Predicting wideband real-ear-to-coupler differences in children using wideband acoustic immittance.

Individual differences in ear-canal acoustics introduce variability into hearing aid output that can affect speech audibility. Measuring ear-canal acoustics in young children can be challenging, and relying on normative real-ear-to-coupler difference (RECD) transforms can lead to large fitting errors. Acoustic immittance measures characterize the impedance of the ear and are more easily measured than RECD. Using 226 Hz tympanometry to predict the RECD is more accurate than using age-based average RECD values. The current study sought to determine whether wideband acoustic immittance measurements could improve predictions of wideband real-ear-to-coupler difference (wRECD). 150 children ages 2-10 years with intact tympanic membranes underwent wRECD and wideband acoustic immittance measures in each ear. Three models were constructed to predict each child's measured wRECD: the age-based average wRECD, 226 Hz admittance wRECD, and wideband absorbance wRECD. The average age-based wRECD model predicted the child's measured wRECD within 3 dB in 62% of cases, but both the 226 Hz admittance and wideband absorbance wRECD were within 3 dB in 90% of cases. Using individual 226 Hz or wideband absorbance to predict wRECD improved the accuracy and precision of transforms used for pediatric hearing aid fitting.

Predicting children's real-ear-to-coupler differences based on tympanometric data.

OBJECTIVE: Paediatric hearing-aid verification relies on measures of output obtained from the ear canal or in a coupler with the child's real-ear-to-coupler difference (RECD). Measured RECD cannot always be completed in children, leading to fitting inaccuracies. Audiologists often have tympanometry data that characterises the child's ear-canal acoustics. The goal of this study was to determine if tympanometry can be used to improve predictions of measured RECD. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of RECD and admittance, tympanometric peak pressure, and equivalent ear-canal volume from 226 Hz tympanometry collected as part of a longitudinal study of children with hearing loss were modelled with Bayesian hierarchical regression. STUDY SAMPLE: Two-hundred sixty-six children with mild-to-severe hearing loss contributed data. RESULTS: Age-based average RECD models were within 3 dB of measured RECD values in 54% of cases with normal middle ear status and 50.6% of cases with abnormal middle ear status. Immittance-predicted RECD were within 3 dB in 69.6% of cases with normal middle ear status and 74.4% of cases with abnormal middle ear status. CONCLUSION: Immittance-predicted RECD was more accurate than age-based average RECD, particularly in children with abnormal middle ear status. The findings suggest that 226 Hz tympanometry could be used clinically to improve predictions of measured RECD when it cannot be measured.

Loss of high- or low-frequency audibility can partially explain effects of hearing loss on emotional responses to non-speech sounds.

Hearing loss can disrupt emotional responses to sound. However, the impact of stimulus modality (multisensory versus unisensory) on this disruption, and the underlying mechanisms responsible, are unclear. The purposes of this project were to evaluate the effects of stimulus modality and filtering on emotional responses to non-speech stimuli. It was hypothesized that low- and high-pass filtering would result in less extreme ratings, but only for unisensory stimuli. Twenty-four adults (22- 34 years old; 12 male) with normal hearing participated. Participants made ratings of valence and arousal in response to pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant non-speech sounds and/or pictures. Each participant completed ratings of five stimulus modalities: auditory-only, visual-only, auditory-visual, filtered auditory-only, and filtered auditory-visual. Half of the participants rated low-pass filtered stimuli (800 Hz cutoff), and half of the participants rated high-pass filtered stimuli (2000 Hz cutoff). Combining auditory and visual modalities resulted in more extreme (more pleasant and more unpleasant) ratings of valence in response to pleasant and unpleasant stimuli. In addition, low- and high-pass filtering of sounds resulted in less extreme ratings of valence (less pleasant and less unpleasant) and arousal (less exciting) in response to both auditory-only and auditory-visual stimuli. These results suggest that changes in audible spectral information are partially responsible for the noted changes in emotional responses to sound that accompany hearing loss. The findings also suggest the effects of hearing loss will generalize to multisensory stimuli if the stimuli include sound, although further work is warranted to confirm this in listeners with hearing loss.

Clinician, student and faculty perspectives on the audiology-industry interface: implications for ethics education.

Objective: Supporting audiologists to work ethically with industry requires theory-building research. This study sought to answer: How do audiologists view their relationship with industry in terms of ethical implications? What do audiologists do when faced with ethical tensions? How do social and systemic structures influence these views and actions? Design: A constructivist grounded theory study was conducted using semi-structured interviews of clinicians, students and faculty. Study sample: A purposive sample of 19 Canadian and American audiologists was recruited with representation across clinical, academic, educational and industry work settings. Theoretical sampling of grey literature occurred alongside audiologist sampling. Interpretations were informed by the concepts of ethical tensions as ethical uncertainty, dilemmas and distress. Results: Findings identified the audiology-industry relationship as symbiotic but not wholly positive. A range of responses included denying ethical tensions to avoiding any industry interactions altogether. Several of our participants who had experienced ethical distress quit their jobs to resolve the distress. Systemic influences included the economy, professional autonomy and the hidden curriculum. Conclusions: In direct response to our findings, the authors suggest a move to include virtues-based practice, an explicit curriculum for learning ethical industry relations, theoretically-aligned ethics education approaches and systemic and structural change.

The effects of digital signal processing features on children's speech recognition and loudness perception.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of hearing instruments set to Desired Sensation Level version 5 (DSL v5) hearing instrument prescription algorithm targets and equipped with directional microphones and digital noise reduction (DNR) on children's sentence recognition in noise performance and loudness perception in a classroom environment. METHOD: Ten children (ages 8-17 years) with stable, congenital sensorineural hearing losses participated in the study. Participants were fitted bilaterally with behind-the-ear hearing instruments set to DSL v5 prescriptive targets. Sentence recognition in noise was evaluated using the Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech in Noise Test (Niquette et al., 2003). Loudness perception was evaluated using a modified version of the Contour Test of Loudness Perception (Cox, Alexander, Taylor, & Gray, 1997). RESULTS: Children's sentence recognition in noise performance was significantly better when using directional microphones alone or in combination with DNR than when using omnidirectional microphones alone or in combination with DNR. Children's loudness ratings for sounds above 72 dB SPL were lowest when fitted with the DSL v5 Noise prescription combined with directional microphones. DNR use showed no effect on loudness ratings. CONCLUSION: Use of the DSL v5 Noise prescription with a directional microphone improved sentence recognition in noise performance and reduced loudness perception ratings for loud sounds relative to a typical clinical reference fitting with the DSL v5 Quiet prescription with no digital signal processing features enabled. Potential clinical strategies are discussed.

Children's speech recognition and loudness perception with the Desired Sensation Level v5 Quiet and Noise prescriptions.

PURPOSE: To determine whether Desired Sensation Level (DSL) v5 Noise is a viable hearing instrument prescriptive algorithm for children, in comparison with DSL v5 Quiet. In particular, the authors compared children's performance on measures of consonant recognition in quiet, sentence recognition in noise, and loudness perception when fitted with DSL v5 Quiet and Noise. METHOD: Eleven children (ages 8 to 17 years) with stable, congenital sensorineural hearing losses participated in the study. Participants were fitted bilaterally to DSL v5 prescriptions with behind-the-ear hearing instruments. The order of prescription was counterbalanced across participants. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare performance between prescriptions. RESULTS: Use of the Noise prescription resulted in a significant decrease in consonant perception in Quiet with low-level input, but no difference with average-level input. There was no significant difference in sentence-in-noise recognition between the two prescriptions. Loudness ratings for input levels above 72 dB SPL were significantly lower with the noise prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Average-level consonant recognition in quiet was preserved and aversive loudness was alleviated by the Noise prescription relative to the quiet prescription, which suggests that the DSL v5 Noise prescription may be an effective approach to managing the nonquiet listening needs of children with hearing loss.