ABSTRACT
The role of the transplant pharmacist is recognized by transplant programs, governmental groups, and professional organizations as an essential part of the transplant multidisciplinary team. This role has evolved drastically over the last decade with the advent of major advances in the science of transplantation and the growth of the field, which necessitate expanded pharmacy services to meet the needs of patients. Data now exist within all realms of the phases of care for a transplant recipient regarding the utility and benefit of a solid organ transplant (SOT) pharmacist. Furthermore, governing bodies now have the opportunity to use Board Certification in Solid Organ Transplant Pharmacotherapy as a mechanism to identify and recognize specialty knowledge and expertise within the field of SOT pharmacotherapy. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overarching review of the current and future state of SOT pharmacy while also identifying major changes to the profession, forthcoming challenges, and expected areas of growth.
Subject(s)
Organ Transplantation , Pharmacists , Humans , Follow-Up Studies , CertificationABSTRACT
Pediatric transplant recipients commonly have deficient vaccination status at the time of transplantation. Utilizing transplant pharmacists to improve vaccination rates has not previously been described. This single-center, retrospective study evaluated the impact of transplant pharmacist interventions on the completion rate of vaccination schedules at time of kidney transplant. Patients who received pharmacist-led vaccination recommendations prior to transplant were compared to patients without pharmacist recommendations. Forty-seven pediatric patients were included: 24 intervention patients and 23 control patients. The median percentage of up-to-date vaccinations at time of transplant was significantly higher in intervention group (91%; IQR 86%-100%) vs. control group (80%; IQR 71%-80%) (P<.0001). The median change in up-to-date vaccinations from time of evaluation to time of transplant was also significantly higher in the intervention group (7.5%) compared to the control group (0%) (P<.0001). There was no difference in live vaccination rates. No patients in either group were readmitted for a vaccine-preventable disease within 6 months post-transplant. With pharmacist intervention, significantly more patients were up to date with vaccination schedules at the time of transplant. These results suggest that a transplant pharmacist may serve as a valuable resource to increase vaccination schedule compliance between time of evaluation and transplantation.
