Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mem Cognit ; 39(1): 63-74, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21264626

ABSTRACT

Previous research has found that pictures (e.g., a picture of an elephant) are remembered better than words (e.g., the word "elephant"), an empirical finding called the picture superiority effect (Paivio & Csapo. Cognitive Psychology 5(2):176-206, 1973). However, very little research has investigated such memory differences for other types of sensory stimuli (e.g. sounds or odors) and their verbal labels. Four experiments compared recall of environmental sounds (e.g., ringing) and spoken verbal labels of those sounds (e.g., "ringing"). In contrast to earlier studies that have shown no difference in recall of sounds and spoken verbal labels (Philipchalk & Rowe. Journal of Experimental Psychology 91(2):341-343, 1971; Paivio, Philipchalk, & Rowe. Memory & Cognition 3(6):586-590, 1975), the experiments reported here yielded clear evidence for an auditory analog of the picture superiority effect. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that sounds were recalled better than the verbal labels of those sounds. Experiment 2 also showed that verbal labels are recalled as well as sounds when participants imagine the sound that the word labels. Experiments 3 and 4 extended these findings to incidental-processing task paradigms and showed that the advantage of sounds over words is enhanced when participants are induced to label the sounds.


Subject(s)
Attention , Auditory Perception , Mental Recall , Pattern Recognition, Visual , Semantics , Speech Perception , Humans , Imagination , Psychoacoustics , Verbal Learning
2.
Behav Res Methods ; 39(2): 167-74, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17695342

ABSTRACT

A new computer software tool for coding and analyzing verbal report data is described. Combining and extending the capabilities of earlier verbal report coding software tools, CAPAS 2.0 enables researchers to code two different types of verbal report data: (1) verbal reports already transcribed and stored in text files and (2) verbal reports in their original digitally recorded audio format. For both types of data, individual verbal report segments are presented in random order and coded independently of other segments in accordance with a localized encoding principle. Once all reports are coded, CAPAS 2.0 converts the coded reports to a formatted file suitable for analysis by statistical packages such as SPSS.


Subject(s)
Data Collection/instrumentation , Electronic Data Processing/methods , Information Storage and Retrieval/methods , Psychology/instrumentation , Software , Electronic Data Processing/instrumentation , Forms and Records Control , Humans , Psychology/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Speech Recognition Software , Tape Recording
3.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput ; 35(2): 263-8, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12834083

ABSTRACT

The increasing use of verbal reports in psychological research requires tools for improving the ease and reliability of collecting and coding verbal report data. An approach is described that maintains the verbal report data in digitally recorded audio form throughout the collecting and encoding processes. A new computer-aided encoding tool, CAPAS, is described, which randomly selects and plays individual protocol segments and stores computer keyboard-entered codes in an SPSS-formatted data file.


Subject(s)
Data Collection/instrumentation , Electronic Data Processing/methods , Information Storage and Retrieval/methods , Psychology/methods , Software , Electronic Data Processing/instrumentation , Psychology/instrumentation , Records , Reproducibility of Results , Research Design , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , User-Computer Interface , Voice
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...