ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of biologic markers to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may permit tailoring regimens to achieve maximal tumor response. Taxanes have demonstrated excellent activity in breast carcinoma; however, tumor-specific factors that predict clinical response have not been characterized thoroughly. METHODS: The authors performed a historic review evaluating the association of tumor prognostic factors and response to neoadjuvant cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin (AC) with or without docetaxel (D) (AC vs. AC+D) in 121 women who previously were enrolled in a Phase III, randomized, clinical trial. Using pretreatment biopsy materials, immunohistochemical studies were performed for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER-2/neu, p53, and Ki-67. Outcome variables were pathologic complete response (pCR) and positive clinical response (cPOS), which was defined as a >/= 50% regression in clinical tumor size prior to surgery. RESULTS: In a multivariate analysis that controlled for tumor size and lymph node status, improved cPOS rates were observed with the addition of docetaxel in women with HER-2/neu-negative tumors (81% vs. 51%; P < 0.05), yielding an adjusted odds ratio of 3.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-13.0) in favor of docetaxel. Women who had HER-2/neu-negative tumors appeared to have a lower response rate with AC alone compared with women who had HER-2/neu-positive tumors (51% vs. 75%; P = 0.06), but response rates were matched when docetaxel was added (81% vs. 78%; P = 0.99). ER, PR, p53, and Ki-67 results were not associated significantly with response rates. CONCLUSIONS: HER-2/neu status may predict improved clinical response rates from the addition of docetaxel to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Docetaxel may "rescue" the response in women who have HER-2/neu-negative tumors to match that observed in women who have HER-2/neu-positive tumors treated with AC alone.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Docetaxel , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Ki-67 Antigen/metabolism , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Survival Rate , Taxoids/administration & dosage , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Histologic margin positivity represents a significant source of adverse clinical outcome affecting breast conservation therapy for in situ or invasive malignancy. Elucidation of factors associated with positive margin status might clarify and improve local therapy strategies. In order to define our experience with margin positivity and to identify relevant pathologic criteria, we retrospectively analyzed the cases of 143 patients who underwent resections for carcinoma with intent of breast conservation between 1995 and 1999. METHODS: Histologic features and indices of biologic aggressiveness were compared among tumors resected with positive versus negative margins in order to determine whether such markers could be used to anticipate outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-eight pathologic specimens were identified to possess histologically positive margins. Twenty-six patients underwent additional operative procedures. Of the 26 re-excision specimens, 17 (65%) contained residual malignancy. Statistical analysis demonstrated that margin positivity correlated with in situ histology and with Her 2/neu positivity. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest certain pathologic factors that may portend difficulty in achieving negative resection margins in patients in whom breast conservation therapy is considered.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/chemistry , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/chemistry , Female , Humans , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis , Mastectomy, Segmental , Middle Aged , Neoplasm, Residual , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are becoming established components of therapy for selected patients with breast carcinoma. However, neoadjuvant therapy has been considered a relative contraindication to SLNM. In an effort to learn whether patients who have received preoperative chemotherapy can undergo accurate SLNM, we evaluated our experience with this technique. METHODS: From January 1997 to June 2000, SLNM and axillary lymph node dissection were concurrently performed in 35 patients who received preoperative chemotherapy. Mapping was performed with (99m)Tc sulfur colloid only in one patient and Lymphazurin dye only in 15 patients, and the two methods were combined in the remainder. RESULTS: SLNM successfully identified a sentinel lymph node in 30 (86%) patients. Metastatic disease was identified in the sentinel lymph nodes of four patients during surgery. The intraoperative pathologic diagnosis proved to be correct in 19 (79%) of 24 patients. The final pathologic diagnosis of the sentinel lymph node reflected the status of the axillary contents in all patients in whom it was identified. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that SLNM can be consistently performed in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer, suggesting the utility of this technique in this patient population.
