RNA-Puzzles Round II: assessment of RNA structure prediction programs applied to three large RNA structures.

This paper is a report of a second round of RNA-Puzzles, a collective and blind experiment in three-dimensional (3D) RNA structure prediction. Three puzzles, Puzzles 5, 6, and 10, represented sequences of three large RNA structures with limited or no homology with previously solved RNA molecules. A lariat-capping ribozyme, as well as riboswitches complexed to adenosylcobalamin and tRNA, were predicted by seven groups using RNAComposer, ModeRNA/SimRNA, Vfold, Rosetta, DMD, MC-Fold, 3dRNA, and AMBER refinement. Some groups derived models using data from state-of-the-art chemical-mapping methods (SHAPE, DMS, CMCT, and mutate-and-map). The comparisons between the predictions and the three subsequently released crystallographic structures, solved at diffraction resolutions of 2.5-3.2 Å, were carried out automatically using various sets of quality indicators. The comparisons clearly demonstrate the state of present-day de novo prediction abilities as well as the limitations of these state-of-the-art methods. All of the best prediction models have similar topologies to the native structures, which suggests that computational methods for RNA structure prediction can already provide useful structural information for biological problems. However, the prediction accuracy for non-Watson-Crick interactions, key to proper folding of RNAs, is low and some predicted models had high Clash Scores. These two difficulties point to some of the continuing bottlenecks in RNA structure prediction. All submitted models are available for download at http://ahsoka.u-strasbg.fr/rnapuzzles/.

RNA-Puzzles: a CASP-like evaluation of RNA three-dimensional structure prediction.

We report the results of a first, collective, blind experiment in RNA three-dimensional (3D) structure prediction, encompassing three prediction puzzles. The goals are to assess the leading edge of RNA structure prediction techniques; compare existing methods and tools; and evaluate their relative strengths, weaknesses, and limitations in terms of sequence length and structural complexity. The results should give potential users insight into the suitability of available methods for different applications and facilitate efforts in the RNA structure prediction community in ongoing efforts to improve prediction tools. We also report the creation of an automated evaluation pipeline to facilitate the analysis of future RNA structure prediction exercises.

Identification and annotation of noncoding RNAs in Saccharomycotina.

The importance of ncRNAs in biological processes makes their annotation an essential component of any genome-sequencing project. The identification of ncRNAs in genomes requires specific expertise and tools that are distinct from the traditional protein gene annotation tools. Here, we describe the assembly of two automatic annotation pipelines, integrating publicly available tools, for homology and de novo ncRNA search in genomes. We applied both pipelines to 10 Saccharomycotina genomes and were able to find and annotate 693 ncRNA genes, corresponding to 81% of the ncRNAs expected for those genomes assuming the number of ncRNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (86) as a reference. Several new ncRNAs, not yet known in the Saccharomycotina clade, were also detected. The results show the feasibility of automatic search for ncRNAs in full genomes and the utility of such approaches in large multi-genome sequencing and annotation projects.

Sequence-based identification of 3D structural modules in RNA with RMDetect.

Structural RNA modules, sets of ordered non-Watson-Crick base pairs embedded between Watson-Crick pairs, have central roles as architectural organizers and sites of ligand binding in RNA molecules, and are recurrently observed in RNA families throughout the phylogeny. Here we describe a computational tool, RNA three-dimensional (3D) modules detection, or RMDetect, for identifying known 3D structural modules in single and multiple RNA sequences in the absence of any other information. Currently, four modules can be searched for: G-bulge loop, kink-turn, C-loop and tandem-GA loop. In control test sequences we found all of the known modules with a false discovery rate of 0.23. Scanning through 1,444 publicly available alignments, we identified 21 yet unreported modules and 141 known modules. RMDetect can be used to refine RNA 2D structure, assemble RNA 3D models, and search and annotate structured RNAs in genomic data.

New metrics for comparing and assessing discrepancies between RNA 3D structures and models.

To benchmark progress made in RNA three-dimensional modeling and assess newly developed techniques, reliable and meaningful comparison metrics and associated tools are necessary. Generally, the average root-mean-square deviations (RMSDs) are quoted. However, RMSD can be misleading since errors are spread over the whole molecule and do not account for the specificity of RNA base interactions. Here, we introduce two new metrics that are particularly suitable to RNAs: the deformation index and deformation profile. The deformation index is calibrated by the interaction network fidelity, which considers base-base-stacking and base-base-pairing interactions within the target structure. The deformation profile highlights dissimilarities between structures at the nucleotide scale for both intradomain and interdomain interactions. Our results show that there is little correlation between RMSD and interaction network fidelity. The deformation profile is a tool that allows for rapid assessment of the origins of discrepancies.

The dynamic landscapes of RNA architecture.

A wealth of information on RNA folding and ribonucleoprotein assembly has emerged from analyses of structures and from the use of innovative biophysical tools. Although integrating data obtained from static structures with dynamic measurements presents major challenges, such efforts are opening new vistas on the RNA folding landscape.