Subject(s)
Appendicitis/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Peritonitis/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Appendicitis/surgery , Chile/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Communicable Disease Control , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Peritonitis/surgery , Prevalence , Severity of Illness Index , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Palliative gastrojejunostomy is a surgical technique that allows restoration of oral intake among patients with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) caused by unresectable neoplasms. Research suggests standard treatment for malignant GOO should be laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LGJ). This study presents the clinical outcomes of palliative gastrojejunostomy and compares results from LGJ and open gastrojejunostomy (OGJ) at our centre. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on patients who underwent palliative gastrojejunostomy for GOO caused by unresectable neoplasms between 2008 and 2018. We included demographic variables, time to recover intestinal transit, time to recover oral intake, hospital stay, complications and global survival. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients underwent palliative gastrojejunostomy (20 OGJ, 19 LGJ). Patients in the LGJ group recovered oral intake and intestinal transit faster than those in the OGJ group (3 vs 5 days, p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in median operating time, hospital stay or postoperative complications between the two groups. No intraoperative complications occurred. The estimated global survival was 178 days, with no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative LGJ allows earlier restoration of oral intake and does not increase morbidity or mortality. Palliative LGJ should be considered the standard treatment for these patients.
Subject(s)
Eating , Gastric Bypass/methods , Gastric Outlet Obstruction/surgery , Gastrointestinal Transit , Neoplasms/complications , Palliative Care/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Duodenal Neoplasms/complications , Female , Gallbladder Neoplasms/complications , Gastric Outlet Obstruction/etiology , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparotomy/methods , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Operative Time , Pancreatic Neoplasms/complications , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/complications , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy and inguinal hernioplasty are the most frequent surgeries in Chile and the world. Laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty, being a clean surgery, reports mesh infection rates of less than 2% and adding a simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy is controversial due to an increase in the risk of mesh infection. The aim of this paper is to report the results of simultaneous TAPP hernioplasty with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of the digestive surgery database. We identified cases in which laparoscopic inguinal TAPP repair and simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy were performed. Demographic, clinical information, hernia type and size, data from the surgery and its complications were also retrieved and analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 21 patients, 86% male and with an average age of 61 years range 46-84. 72% of the hernias were unilateral, predominating indirect 50%, direct 28% and the remaining were femoral and mixed. The average hernia size was 2.2 cm. The meshes used were 56% polypropylene, 37% polyester and 5% PVDF. We report one gallblader perforation. At a median time of 40 months of follow-up (range 4-89 months), one hernia recurrence was found (3.7%), there were no reoperations at the time of the interview and there were no cases of mesh infection. Complications of surgery includes one ipsilateral testicular atrophy 4.8% and 1 ipsilateral inguinal seroma 4.8%. CONCLUSIONS: In this series of cases, adding clean contaminated surgery to the inguinal TAPP hernioplasty was not associated with an increase in the infection of the mesh.
