Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Urol Int ; 75(4): 309-13, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16327296

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Gemcitabine, a chemotherapeutic agent, has been shown to be active against transitional cell cancer of the bladder. The aim of the study was to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of gemcitabine, administered intravesically in patients with carcinoma in situ(CIS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nine patients with CIS refractory to intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy were enrolled. Gemcitabine was given in 50 ml 0.9% NaCl by catheterization and held in the bladder for 1 h, once weekly for 6 consecutive weeks. The pharmacokinetics for gemcitabine metabolites were performed in plasma and serum. Dose levels were: 1,000, 1,250, and 1,500 mg. Clinical evaluation was repeated 4 weeks after therapy and thereafter every 6 months. RESULTS: Grade-1 neutropenia was observed only in 1 patient. Grade-1 urinary frequency and hematuria were observed in 1 and 3 patients, respectively. No grade 2-4 toxicity or clinically relevant myelosuppression were observed. Gemcitabine was detectable in serum, but with an irrelevant pharmacological effect, in only 1 patient treated with 1,500 mg of gemcitabine. With regard to activity, after 6 instillations of this drug, 4 complete responses were observed. CONCLUSION: Intravesical gemcitabine is well tolerated and safe. No systemic absorption with a clinical or pharmacological effect was detected and only slightly irritative bladder symptoms were observed. These results warrant further investigation in phase-II trials.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/adverse effects , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/pharmacokinetics , BCG Vaccine/adverse effects , Carcinoma in Situ/drug therapy , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Ribonucleotide Reductases/antagonists & inhibitors , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Administration, Intravesical , Aged , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , BCG Vaccine/therapeutic use , Biopsy , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Cystoscopy , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/pharmacokinetics , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Resistance , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/blood , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Gemcitabine
2.
Br J Cancer ; 93(1): 29-34, 2005 Jul 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15956971

ABSTRACT

This phase II study evaluated the response rate and tolerability of gemcitabine-oxaliplatin chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8, followed by oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2) on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for up to six cycles. From February 2002 to May 2004, 60 patients were enrolled into the study in seven Italian institutions. We observed one complete response (1.7%) and 14 partial responses (23.3%), for an overall response rate of 25.0% (95% confidence interval, 14.7-37.9%). The median duration of response was 5.9 months (range 1.5-17.1 months). With a median follow-up of 6.7 months, median time to progressive disease and overall survival were 2.7 (range 1.9-3.4 months) and 7.3 months (range 7.2-8.6 months), respectively. The main grade 3-4 haematological toxicities were transient neutropenia in 11.7% and thrombocytopenia in 8.3% of the patients. Nausea/vomiting was the main grade 3-4 nonhaematological toxicity, occurring in 10.0% of the patients. Two (3.3%) patients developed grade 3 neurotoxicity. Our results show that gemcitabine-oxaliplatin chemotherapy is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC, deserving further study, especially for patients not eligible to receive cisplatin.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/adverse effects , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Organoplatinum Compounds/adverse effects , Oxaliplatin , Gemcitabine
3.
Int J Oncol ; 24(2): 389-98, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14719116

ABSTRACT

Many active cytotoxic drugs and several regimens exist for breast cancer therapy. However, these conventional treatments have not changed the outcome of patients with locally advanced and metastatic disease. As a consequence, the dynamic balance between chemotherapy-induced side effects and benefits attributable to relief of cancer-related symptoms must be carefully considered in this setting. Gemcitabine is a pyrimidine nucleoside antimetabolite that has shown activity in a variety of solid tumors, a good toxicity profile, and non-overlapping toxicity with other chemotherapeutic drugs. As a single agent, gemcitabine yields response rates ranging from 14 to 37% as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer and 12-30% as salvage therapy for patients previously treated with anthracycline and/or taxane treatment. Combined with vinorelbine, platinum, anthracyclines, and taxanes as doublets or triplets, response rates of 50 to 80% have been reported in phase II clinical studies. Gemcitabine in combination with anthracyclines and taxanes has been evaluated in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with early-stage breast cancer with interesting clinical and pathological response rates. Preliminary results of gemcitabine in combination with the biologic agent, trastuzumab, are encouraging. Phase III trials of gemcitabine combinations compared to standard regimens are ongoing with the aim to assess the independent contribution of gemcitabine.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Vinblastine/analogs & derivatives , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Clinical Trials as Topic , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Docetaxel , Female , Glutamates/administration & dosage , Guanine/administration & dosage , Humans , Pemetrexed , Taxoids/administration & dosage , Trastuzumab , Vinblastine/administration & dosage , Vinorelbine , Gemcitabine
4.
J Chemother ; 15(5): 507-9, 2003 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14603882

ABSTRACT

Primary leiomyosarcomas (LMSs) of the lung are extremely rare malignancies that have been the subject of single or small series of case reports. Today, the gold standard of treatment in patients with locally advanced and metastatic disease includes one of the many possible regimens containing an anthracycline and/or ifosfamide. Few chemotherapy agents are active in the second-line setting. In particular, gemcitabine is considered quite ineffective in the treatment of first- as well as second-line chemotherapy of soft tissue sarcoma and responses to this agent are seldom reported. In this paper, we report a single patient with primary LMS of the lung previously treated with a combination of epirubicin and ifosfamide. The patient responded to second-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 given as a 30-minute infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle and showed an 8-month response duration and negligible toxicity. Gemcitabine may represent an alternative to the best supportive care in patients affected with soft tissue sarcoma who fail first-line chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , Leiomyosarcoma/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Deoxycytidine/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Epirubicin/administration & dosage , Epirubicin/pharmacology , Humans , Ifosfamide/administration & dosage , Ifosfamide/pharmacology , Leiomyosarcoma/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Gemcitabine
5.
Br J Cancer ; 88(4): 491-5, 2003 Feb 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12592360

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of gemcitabine plus mitoxantrone in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and to evaluate activity and toxicity of this combination in a phase II trial. Sixty-three patients with MBC, previously treated with chemotherapy including anthracycline and/or taxanes, were treated with mitoxantrone 10 or 12 mg m(-2) intravenously on day 1 plus gemcitabine in escalating doses from 600 to 1200 mg m(-2) intravenously on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. In phase I, on 23 patients entered on study, dose-limiting toxicity occurred at the dosage of 1200 mg m(-2) gemcitabine and 10 mg m(-2) mitoxantrone, with three out of five patients developing grade 4 neutropenia. In phase II, with gemcitabine administered at 1000 mg m(-2) and mitoxantrone at 10 mg m(-2), 12 (30%) out of 40 assessable patients responded, even if no complete response was obtained. Moreover, stable disease was observed in eight (20%) patients. The median time to treatment failure was 22 weeks (range, 2-33), and median survival was 42 weeks (range, 2-92). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia were observed in 12 (30%) and one (2.5%) cases respectively; grade 3 thrombocytopenia was observed in two patients (5%), grade 2 mucositis in two patients (5%), grade 3 anaemia in two patients (5%), grade 3 alopecia in one patient (2.5%) and asymptomatic cardiotoxicity in three patients (8%), respectively. In conclusion, the doses of 10 mg m(-2) (day 1) for mitoxantrone and 1000 mg m(-2) for gemcitabine (days 1-8) every 3 weeks resulted active and safe in MBC. Further investigations in less heavily pretreated patients are warranted.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , Mitoxantrone/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Metastasis/drug therapy , Salvage Therapy , Adult , Aged , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Deoxycytidine/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Heart Diseases/chemically induced , Heart Diseases/complications , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Mitoxantrone/adverse effects , Salvage Therapy/adverse effects , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/drug therapy , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/secondary , Gemcitabine
6.
Melanoma Res ; 12(6): 619-25, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12459652

ABSTRACT

Both primary and metastatic melanoma of the gallbladder are rare. Involvement of the gallbladder occurs in about 15% of all gastrointestinal metastatic localizations in post-mortem case records. It is often difficult to differentiate primary from metastatic lesions on the basis of clinical, radiological and histopathological features. Melanoma involving the biliary tree seldom causes relevant symptoms during life, and this is why cases reported in the literature are few and those documented in living patients even fewer. We report a case of a young woman with a metastatic gallbladder melanoma who presented with a long and vague clinical history of symptoms that mimicked chronic cholecystitis with epigastric right hypochondrial pain without instrumental evidence of disease until the development of acute cholecystitis. We report this case to emphasize the need for awareness of the possibility of gallbladder involvement in the melanoma patient and to underline the necessity of meticulous investigation of unclear lesions of the gallbladder and biliary tree in patients with a past history of malignant melanoma. The clinical presentation, diagnosis, histopathology, prognosis and treatment of primary and metastatic melanoma of the gallbladder are also discussed and reviewed.


Subject(s)
Gallbladder Neoplasms/diagnosis , Gallbladder Neoplasms/secondary , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/secondary , Adult , Cholecystitis/etiology , Fatal Outcome , Female , Gallbladder Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Melanoma/complications , Melanoma/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/complications , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
7.
Ann Oncol ; 13(12): 1862-7, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12453853

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel combined with a fixed dose of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to evaluate in a phase II trial the efficacy of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were treated with paclitaxel in escalating doses from 40-80 mg/m(2) combined with gemcitabine and vinorelbine at fixed doses of 1000 mg/m(2) and 25 mg/m(2), respectively. All drugs were given intravenously on day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: In a phase I trial, carried out on 21 patients, grade 4 neutropenia, as dose-limiting toxicity, occurred at the dosage level of paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2). In a phase II trial, with paclitaxel administered at 70 mg/m(2), 27 out of 41 (66%) assessable patients responded (10% complete responses and 56% partial responses). Objective response was observed in 13 of 16 patients (81%) with stage IIIB disease and in 14 of 25 (56%) with stage IV disease. The median time to treatment failure was 26 weeks (range 3-72 weeks; 32 weeks and 20 weeks for stages IIIB and IV, respectively) and median survival 62 weeks (range 4-176 weeks; 72 weeks and 56 weeks for stages IIIB and IV, respectively). One-year survival was 64% for all patients (72% for patients with stage IIIB and 52% for those with stage IV). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia were observed in 11 (27%) and seven (17%) cases, respectively; grade 3 thrombocytopenia was observed in three patients (7%) and grade 3 anemia in four patients (10%). The most relevant non-hematological toxicity was grade 2/3 asthenia, which was observed in 12 patients (29%). Alopecia was almost universal, whereas nausea and vomiting were absent. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine is effective and tolerable in the treatment of NSCLC. The high activity and low toxicity of this regimen warrant randomized studies with platinum-containing combinations.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Vinblastine/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Biopsy, Needle , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Vinblastine/administration & dosage , Vinblastine/adverse effects , Vinorelbine , Gemcitabine
8.
Ann Oncol ; 13(6): 866-73, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12123331

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the activity and toxicity of the combination of irinotecan (IRI) plus folinic acid (FA)-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) i.v. bolus with a regimen of double modulation of 5-FU with methotrexate (MTX) and FA in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two-hundred and thirty-four patients were enrolled: 118 patients received IRI 200 mg/m2 (90-min i.v. infusion) on day 1, followed by levo-FA 250 mg/m2 (2-h i.v. infusion) and 5-FU 850 mg/m2 (i.v. bolus) on day 2 (IRIFAFU), and 116 patients received MTX 750 mg/m2 (2-h i.v. infusion) on day 1, followed by levo-FA 250 mg/m2 (2-h i.v. infusion) and FU 800 mg/m2 (i.v. bolus) on day 2 (MTXFAFU). Both cycles were repeated every 2 weeks until progression or to a maximum of 16 cycles. Response rate (RR) was the main end point of the study; responses were assessed every four cycles and confirmed after 2 additional months of treatment. RESULTS: RR was significantly greater with IRIFAFU (36%) than with MTXFAFU (20%) (P <0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that IRIFAFU was significantly associated with a greater activity (P = 0.028). Median progression-free survival was longer with IRIFAFU than with MTXFAFU (7.2 months compared with 4.8 months; P = 0.048). Median survival time (MST) did not differ between the two arms (14.7 months compared with 14.8 months, respectively). Patients not receiving second-line chemotherapy, however, lived longer when treated in the first-line with IRIFAFU (MST 11.9 months compared with 6.4 months; P = 0.038). IRIFAFU caused a significantly greater occurrence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (40% compared with 9%; P = 0.001) and diarrhoea (13% compared with 4%; P = 0.024), but a significantly lower incidence of stomatitis (3% compared with 12%; P = 0.007), than the comparative regimen. CONCLUSIONS: IRIFAFU appeared comparable in terms of activity and toxicity with other weekly or biweekly bolus or infusional combination regimens. IRIFAFU, however, seems easier to administer, because it does not require infusional catheter or pump devices, and it is less expensive. It may represent a new option for treating advanced colorectal carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Biopsy, Needle , Camptothecin/administration & dosage , Camptothecin/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Disease-Free Survival , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Humans , Irinotecan , Italy , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Leucovorin/adverse effects , Male , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Remission Induction , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
9.
Int J Oncol ; 21(1): 179-86, 2002 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12063566

ABSTRACT

Standard therapy for patients affected with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer is cytoreductive surgery followed by combination chemotherapy. With this treatment, most patients obtain clinical complete or partial response, nevertheless, relapse is common and salvage chemotherapy is often needed. The probability of response to second line chemotherapy following platinum-based treatments is usually related to the platinum-free interval, even if recent studies have reported some other clinical features as having prognostic value, such as tumour burden and histology. Salvage monochemotherapy is generally used, but when the platinum-free interval is longer than 24 months, re-treatment with platinum compounds and/or taxanes is indicated. Moreover, a number of new agents with demonstrated activity in ovarian cancer are currently available. Sequentially used in recurrent disease, these agents may improve survival and/or quality of life. Among these new drugs, the most promising are: topotecan, doxil, gemcitabine and platinum analogues such as oxaliplatin, nedaplatin, satraplatin, BBR3464 and ZD0473. However, the real aim of salvage chemotherapy in relapsed ovarian cancer still remains palliative care, because complete responses are very rarely reported and long lasting responses are very seldom observed.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Female , Humans
10.
Br J Cancer ; 86(12): 1871-5, 2002 Jun 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12085178

ABSTRACT

The aim of the present study was to define the activity and tolerability of a triplet regimen including oxaliplatin 130 mg x m(-2) (2 h i.v. infusion) and raltitrexed 3.0 mg x m(-2) (15 min i.v. infusion) given on day 1, followed by levo-folinic acid 250 mg x m(-2) (2 h i.v. infusion) and 5-fluorouracil 1050 mg x m(-2) i.v. bolus on day 2, every 2 weeks, in pretreated colorectal cancer patients. From April 1999 to December 2000, 50 patients were enrolled: 26 were males and 24 females, their median age was 63 (range, 43-79) years; ECOG performance status was 0 in 26 patients, > or =1 in 24 patients; 26 patients had received previous adjuvant chemotherapy, 40 patients had been exposed to one or two lines of palliative chemotherapy (including irinotecan in 31 cases); 18 patients were considered chemo-refractory. A total of 288 cycles were administered, with a median number of 6 (range 1-12) courses per patient. A complete response was obtained in three patients, and a partial response in nine patients, giving a major response rate of 24% (95% confidence interval, 13-38%), while 15 further patients showed a stable disease, for an overall control of tumour growth in 60% of patients. Three complete responses and three partial responses were obtained in patients pretreated with irinotecan (response rate, 19%); among refractory patients, three achieved partial responses (response rate, 13%). After a median follow-up of 18 (range, 10-30) months, 40 patients showed a progression of disease: the growth modulation index ranged between 0.2 and 2.5: it was > or =1.33 (showing a significant delay of tumour growth) in 16 (40%) patients. Actuarial median progression-free survival time was 7.6 months, and median survival time was 13.6 months: estimated probability of survival was 55% at 1 year. Main severe toxicity was neutropenia: World Health Organisation grade 4 affected 32% of patients; non-haematological toxicity was mild: World Health Organisation grade 3 diarrhoea was complained of by 8%, and grade 3 stomatitis by 4% of patients; neurotoxicity (according to Lévi scale) was scored as grade 3 in 8% of patients. In conclusion, this regimen was manageable and active as salvage treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients; it showed incomplete cross-resistance with irinotecan-based treatments, and proved to delay the progression of disease in a relevant proportion of treated patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Camptothecin/administration & dosage , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Disease Progression , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Irinotecan , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Leucovorin/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Organoplatinum Compounds/adverse effects , Oxaliplatin , Quinazolines/administration & dosage , Quinazolines/adverse effects , Salvage Therapy , Thiophenes/administration & dosage , Thiophenes/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
11.
Eur J Cancer ; 37(3): 364-8, 2001 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11239758

ABSTRACT

A potential way to improve the results obtained with the standard carboplatin/cisplatin (CDDP)-paclitaxel treatment regimen in advanced ovarian cancer is to incorporate a modulating agent such as lonidamine (LND). In fact, LND has been shown to revert the resistance to cisplatin and to potentiate cisplatin activity experimental models and in clinical studies. 35 consecutive patients with advanced ovarian cancer, not previously treated with chemotherapy were treated with paclitaxel at a dose of 135 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) on day 1 (in a 3 h infusion) and cisplatin at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) iv on day 2 plus LND orally (p.o.) at a dose of 450 mg/die for 6 consecutive days starting two days before chemotherapy, every 3 weeks for six cycles. Complete plus partial responses were observed in 8 (80%) out of the 10 women with measurable disease. In the 25 patients with evaluable disease, only four clinical progressions were observed (16%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 28.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 22.2-34.8) and 46.5 (95% CI 32.4-60.00) months respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 9 (26%) patients. Alopecia, nausea and vomiting (Grade 3) were observed in 33 (94%) and 5 (14%) patients, respectively. In conclusion, the combination of CDDP/paclitaxel plus LND is active and tolerable in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Humans , Indazoles/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
12.
Minerva Endocrinol ; 26(4): 239-41, 2001 Dec.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11782709

ABSTRACT

The therapeutic efforts of the past thirty years have been directed at improving the scant prognosis of patients suffering from microcytoma (SCLC) using a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Studies have shown that the longest survival rates are achieved when radiotherapy is administered concomitantly with chemotherapy. No clear correlation has been identified between the 3-year disease-free survival rate and the type of chemotherapy used. The standard treatment for patients suffering from SCLC is currently polychemotherapy using protocols with cisplatin, with or without radiotherapy. Among the new protocols that have been proposed, an increase in dose intensity, weekly therapy and alternating chemotherapy appear to give the most promising results, even if no studies have so far actually demonstrated their ability to improve results.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Small Cell/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Small Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Small Cell/radiotherapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Prognosis , Survival Analysis
13.
Int J Oncol ; 17(5): 1037-41, 2000 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11029510

ABSTRACT

New aromatase inhibitors are an exciting treatment option for postmenopausal women with hormone sensitive breast cancer. They have been shown to reduce tumors in a significant number of patients, and exhibit definite antitumor activity at a relatively low daily dose, and are highly potent, highly selective, and well-tolerated. Results from recent clinical phase III studies have confirmed their efficacy and the key role they have in the therapy for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. The agents available for clinical use are: letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane. These drugs have demonstrated high activity in women failing tamoxifen in locally advanced or metastatic disease. This communication reviews the clinical use of aromatase inhibitors, particularly in second and first line hormonal treatment of advanced breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Androstadienes/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Aromatase Inhibitors , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Estrogens , Neoplasm Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/drug therapy , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Triazoles/therapeutic use , Anastrozole , Androstadienes/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/enzymology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Double-Blind Method , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Letrozole , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/pathology , Nitriles/pharmacology , Postmenopause , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Triazoles/pharmacology
15.
Int J Biol Markers ; 14(4): 239-42, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10669952

ABSTRACT

A number of antiangiogenic agents have been developed as pharmaceuticals and are currently being tested in clinical studies. Potential strategies to enhance the activity of angiogenesis inhibitors could be to combine them, or better still, to administer them either sequentially or concurrently with cytotoxic drugs. Chemotherapy would be a more appropriate initial choice for patients with advanced disease since cytostatic agents can induce a fast regression of the tumor and cancer-related symptoms. Antiangiogenic treatment could be used after chemotherapy in patients who achieve disease remission to prolong the time to progression, the symptom-free interval and the overall survival. Antiangiogenic treatment is likely to attain an important role in the adjuvant setting. In fact, it could be used for prolonged periods after radical surgery to maintain dormancy of residual tumor cells. In spite of these promising preclinical data, several points need to be clarified before the initiation of clinical trials. In fact, certain misconceptions may interfere with their optimum design and result analysis.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Endothelial Growth Factors/biosynthesis , Humans , Lymphokines/biosynthesis , Neoplasms/blood supply , Neoplasms/metabolism , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...