Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 30
Filter
2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(15)2021 Jul 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34360795

ABSTRACT

Specific anti-tumor immune responses have proven to be pivotal in shaping tumorigenesis and tumor progression in solid cancers. These responses can also be of an autoimmune nature, and autoantibodies can sometimes be present even before the onset of clinically overt disease. Autoantibodies can be generated due to mutated gene products, aberrant expression and post-transcriptional modification of proteins, a pro-immunogenic milieu, anti-cancer treatments, cross-reactivity of tumor-specific lymphocytes, epitope spreading, and microbiota-related and genetic factors. Understanding these responses has implications for both basic and clinical immunology. Autoantibodies in solid cancers can be used for early detection of cancer as well as for biomarkers of prognosis and treatment response. High-throughput techniques such as protein microarrays make parallel detection of multiple autoantibodies for increased specificity and sensitivity feasible, affordable, and quick. Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatments and has made a considerable impact on reducing cancer-associated morbidity and mortality. However, immunotherapeutic interventions such as immune checkpoint inhibition can induce immune-related toxicities, which can even be life-threatening. Uncovering the reasons for treatment-induced autoimmunity can lead to fine-tuning of cancer immunotherapy approaches to evade toxic events while inducing an effective anti-tumor immune response.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/immunology , Autoimmunity/drug effects , Biomarkers, Tumor/immunology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Neoplasms , Animals , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/immunology , Neoplasms/therapy
3.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(11)2021 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34072782

ABSTRACT

Sporadic Colorectal Cancer (sCRC) is the third leading cause of cancer death in the Western world, and the sCRC patients presenting with synchronic metastasis have the poorest prognosis. Genetic alterations accumulated in sCRC tumor cells translate into mutated proteins and/or abnormal protein expression levels, which contribute to the development of sCRC. Then, the tumor-associated proteins (TAAs) might induce the production of auto-antibodies (aAb) via humoral immune response. Here, Nucleic Acid Programmable Protein Arrays (NAPPArray) are employed to identify aAb in plasma samples from a set of 50 sCRC patients compared to seven healthy donors. Our goal was to establish a systematic workflow based on NAPPArray to define differential aAb profiles between healthy individuals and sCRC patients as well as between non-metastatic (n = 38) and metastatic (n = 12) sCRC, in order to gain insight into the role of the humoral immune system in controlling the development and progression of sCRC. Our results showed aAb profile based on 141 TAA including TAAs associated with biological cellular processes altered in genesis and progress of sCRC (e.g., FSCN1, VTI2 and RPS28) that discriminated healthy donors vs. sCRC patients. In addition, the potential capacity of discrimination (between non-metastatic vs. metastatic sCRC) of 7 TAAs (USP5, ML4, MARCKSL1, CKMT1B, HMOX2, VTI2, TP53) have been analyzed individually in an independent cohort of sCRC patients, where two of them (VTI2 and TP53) were validated (AUC ~75%). In turn, these findings provided novel insights into the immunome of sCRC, in combination with transcriptomics profiles and protein antigenicity characterizations, wich might lead to the identification of novel sCRC biomarkers that might be of clinical utility for early diagnosis of the tumor. These results explore the immunomic analysis as potent source for biomarkers with diagnostic and prognostic value in CRC. Additional prospective studies in larger series of patients are required to confirm the clinical utility of these novel sCRC immunomic biomarkers.

4.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 17(8): e1162-e1169, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33621121

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Measuring and tracking quality of care is highly relevant in today's health care. The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) program is a referral for evaluating oncology practices worldwide. Excellence and Quality in Oncology Foundation, a collaboration of oncology experts from major Spanish hospitals involved in cancer treatment, reached an agreement with QOPI to include Spanish hospitals in this program. METHODS: We analyzed the results of the QOPI Core module measures from 19 Spanish hospitals over nine rounds (from fall 2015 to fall 2019). RESULTS: Of the 19 hospitals, 15 completed more than one round; none participated in all nine (two hospitals participated in eight rounds). The highest scores were for pathology report confirming malignancy, documenting a plan of care for moderate or severe pain and chemotherapy dose, and chemotherapy administered to patients with metastatic solid tumor with performance status undocumented. Measures regarding a summary of chemotherapy treatment, tobacco use cessation counseling, and assessment of patient emotional well-being were among the lowest scored measures. Six of the 15 practices that participated repeatedly achieved a better score in their last round compared with their first. Overall, scores of Spanish hospitals improved from 67.79% in fall 2015 to 68.91% in fall 2019. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate QOPI scores in Spain. There was high variability in scores, with quality of care improving with repeated participation in some hospitals, but worsening in others. Excellence and Quality in Oncology Foundation will support practices to increase their participation to improve oncology care and implement strategies that address the areas for improvement.


Subject(s)
Medical Oncology , Neoplasms , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Spain
6.
Br J Cancer ; 119(9): 1052-1059, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30131546

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite most metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients benefit from abiraterone acetate plus prednisone 5 mg bid (AA + P), resistance eventually occurs. Long-term use of prednisone has been suggested as one of the mechanisms driving resistance, which may be reversed by switching to another steroid. METHODS: SWITCH was a single-arm, open-label, single-stage phase II study. The primary objective was to evaluate the antitumour activity of abiraterone acetate plus dexamethasone 0.5 mg daily (AA + D) in mCRPC patients progressing to AA + P. Clinically stable mCRPC patients who had prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or limited radiographic progression after at least 12 weeks on AA + P, were eligible. The primary endpoint was measured as the proportion of patients achieving a PSA decline of ≥ 30% (PSA30) from baseline after 6 weeks on AA + D. Secondary endpoints included: PSA50 response rate at 12 weeks, time to biochemical and radiological progression, overall survival, safety profile evaluation, benefit from subsequent treatment lines and the identification of biomarkers of response (AR copy number, TMPRSS2-ERG status and PTEN expression). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled. PSA30 and PSA50 were 46.2% and 34.6%, respectively. Median time to biochemical and radiological progression were 5.3 and 11.8 months, respectively. Two radiological responses were observed. Median overall survival was 20.9 months. Patients with AR gain detected in plasma circulating tumour DNA did not respond to switch, whereas patients with AR normal status benefited the most. No significant toxicities were observed and PSA50 response rate to subsequent taxane was 50%. CONCLUSIONS: In selected clinical stable mCRPC patients with limited disease progression on AA + P, a steroid switch from prednisone to dexamethasone can lead to PSA and radiological responses.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Androstenes/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , PTEN Phosphohydrolase/genetics , Pilot Projects , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/metabolism , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
7.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 20(8): 1061-1071, ago. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-173690

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To monitor oncologists’ perspective on cancer pain management. Methods: An anonymized survey was conducted in two waves. First, over a convenience sample of oncologists known to be particularly concerned with the management of pain. Second, using a random sample of oncologists. Results: In total, 73 and 82 oncologists participated in the first and second wave, respectively. Many oncologists reported to have good knowledge of analgesic drugs (95.9%), the mechanism of action of opioids (79.5%), and good skills to manage opioid-related bowel dysfunction (76.7%). Appropriate adjustment of background medication to manage breakthrough pain was reported by 95.5% of oncologists. Additionally, 87.7% (68.3% in the second wave, p = 0.035) of oncologists reported suitable opioid titration practices, and 90.4% reported to use co-adjuvant medications for neuropathic pain confidently. On the other hand, just 9.6% of oncologists participated in multidisciplinary pain management teams, and merely 30.3 and 27.1% reported to routinely collaborate with the Pain Clinics or involve other staff, respectively. Only 26.4% of the oncologists of the second wave gave priority to pain pathophysiology to decide therapies, and up to 75.6% reported difficulties in treating neuropathic pain. Significantly less oncologists of the second wave (82.9 vs. 94.5%, p = 0.001) used opioid rotation routinely. Conclusions: Unlike in previous surveys, medical oncologists reported in general good knowledge and few perceived limitations and barriers for pain management. However, multi-disciplinary management and collaboration with other specialists are still uncommon. Oncologists’ commitment to optimize pain management seems important to improve and maintain good practices


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Cancer Pain/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/complications , Analgesia/methods , Pain Management/methods , Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Oncologists/statistics & numerical data
8.
Oncotarget ; 9(35): 24081-24096, 2018 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29844874

ABSTRACT

The prognostic impact of KRAS mutations and other KRAS-related and non-related genes such as BRAF, NRAS and TP53, on sporadic colorectal cancer (sCRC) remain controversial and/or have not been fully established. Here we investigated the frequency of such mutations in primary sCRC tumors and their impact on patient progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Primary tumor tissues from 87 sCRC patients were analysed using a custom-built next generation sequencing (NGS) panel to assess the hotspot mutated regions of KRAS/NRAS (exons 2, 3 and 4), BRAF (exon 15) and TP53 (all exons). Overall, mutations in these genes were detected in 46/87 sCRC tumors analyzed (53%) with the following frequencies per gene: TP53, 33%; KRAS, 28%; BRAF, 7%; and NRAS, 1%. A significant association was found between KRAS mutations and right side colon tumor location (p=0.05), well-differentiated tumors (p=0.04) and absence of lymphovascular invasion (p=0.05). In turn, BRAF-mutated tumors frequently corresponded to poorly- or moderately-differentiated sCRC (p=0.02) and showed a higher frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis (p=0.006) and microsatellite instability (p=0.007). From the prognostic point of view, the BRAF mutational status together with the TNM stage were the only variables that showed an independent adverse impact on patient outcome in the multivariate analyses for both PFS and OS. Based on these results a scoring system was built and patients were classified into three prognostic subgroups with different PFS rates at 2 years: 91% vs. 77% vs. 0%, respectively (p<0.0001). Additional prospective studies in larger series of sCRC patients where mutations in genes other than those investigated here are required to validate the utility of the proposed predictive model.

9.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 20(8): 1061-1071, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29721765

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To monitor oncologists' perspective on cancer pain management. METHODS: An anonymized survey was conducted in two waves. First, over a convenience sample of oncologists known to be particularly concerned with the management of pain. Second, using a random sample of oncologists. RESULTS: In total, 73 and 82 oncologists participated in the first and second wave, respectively. Many oncologists reported to have good knowledge of analgesic drugs (95.9%), the mechanism of action of opioids (79.5%), and good skills to manage opioid-related bowel dysfunction (76.7%). Appropriate adjustment of background medication to manage breakthrough pain was reported by 95.5% of oncologists. Additionally, 87.7% (68.3% in the second wave, p = 0.035) of oncologists reported suitable opioid titration practices, and 90.4% reported to use co-adjuvant medications for neuropathic pain confidently. On the other hand, just 9.6% of oncologists participated in multidisciplinary pain management teams, and merely 30.3 and 27.1% reported to routinely collaborate with the Pain Clinics or involve other staff, respectively. Only 26.4% of the oncologists of the second wave gave priority to pain pathophysiology to decide therapies, and up to 75.6% reported difficulties in treating neuropathic pain. Significantly less oncologists of the second wave (82.9 vs. 94.5%, p = 0.001) used opioid rotation routinely. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike in previous surveys, medical oncologists reported in general good knowledge and few perceived limitations and barriers for pain management. However, multi-disciplinary management and collaboration with other specialists are still uncommon. Oncologists' commitment to optimize pain management seems important to improve and maintain good practices.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Attitude of Health Personnel , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Neoplasms/complications , Oncologists/psychology , Pain/drug therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Medical Oncology , Middle Aged , Pain/etiology , Pain Management , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Enferm. infecc. microbiol. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 35(7): 452-460, ago.-sept. 2017. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-165244

ABSTRACT

Un grupo de expertos de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC) y de la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM) han revisado en este documento los principales aspectos que deben considerarse en la evaluación de los pacientes con cáncer sólido y complicaciones infecciosas. Para ello se han establecido unas recomendaciones sobre la profilaxis de las infecciones más prevalentes en estos pacientes, el uso de vacunas, las medidas de control de la infección por catéteres vasculares y la prevención de la infección ante determinadas maniobras quirúrgicas. A continuación, se han revisado los criterios de manejo de la neutropenia febril y del uso de factores estimulantes de colonias, para terminar dando una serie de pautas sobre el tratamiento del paciente oncológico con infección grave. El documento se completa con una serie de medidas para el control de la infección hospitalaria (AU)


A group of experts from the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) have reviewed in this paper the main aspects to be considered in the evaluation of patients with solid cancer and infectious diseases. They have established a series of recommendations on the prevention of the most prevalent infections in these patients, the use of vaccines, the control measures of vascular catheter infection and prevention of infections before certain surgical procedures. Also the criteria for management of febrile neutropenia and the use of colony-stimulating factors were revised. Finally they provide a series of recommendations for the treatment of cancer patients with severe infection. The document is completed with a series of measures for the control of hospital infection (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Febrile Neutropenia/therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Communicable Diseases/drug therapy , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Risk Factors , Vaccination
11.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 35(7): 451-460, 2017.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26279208

ABSTRACT

A group of experts from the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) have reviewed in this paper the main aspects to be considered in the evaluation of patients with solid cancer and infectious diseases. They have established a series of recommendations on the prevention of the most prevalent infections in these patients, the use of vaccines, the control measures of vascular catheter infection and prevention of infections before certain surgical procedures. Also the criteria for management of febrile neutropenia and the use of colony-stimulating factors were revised. Finally they provide a series of recommendations for the treatment of cancer patients with severe infection. The document is completed with a series of measures for the control of hospital infection.


Subject(s)
Febrile Neutropenia/etiology , Febrile Neutropenia/therapy , Infections/etiology , Infections/therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Algorithms , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic
12.
Br J Cancer ; 114(11): 1191-8, 2016 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27187687

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We sought to develop and externally validate a nomogram and web-based calculator to individually predict the development of serious complications in seemingly stable adult patients with solid tumours and episodes of febrile neutropenia (FN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data from the FINITE study (n=1133) and University of Salamanca Hospital (USH) FN registry (n=296) were used to develop and validate this tool. The main eligibility criterion was the presence of apparent clinical stability, defined as events without acute organ dysfunction, abnormal vital signs, or major infections. Discriminatory ability was measured as the concordance index and stratification into risk groups. RESULTS: The rate of infection-related complications in the FINITE and USH series was 13.4% and 18.6%, respectively. The nomogram used the following covariates: Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) Performance Status ⩾2, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic cardiovascular disease, mucositis of grade ⩾2 (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria), monocytes <200/mm(3), and stress-induced hyperglycaemia. The nomogram predictions appeared to be well calibrated in both data sets (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P>0.1). The concordance index was 0.855 and 0.831 in each series. Risk group stratification revealed a significant distinction in the proportion of complications. With a ⩾116-point cutoff, the nomogram yielded the following prognostic indices in the USH registry validation series: 66% sensitivity, 83% specificity, 3.88 positive likelihood ratio, 48% positive predictive value, and 91% negative predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed and externally validated a nomogram and web calculator to predict serious complications that can potentially impact decision-making in patients with seemingly stable FN.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Febrile Neutropenia/complications , Hyperglycemia/epidemiology , Infections/epidemiology , Mucositis/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Nomograms , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Adult , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Likelihood Functions , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/immunology , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Registries , Sensitivity and Specificity
13.
Gene ; 536(1): 79-83, 2014 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24325908

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults. Despite several factors such as ionizing radiation exposure or rare genetic syndromes have been associated with the development of glioblastoma, no underlying cause has been identified for the majority of cases. We thus aimed to investigate the role of DNA repair polymorphisms in modulating glioblastoma risk. METHODS: Genotypic and allelic frequencies of seven common polymorphisms in DNA repair genes involved in nucleotide excision repair (ERCC1 rs11615, ERCC2 rs13181, ERCC6 rs4253079), base excision repair (APEX1 rs1130409, XRCC1 rs25487), double-strand break repair (XRCC3 rs861539) and mismatch repair (MLH1 rs1800734) pathways were analyzed in 115 glioblastoma patients and 200 healthy controls. Haplotype analysis was also performed for ERCC1 rs11615 and ERCC2 rs13181 polymorphisms, located on the same chromosomal region (19q13.32). RESULTS: Our results indicated that carriers of the ERCC2 Gln/Gln genotype were associated with a lower glioblastoma risk (OR=0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.89; P=0.028), whereas carriers of the MLH1 AA genotype were associated with an increased risk of glioblastoma (OR=3.14, 95% CI 1.09-9.06; P=0.034). Furthermore, the haplotype containing the C allele of ERCC2 rs13181 polymorphism and the T allele of ERCC1 rs11615 polymorphism was significantly associated with a protective effect of developing glioblastoma (OR=0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.71; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: These results pointed out that MLH1 rs1800734 and ERCC2 rs13181 polymorphisms might constitute glioblastoma susceptibility factors, and also suggested that the chromosomal region 19q could be important in glioblastoma pathogenesis.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/genetics , DNA Repair/genetics , Glioblastoma/genetics , Polymorphism, Genetic , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , DNA Mutational Analysis , Female , Gene Frequency , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Glioblastoma/epidemiology , Haplotypes , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
14.
PLoS One ; 8(9): e76401, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24073290

ABSTRACT

Malignant astrocytomas are the most aggressive primary brain tumors with a poor prognosis despite optimal treatment. Dysfunction of mismatch repair (MMR) system accelerates the accumulation of mutations throughout the genome causing uncontrolled cell growth. The aim of this study was to characterize the MMR system defects that could be involved in malignant astrocytoma pathogenesis. We analyzed protein expression and promoter methylation of MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 as well as microsatellite instability (MSI) and MMR gene mutations in a set of 96 low- and high-grade astrocytomas. Forty-one astrocytomas failed to express at least one MMR protein. Loss of MSH2 expression was more frequent in low-grade astrocytomas. Loss of MLH1 expression was associated with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and MLH1-93G>A promoter polymorphism. However, MSI was not related with MMR protein expression and only 5% of tumors were MSI-High. Furthermore, the incidence of tumors carrying germline mutations in MMR genes was low and only one glioblastoma was associated with Lynch syndrome. Interestingly, survival analysis identified that tumors lacking MSH6 expression presented longer overall survival in high-grade astrocytoma patients treated only with radiotherapy while MSH6 expression did not modify the prognosis of those patients treated with both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Our findings suggest that MMR system alterations are a frequent event in malignant astrocytomas and might help to define a subgroup of patients with different outcome.


Subject(s)
Astrocytoma/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , DNA Methylation , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics , DNA Repair Enzymes/genetics , DNA Repair Enzymes/metabolism , Mutation/genetics , Adult , Aged , Astrocytoma/metabolism , Astrocytoma/mortality , Astrocytoma/pathology , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Male , Microsatellite Instability , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Prognosis , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Survival Rate , Tissue Array Analysis
15.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 15(1): 20-5, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22911548

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 5 % of all cancer cases are hereditary. Cancer genetic counseling assesses individual and family risks of cancer, conducts genetic studies, interprets results, and advises patients regarding strategies for prevention and risk reduction. Currently, many networks of hereditary cancer genetic counseling units (HCGCUs) are integrated in the medical oncology services of most Spanish hospitals, which are comprised of multidisciplinary teams and offer high-quality care for the treatment of hereditary cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) analyzed key issues involving the integration of HCGCUs into the National Health Service. These included basic compliance issues by these units regarding their operation and organization, as well as prerequisites in quality control thereof. RESULTS: This document describes the specific roles and clinical processes performed in HCGCUs in addition to basic services provided by molecular diagnostic laboratories. It also provides a summary on the coordination of care across different levels for patients and families with hereditary cancers. Finally, this document describes the human and material resources needed for the organization of HCGCUs. CONCLUSIONS: SEOM has been a pioneer in the creation and development of HCGCUs. This paper seeks to ensure high-quality care to individuals and families with inherited susceptibility to cancer in Spain.


Subject(s)
Genetic Counseling/organization & administration , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/genetics , Early Detection of Cancer , Genetic Counseling/methods , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Risk Assessment , Societies, Medical , Spain
16.
J Pain Res ; 5: 559-66, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23204865

ABSTRACT

Breakthrough cancer pain is defined as transient pain exacerbation in patients with stable and controlled basal pain. Although variable, the prevalence of breakthrough cancer pain is high (33%-95%). According to the American Pain Foundation, breakthrough pain is observed in 50%-90% of all hospitalized cancer patients, in 89% of all patients admitted to homes for the elderly and terminal-patient care centers, and in 35% of all ambulatory care cancer patients. The management of breakthrough cancer pain should involve an interdisciplinary and multimodal approach. The introduction of new fentanyl formulations has represented a great advance and has notably improved treatment. Among these, the pectin-based intranasal formulation adjusts very well to the profile of breakthrough pain attacks, is effective, has a good toxicity profile, and allows for convenient dosing - affording rapid and effective analgesia with the added advantage of being easily administered by caregivers when patients are unable to collaborate.

17.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 14(11): 820-6, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22855162

ABSTRACT

New advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and the increased incidence and prevalence of this disease have led to an increase in the number and duration of visits in Medical Oncology in the last few years. Based on the functions of a medical oncologist and the time recommended for each work activity established by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), we carried out a pilot study on the three most frequent neoplasias in our country [breast cancer (BC), lung cancer (LC) and colorectal cancer (CRC)], in order to determine the real time each patient requires from a physician and thus establish a recommendation on the number of medical oncologists necessary. Using the actual itinerary of the first 20 patients of 2009 in each of the three neoplasias seen at the Medical Oncology Service of the Virgen de Valme University Hospital, we measured the number of visits, the antineoplastic treatments received, the number of hospital admissions and average length of stay. During the years following the study, these data were estimated based on the natural history of each neoplasia. During the first year, the average time spent by the medical oncologist was 235, 390 and 265 min on each outpatient with BC, LC and CRC, respectively. In hospitalisation, the average oncologist/patient minutes were 40, 360 and 118 for BC, LC and CRC, respectively. Finally, the time spent on each visit or day of hospitalisation was that recommended by the SEOM, achieving an ultimate ratio of 1 oncologist for every 83 first visits.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Lung Neoplasms , Oncology Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Workload , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Colorectal Neoplasms/economics , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/economics , Office Visits/trends , Pilot Projects
18.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 14(6): 423-9, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22634530

ABSTRACT

The functions and workload of medical oncologists are becoming increasingly relevant as cancer is a priority health issue in our country. Taking into account the specific characteristics and complexity of caring for cancer patients, the time of physicians attached to Medical Oncology could be distributed as follows: 70% for consultation (including participation in tumour committees and multidisciplinary units), 15% for research and 15% for training, teaching and clinical sessions. The time distribution for Heads of Services or Heads of Units is different, since it must also include their clinical management tasks, team coordination, and relations with other services and institutions. The average time, calculated in minutes, spent on each activity per patient is as follows: first visit and "second visit or results visit" 60-90 min; successive visits at the day hospital 15 min; successive visits of patients for follow-up or checkups 20 min; visits with family members 15-20 min; telephone or e-mail consultations 5-10 min; hospitalisation 20 min; and interconsultation 30-60 min. Also, participation in multidisciplinary committees takes up 60-120 min of an oncologist's time each week. When new technologies such as electronic medical records, e-mail and other software are used, these times increase with a correction factor that is still to be defined and which could vary according to the centre. Finally, the ratio recommended by SEOM is one medical oncologist for every 83 new patients a year.


Subject(s)
Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Physicians/organization & administration , Workload/standards , Humans , Spain , Workforce
19.
Rev. esp. patol ; 45(1): 58-63, ene.-mar. 2012.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-96577

ABSTRACT

Los carcinomas mioepiteliales de partes blandas (STMM), afectan a las extremidades o cinturas de pacientes jóvenes y evolucionan agresivamente. Muestran una marcada atipia y bordes infiltrantes y su pronóstico empeora con el reordenamiento del gen EWSR1, presente en el 45% de los casos. Presentamos el caso de un varón de 26 años al que se le extirpó un STMM situado en la cadera derecha, compuesto por cordones y nidos sólidos de células atípicas rodeadas de un estroma mixoide-hialino, sin diferenciación ductal. Expresaban citoqueratinas, EMA, S100 y calponina. La hibridación in situ fluorescente (FISH) no reveló reordenamientos del gen EWSR1. Tras recibir cuidados paliativos, el paciente murió por múltiples metástasis a los 18 meses del diagnóstico. Se trata de un caso de STMM sin reordenamiento del gen EWRS1 pero inusualmente agresivo(AU)


Soft tissue myoepithelial carcinomas (STMM) are clinically aggressive tumors that arise in the extremities and limb girdles of young patients. Histologically, they show moderate to severe atypia and infiltrative margins. EWSR1-gene rearrangements are present in 45% of cases and are associated with increased malignancy. A large mass in the right hip of a 26-year-old male that had been surgically removed showed strands of cells embedded in a hyalin-myxoid matrix without ductal differentiation. Cells expressed cytokeratins, EMA, S-100 protein and calponin. STMM was diagnosed. Although the tumor did not have an EWSR1 gene rearrangement, it behaved aggressively and the patient died from multiple metastases 18 months after diagnosis(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Myoepithelioma/genetics , Myoepithelioma/pathology , Prognosis , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/complications , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Immunohistochemistry , Diagnosis, Differential
20.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 13(8): 574-9, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21821493

ABSTRACT

Although thyroid cancer represents less than 1% of malignant tumours, its increased incidence detected in recent years and the appearance and development of new drugs targeting specific molecular targets has attracted the attention of the doctors involved in this pathology, especially medical oncologists. For this reason it is important at this critical point, when treatment may be substantially changed, to establish and agree updated guidelines. These guidelines should incorporate the newly developed strategies that, although still preliminary in evidence level, will surely have an important role, especially in relapsed and refractory tumours, which are unsuitable for surgical or radio-iodine treatment. Particular histological and molecular features of these tumours must be taken into account in order to optimise therapeutic approaches.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Medullary/therapy , Medical Oncology/methods , Thyroid Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Carcinoma, Medullary/diagnosis , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Societies, Medical , Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...