult patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) are anemic, and therefore have higher cardiac output and Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) to maintain brain oxygenation. They also demonstrate comparatively more cognitive deficits due to either overt strokes or silent cerebral ischemia. However, there are few correlative studies between CBF and cognitive deficits, specifically processing speed in SCD. Such studies are important to develop biomarkers of central brain processing and ischemia for diagnosis, prognosis, and evaluating the effectiveness of potential interventions. This pilot cross-sectional study tested the hypotheses that adults with SCD and elevated CBF demonstrate lower central brain processing speed than controls on average and that CBF is inversely correlated with processing speed. Methods: We conducted a pilot cross-sectional study to assess the relation-ships between CBF, central brain processing speed, and hemoglobin levels in asymptomatic adults with SCD and controls from an urban academic medical center. MRI acquisitions at 3T consisted of 2D phase-contrast quantitative arteriograms (Qflow) of the bilateral internal carotid and vertebral arteries and 3D pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) of the brain. Participants were patients with SCD (hemoglobin [Hb]SS, [Hb] SBetaThal°, or [Hb]SC) aged 22-52 years of African American descent (N=7) or community controls (Hb AA) (n=3). Processing speed was assessed as an in-direct functional marker of ischemia using a recommended test from the NIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function, the Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test. t-tests were used to compare means of CBF, hemoglobin, and cognition between SCD patients and healthy controls. Among SCD patients only multivariate correla-tions were used to evaluate relationships between brain perfusion in specific brain regions vs. processing speed and CBF. The significance level was set at p≤0.05. Results: Adults with SCD reported higher CBF compared to healthy con-trols (72.15±28.90 vs. 47.23±12.30 ml/min/100g, p=0.04), and lower hemoglobin concentration (8.64±2.33 vs. 13.33±0.58, p=0.001). Heart rate in SCD patients was higher than in controls (86.29±1.37 vs. 74.00±2.10, p=0.04). Patients with SCD demonstrated lower processing speed (96.14±21.04 vs.123±13.74, p=0.02) than controls. Among adult patients with SCD, perfusion in specific regions of the brain showed an inverse relationship with processing speed, as did whole-brain CBF (p=0.0325). Conclusion: These findings, although from a small sample, lend a degree of validity to the claim that processing speed is slower in people with SCD than in controls and that CBF is significantly higher in SCD patients com-pared to controls. The results also lend credence to the finding that the degree of processing speed deficiencies among adults with SCD is correlated with the degree of elevated CBF, which is known to correspond with the degree of anemia associated with SCD.

Race, Ethnicity, and Belief in a Just World: Implications for Chronic Pain Acceptance Among Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain.

Chronic pain acceptance is a psychological process consistently linked with improved functional outcomes. However, existing research on this construct has not considered the role of racial or ethnic background, despite growing evidence of racialized disparities in pain experience and treatment. This study aimed to examine racial differences in chronic pain acceptance, as measured by the chronic pain acceptance questionnaires (CPAQ), in a multicultural sample of individuals with chronic low back pain (N = 137-37.2% White, 31.4% Hispanic, and 31.4% Black/African American). We further sought to examine moderating effects of discrimination, pain-related perceived injustice (PI), and just world belief (JWB). Analyses consisted of cross-sectional one-way analyses of variance with Bonferroni-corrected post hoc comparisons, followed by regression models with interaction terms, main effects, and relevant covariates. Results indicated higher scores on the CPAQ for White individuals compared to Black or Hispanic individuals. Significant interactions were noted between race/ethnicity and JWB in predicting pain acceptance, after controlling for demographic and pain-related variables, such that the positive association between JWB and pain acceptance was significant for White participants only. Race/ethnicity did not show significant interactions with PI or prior racial discrimination. Findings highlight racial differences in levels of chronic pain acceptance, an adaptive pain coping response, and a stronger JWB appears to have a positive impact on pain acceptance for White individuals only. Results further confirm that members of disadvantaged racial groups may be more susceptible to poorer pain adjustment, which is the result of complex, multi-level factors. PERSPECTIVE: This study identifies racial differences in levels of pain acceptance, an adaptive psychological response to chronic pain, such that White individuals with chronic low back pain demonstrate higher levels of pain acceptance. The article further explores the impacts of intrapersonal and sociocultural variables on racial differences in pain acceptance.

Feasibility and Quality Validation of a Mobile Application for Enhancing Adherence to Opioids in Sickle Cell Disease.

Prescription opioid nonadherence, specifically opioid misuse, has contributed to the opioid epidemic and opioid-related mortality in the US. Popular methods to measure and control opioid adherence have limitations, but mobile health, specifically smartphone applications, offers a potentially useful technology for this purpose. We developed, tested, and validated the OpPill application using the Mobile Applications Rating Scale (MARS), a validated tool for assessing the quality of mobile health apps. The MARS contains four scales (range of each scale = 0-4) that rate Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, and Information Quality. It also assesses subjective quality, relevance, and overall application impact. Our application was built to be a mobile monitoring and reporting system intended to enhance opioid adherence by collecting data and providing systematic feedback on pain and opioid use. Patients (n = 28) all had one of various SCD genotypes, were ages 19 to 59 years (mean 36.56), 53.6% were female, and 39.3% had completed some college. Patients rated the OpPill application highly on all four scales: Engagement, 3.93 ± 0.73; Functionality, 4.54 ± 0.66; Aesthetics, 3.92 ± 0.81; Information, 3.91 ± 0.87. The majority of patients found the application to be relevant for their care. A total of 96% reported the information within the app was complete, while 4% estimated the information to be minimal or overwhelming. Patients (91.7%) overwhelmingly reported that the quality of information as it pertained to SCD patients was relevant; only 8.3% found the application to be poorly relevant to SCD. Similarly, patients (91.7%) overwhelmingly rated both the application's performance and ease of use positively. The large majority of participants (85.7%) found the application to be interesting to use, while 74% found it entertaining. All users found the application's navigation to be logical and accurate with consistent and intuitive gestural design. We conclude that the OpPill application, specifically targeted to monitor opioid use and pain and opioid behavior in patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain, was feasible and rated by SCD patients as easy-to-use using a validated rating tool.

Gender-specific correlates of nonmedical use of prescription medications in a diverse primary care sample.

BACKGROUND: Nonmedical use of prescription medications (NUPM) is a growing problem but little is known about its gender-specific mechanisms despite NIDA's call for gender-stratified research over a decade ago. We explored gender differences in NUPM in a diverse sample of primary care patients. METHODS: N = 4458 participants participated in an anonymous health survey in urban primary care clinics. The primary outcome was past month NUPM. All analyses were stratified by gender. Bivariate relationships among NUPM and demographic, medical, psychological, and substance use-related variables were analyzed. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression models (LRMs) were estimated by gender. RESULTS: More men (9.5%) reported NUPM than women (7.4%). The final LRM among men included age (OR=0.98), race (OR=0.49), chronic pain diagnosis (OR=1.73), hepatitis (OR=1.78), depression diagnosis (OR=1.77), positive alcohol misuse screen (OR=1.58), and mood disturbance (OR=1.04). Among women, the model included mood disturbance (OR=1.04), illicit drug use (OR=2.22), family history of drug problems (OR=1.41), and heart disease diagnosis (OR=0.48). Effect sizes ranged from small to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Among a sample of primary care patients, gender-stratified analyses indicated differential presentation of NUPM by gender. Demographic factors were more relevant correlates among men, with younger, White men at higher risk. Chronic pain and depression were more notable risk factors for men. Recent illicit drug use and family history of drug problems were uniquely associated among women, while recent distress was a strong correlate among both men and women. A better understanding of gender-specific correlates of NUPM can inform gender-tailored prevention and treatment efforts.

Pain rehabilitation's dual power: Treatment for chronic pain and prevention of opioid-related risks.

The purpose of this article is to provide a data-driven exploration of an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (PRP) as a viable option for addressing the dual crises of chronic pain and opioid use. Psychologists are crucial providers in the PRP, in both intervention and leadership roles. There is well-established literature supporting pain rehabilitation as an effective treatment for chronic pain and functioning, but there are few studies examining the effects of pain rehabilitation on opioid misuse risk. We evaluated data from 60 patients with diverse chronic pain conditions who completed an interdisciplinary PRP to evaluate changes in pain, functioning (self-report and objective physical measure), psychological symptoms, and health-related quality of life. To evaluate the effect of pain rehabilitation on opioid-related risks, we examined opioid use and opioid misuse behaviors (measured by the Current Opioid Misuse Measure; COMM) pre- and posttreatment. Results demonstrated statistically significant improvements in all outcomes, with medium effect sizes for pain severity and large effect sizes for functioning, psychological symptoms, and emotional quality of life. Fifty-eight percent of patients were on opioid medications at entry compared with 15% at discharge. Among patients who entered on opioids, mean COMM scores were significantly reduced from above the cutoff for misuse risk (M = 13.57) to below the cutoff (M = 5.86). Overall, this study provided strong support for pain rehabilitation as an effective treatment for chronic pain and related suffering, while also providing a prevention-based opportunity for reducing opioid-related risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Adaptation of behavioral activation in the treatment of chronic pain.

Chronic pain is a common problem that can be challenging to treat because of its complex history, unclear etiology, and poor response to traditional treatment approaches. A growing body of research suggests that behavioral activation (BA), which was originally developed as a treatment for depression, may be a promising treatment for chronic pain. BA involves the identification and enactment of activities that are reinforcing to the individual and consistent with his or her long-term goals. The application of BA for the treatment of chronic pain is fully consistent with models of chronic pain which post that fear and avoidance leads to a cycle of physical deconditioning, increased pain as a result of deconditioning, lack of positive reinforcement, and low mood, and further reduced motivation to physically engage. The present paper will detail the assessment and use of BA to treat "Veteran," a patient with low back and bilateral foot pain. This case study highlights how gradually increasing engagement in previously avoided activities can help disrupt the harmful cycle among pain, fear and avoidance, and mood. The implication of the outcomes from this case study for future psychotherapy research on chronic pain is also discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

Online Versus In-Person Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment Training in Pediatrics Residents.

BACKGROUND: Pediatricians underestimate the prevalence of substance misuse among children and adolescents and often fail to screen for and intervene in practice. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends training in Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT), but training outcomes and skill acquisition are rarely assessed. OBJECTIVE: We compared the effects of online versus in-person SBIRT training on pediatrics residents' knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and skills. METHODS: Forty pediatrics residents were randomized to receive either online or in-person training. Skills were assessed by pre- and posttraining standardized patient interviews that were coded for SBIRT-adherent and -nonadherent behaviors and global skills by 2 trained coders. Thirty-two residents also completed pre- and postsurveys of their substance use knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors (KABs). Two-way repeated measures multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVAs) and analyses of variance (ANOVAs) estimates were used to assess group differences in skill acquisition and KABs. RESULTS: Findings indicated that both groups demonstrated skill improvement from pre- to postassessment. Results indicated that both groups increased their knowledge, self-reported behaviors, confidence, and readiness with no significant between-group differences. Follow-up univariate analyses indicated that, while both groups increased their SBIRT-adherent skills, the online training group displayed more "undesirable" behaviors posttraining. CONCLUSIONS: The current study indicates that brief training, online or in-person, can increase pediatrics residents' SBIRT skills, knowledge, self-reported behaviors, confidence, and readiness. The findings further indicate that in-person training may have incremental benefit in teaching residents what not to do.

End-of-treatment abstinence self-efficacy, behavioral processes of change, and posttreatment drinking outcomes in Project MATCH.

This study evaluated whether alcohol abstinence self-efficacy at the end of alcohol treatment was moderated by utilization of behavioral processes of change (coping activities used during a behavior change attempt). It was hypothesized that self-efficacy would be differentially important in predicting posttreatment drinking outcomes depending on the level of behavioral processes, such that the relation between self-efficacy and outcomes would be stronger for individuals who reported low process use. Analyses were also estimated with end-of-treatment abstinence included as a covariate. Data were analyzed from alcohol-dependent individuals in both treatment arms of Project MATCH (Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Heterogeneity; N = 1,328), a large alcohol treatment study. Self-efficacy was moderated by behavioral process use in predicting drinking frequency 6 and 12 months posttreatment and drinking quantity 6 months posttreatment such that self-efficacy was more strongly related to posttreatment drinking when low levels of processes were reported than high levels, but interactions were attenuated when end-of-treatment abstinence was controlled for. Significant quadratic relations between end-of-treatment self-efficacy and 6- and 12-month posttreatment drinking quantity and frequency were found (p < .001, ƒ² = 0.02-0.03), such that self-efficacy most robustly predicted outcomes when high. These effects remained significant when end-of-treatment abstinence was included as a covariate. Findings highlight the complex nature of self-efficacy's relation with drinking outcomes. Although the interaction between self-efficacy and behavioral processes was attenuated when end-of-treatment abstinence was controlled for, the quadratic effect of self-efficacy on outcomes remained significant. The pattern of these effects did not support the idea of "overconfidence" as a negative indicator.

Evaluating training of screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) for substance use: Reliability of the MD3 SBIRT Coding Scale.

Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) has become an empirically supported and widely implemented approach in primary and specialty care for addressing substance misuse. Accordingly, training of providers in SBIRT has increased exponentially in recent years. However, the quality and fidelity of training programs and subsequent interventions are largely unknown because of the lack of SBIRT-specific evaluation tools. The purpose of this study was to create a coding scale to assess quality and fidelity of SBIRT interactions addressing alcohol, tobacco, illicit drugs, and prescription medication misuse. The scale was developed to evaluate performance in an SBIRT residency training program. Scale development was based on training protocol and competencies with consultation from Motivational Interviewing coding experts. Trained medical residents practiced SBIRT with standardized patients during 10- to 15-min videotaped interactions. This study included 25 tapes from the Family Medicine program coded by 3 unique coder pairs with varying levels of coding experience. Interrater reliability was assessed for overall scale components and individual items via intraclass correlation coefficients. Coder pair-specific reliability was also assessed. Interrater reliability was excellent overall for the scale components (>.85) and nearly all items. Reliability was higher for more experienced coders, though still adequate for the trained coder pair. Descriptive data demonstrated a broad range of adherence and skills. Subscale correlations supported concurrent and discriminant validity. Data provide evidence that the MD3 SBIRT Coding Scale is a psychometrically reliable coding system for evaluating SBIRT interactions and can be used to evaluate implementation skills for fidelity, training, assessment, and research. Recommendations for refinement and further testing of the measure are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record