ABSTRACT
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of operatively treated Mason Type III radial head fractures. Additionally, this project seeks to assess efficacy of PROMIS in evaluating post-operative outcomes for this patient population. Methods: A total of 143 patients who underwent operative treated Mason Type III radial head fractures were analyzed retrospectively. PROMIS physical function (PF), PROMIS upper extremity (UE), PROMIS pain interference (PI), demographic variables, and range of motion were collected and analyzed over 12-month follow-up. Results: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) was performed on 89 patients, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was performed on 47 patients, and radial head excision was performed on 7 patients. Among the RHA patients, PROMIS PF, PI and UE demonstrated a change of -1.33 (p < 0.05), -1.48 (p < 0.05), and 2.23 (p < 0.05) respectively from injury to 12-months. Among the ORIF patients, PROMIS PF, PI and UE demonstrated a change of 3.22 (p < 0.05), -1.56 (p < 0.05), and 2.09 (p < 0.05) respectively from injury to 12-months. At the pre-operative and 12-month visits, the RHA group demonstrated lower PROMIS PF scores 34.75 vs 38.02 (p < 0.05) and 33.42 vs 41.24 (p < 0.05) respectively. Ther was no difference in PROMIS PI, UE, or elbow range of motion between the two groups at 6- or 12-month follow-up (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Comparing the RHA and ORIF groups, there was no difference in PROMIS PI or UE scores nor was there a clinically significant improvement at the 6- or 12-month mark. The ORIF group demonstrated improved PROMIS PF at all follow-up periods and did show a clinically significant improvement. Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) correlated only with PROMIS UE at 6- and 12- months for both groups.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK), is an informative way to classify native knee alignment types, but does not consider posterior tibial slope, an important variable in knee kinematics. We hypothesized that tibial slope would have a significant effect on knee kinematics and warrant consideration in addition to the CPAK system. Methods: We examined 335 adult patients with osteoarthritis receiving total knee arthroplasty. We measured the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and posterior tibial slope angle (PTS). Knees were categorized into CPAK classes and subdivided into types 'A' (PTS 8°) or 'B' (PTS >8°). We recorded pre-and-post operative knee flexion, and extension/flexion gaps in all subjects. Results: CPAK classes VII-IX were not seen. Classes I and II comprised a plurality of all knees. One-third of all knees were type B. CPAK classes III, IV, and VI had greater type B proportions, but this was not statistically significant. Type B knees had greater flexion both pre-op (p < .001) and post-op (p = .043); type A knees had greater flexion improvement pre-to-post operatively (p = .045). Type A knees had greater medial and lateral flexion-extension gap change pre-operatively (p = .021) and (p = .027), respectively. Type B knees had greater medial-lateral gap imbalance preoperatively in both flexion and extension. Discussion/conclusion: Our results suggest that there are important pre and post-operative differences in medial and lateral femorotibial gap balance between type A and B knees that require consideration for intra-operative balancing. Differences in knee flexion further solidify that PTS is an important variable that affects kinematics before and after TKA. We propose the addition of PTS types A and B to the existing CPAK classes. This is an easy and logical way to create a comprehensive classification system in both coronal and sagittal planes that captures further differences in knee kinematics.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of Mason type I radial head fractures. This information will help to provide physicians with a critical decision-making tool when considering non-operative intervention and evaluate Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) as a potentially valuable measure to track outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 527 patients undergoing non-operative intervention. Demographic information, physical exam measurements, patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and PROMIS Upper Extremity (UE), Physical Function (PF), and Pain Interference (PI) scores were analyzed over 12 months. RESULTS: At the initial outpatient post-injury visit (within one week of injury), the average PROMIS PF, UE, PI, and Depression were 42.04 (SD: 6.3), 35.31 (SD: 7.3), 59.18 (SD: 9.2), and 48.68 (SD: 6.8), respectively. The average change in PROMIS PF, UE, PI, and Depression scores from the time of injury to six weeks were -0.23 (p=0.7), 1.43 (p=0.03), -2.1 (p=0.01), and -0.99 (p=0.1). The average change in PROMIS PF, UE, PI, and Depression scores from the time of injury to six months was -0.56 (p=0.56), 1.84 (p<0.001), -1.84 (p<0.001), and -0.13 (p=0.68). Among patients initially reporting "not acceptable" on PASS and reporting "acceptable" at the six-month visit, the average PROMIS PF, UE, PI, and Depression scores were 42.14, 38.91, 56.91, and 47.51 respectively. This represents an average difference of 1.11 (p=0.07), 2.82 (p<0.01), -1.19 (p=0.04), and -1.7 (p=0.01) respectively. CONCLUSION: PROMIS UE and PI significantly improved among Mason I radial head fractures treated non-operatively at both six-week and six-month follow-up points but did not meet the mean clinically important difference (MCID) PROMIS PF did not significantly differ between the time of injury, six-week or six-month follow-up points. Only PROMIS UE correlated with PASS at six-week and six-month follow-up. Among patients who improved from negative to positive responses on PASS, PROMIS UE, and PI significantly improved.
