Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Am J Crit Care ; 31(3): 250-254, 2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35466343

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many critically ill patients have invasive arterial catheters inserted for blood pressure monitoring. Whether catheter leveling method and alternative transducer location affect the accuracy of blood pressure measurements is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of alternative transducer locations and visual alignment versus laser device leveling significantly affect the accuracy of blood pressure measurements. METHODS: A convenience sample of 36 participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 experimental groups with different transducer locations: taped to the upper arm, next to the upper arm taped to a rolled cloth, or at the wrist. Participants served as their own controls; the control condition was having the transducer on the intravenous pole. Four blood pressure measurements were recorded for each patient (2 from each of the experimental and control conditions) using visual alignment and then laser device leveling. RESULTS: Only diastolic blood pressure (DBP) differed significantly between leveling methods (P = .01); no pressures differed significantly by transducer location. Covariate analysis indicated expected relationships between (1) age and DBP (P = .001), (2) Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and both DBP (P = .003) and mean arterial pressure (P = .03), and (3) duration of mechanical ventilation and DBP (P = .05). CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that any of the transducer locations evaluated may be useful in clinical prac-tice. Also, visual alignment rather than laser device leveling may be acceptable, except for DBP in the control location. More research is needed to strengthen these findings.


Subject(s)
Arterial Pressure , Blood Pressure Determination , Arterial Pressure/physiology , Blood Pressure , Humans , Monitoring, Physiologic , Transducers
5.
J Am Acad Nurse Pract ; 15(6): 260-5, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12861892

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine the benefits of an advanced practice nurse (APN) driven, hospital-based heart failure center. DATA SOURCES: Selected multidisciplinary studies, review articles, Heart Failure Society of America practice guidelines, and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical practice guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: APN specialists in this hospital-based heart failure center provide heart failure patients with high quality multidisciplinary health care in a single environment, which leads to optimal outcomes. Patients experience positive outcomes as evidenced by spared hospitalizations, improved scores on the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Survey, and the 6-min walk. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: APNs with prescriptive authority can effectively direct heart failure care for outpatients by utilizing multidisciplinary resources of the hospital. Treatment strategies include titrating medication, frequent symptom monitoring, tracking medication and dietary compliance, telemonitoring, and providing aggressive multidisciplinary education. This approach is highly effective for reducing hospital readmissions as well as for improving quality of life and functional status for outpatients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Heart Failure/nursing , Heart Failure/rehabilitation , Nurse Practitioners , Nurse's Role , Nurse-Patient Relations , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nurse Practitioners/standards , Nurse Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Assessment , Nursing Evaluation Research , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/standards , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Patient Readmission , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Quality of Life , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL