ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The 2000-m rowing-ergometer test is the most common measure of rowing performance. Because athletes use different intervention strategies for enhancing performance, investigating the effect of preconditioning strategies on the 2000-m test is of great relevance. This study evaluated the effects of different preconditioning strategies on 2000-m rowing-ergometer performance in trained rowers. METHODS: A search of electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science) identified 27 effects of different preconditioning strategies from 17 studies. Outcomes were calculated as percentage differences between control and experimental interventions, and data were presented as mean ± 90% confidence interval. Performance data were converted to the same metrics, that is, mean power. Meta-regression analyses were conducted to assess whether performance level or caffeine dose could affect the percentage change. RESULTS: The overall beneficial effect on 2000-m mean power was 2.1% (90% confidence limit [CL] ±0.6%). Training status affected the percentage change with interventions, with a -1.1% (90% CL ±1.2%) possible small decrease for 1.0-W·kg-1 increment in performance baseline. Caffeine consumption most likely improves performance, with superior effect in higher doses (≥6 mg·kg-1). Sodium bicarbonate and beta-alanine consumption resulted in likely (2.6% [90% CL ±1.5%]) and very likely (1.4% [90% CL ±1.2%]) performance improvements, respectively. However, some preconditioning strategies such as heat acclimation, rehydration, and creatine resulted in small to moderate enhancements in 2000-m performance. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation of caffeine and beta-alanine is a popular and effective strategy to improve 2000-m ergometer performance in trained rowers. Additional research is warranted to confirm the benefit of other strategies to 2000-m rowing-ergometer performance.
Subject(s)
Athletic Performance/physiology , Performance-Enhancing Substances/administration & dosage , Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Water Sports/physiology , Athletes , Caffeine/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Ergometry , Humans , Sodium Bicarbonate/administration & dosage , beta-Alanine/administration & dosageABSTRACT
A relação entre desempenhos em diferentes distâncias com seus respectivos tempos fornece um válido, barato e prático índice de avaliação da capacidade aeróbia para natação. Este índice, conhecido como Velocidade Crítica, tem recebido muita atenção por pesquisadores, pois possibilita a substituição de outros indicadores de capacidade aeróbia que geralmente são caros ou demandam demasiado tempo do período de treinamento. No entanto, ainda não foi realizada uma compilação de estudos tratando da Velocidade Crítica com outros índices de capacidade aeróbia na natação. Assim, o objetivo desta revisão foi comparar a relação da Velocidade Crítica com outros índices de capacidade aeróbia comumente utilizados na natação como: Teste de 30 Minutos, Máximo Estado Estável de Lactato, Limiar Anaeróbio e Velocidade Aeróbia Máxima. Foi realizada uma busca bibliográfica nas bases de dados PubMed e SciELO, utilizando-se as seguintes palavras-chave: "Critical swimming speed", "critical swimming velocity" e "velocidade crítica and natação". Ao fim do processo de seleção foram incluídos 21 artigos para esta revisão. Foi observado que a relação da Velocidade Crítica com o Limiar Anaeróbio e o Teste de 30 Minutos é dependente da idade dos nadadores, requerendo cautela quando comparados. Também foi observado que a Velocidade Crítica superestima a intensidade do Máximo Estado Estável de Lactato e do Limiar Anaeróbio em nadadores adultos, indicando delimitar os domínios do exercício pesado e severo na natação. Contudo, a Velocidade Crítica pode ser influenciada pelas distâncias preditivas utilizadas para sua determinação, e assim, devem ser cuidadosamente selecionadas. Por fim, a Velocidade Crítica apresenta boa correlação com os principais índices aeróbios representando ser um bom parâmetro para avaliação da capacidade aeróbia em nadadores....(AU)
The relationship between distance covered and the time needed to cover it at maximal speed provide a valid, cheap and practice index to evaluate aerobic capacity in swimming. This index, known as Critical Swimming Speed, has received much attention for researchers, because it could replace other aerobic capacity indexes that usually are more expensive and demand more time of training. However, there is no compilation of studies involving Critical Swimming Speed and other aerobic capacity index on the literature. Hence, the purpose of this literature review was comparing the relationship between Critical Swimming Speed with others aerobic capacity indexes generally used in swimming as: 30-min Test, Maximal Lactate Steady State, Anaerobic Threshold and Maximal Aerobic Speed. The articles were surveyed on the scientific bases PubMed and SciELO using the following keywords: "Critical swimming speed", "critical swimming velocity" and "velocidade crítica and natação" (on Portuguese). At the end of the search process, 21 articles were included in the revision. It was observed that the relationship between Critical Swimming Speed with Anaerobic Threshold and 30-min Test is affected by the age of the swimmers, demanding caution when comparing these indexes. It was also observed that the Critical Swimming Speed overestimates the Maximal Lactate Steady State and Anaerobic Threshold in adult swimmers, which indicates a boundary between the heavy and severe intensity domains during swimming exercises. However, the predictive distances used for the Critical Swimming Speed determination may influence on its final value and, thus, they should be carefully selected. Lastly, Critical Swimming Speed shows a good correlation with major aerobic indexes and represents a good aerobic capacity parameter to evaluate swimmers....(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Athletes , Athletic Performance , Lactic Acid , Oxygen Consumption , Physical Education and Training , Swimming , Speed MetersABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to determine the effects of ischemic preconditioning on performance in three successive 50-m swimming trials and to measure stroke rate, stroke length and blood lactate accumulation. DESIGN: Counterbalanced, repeated-measures cross-over study. METHODS: On two separate days, eleven competitive male swimmers (20±3 years, 182±5cm, 77±5kg) performed three successive 50-m trials in a 50-m swimming pool, preceded by intermittent bilateral cuff inflation (4× 5-min of blood flow restriction+5-min of cuff deflation) at either 220 for thighs and 180mmHg for arms (ischemic preconditioning) or 20mmHg for both limbs (control-treatment). The 50-m trials were conducted 1-, 2-, and 8-h after the procedure. RESULTS: While no ergogenic effect of ischemic preconditioning was observed for 1-h (0.4%, 95% confidence limits of ±0.6%, p=0.215), there were clear beneficial effects of ischemic preconditioning on 2- and 8-h (1.0% and 1.2%, respectively; 95% confidence limits of ±0.6% in both cases, p≤0.002). Furthermore, ischemic preconditioning increased blood lactate accumulation in 2-(p<0.001) and 8-h (p=0.010) and stroke rate for 2- and 8-h in specific 10-m segments (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a time-dependent effect of ischemic preconditioning on 50-m swimming performance for competitive athletes, with the time window of the beneficial effect starting after about 2-h and lasting for at least 8-h after ischemic preconditioning. This change in performance was accompanied by an increase in blood lactate accumulation and faster strokes in front crawl.
Subject(s)
Athletic Performance/psychology , Ischemic Preconditioning/methods , Physical Exertion/physiology , Swimming/physiology , Adolescent , Cross-Over Studies , Humans , Lactic Acid/blood , Male , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
Although the amount of evidence demonstrating the beneficial effects of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) on exercise performance is increasing, conclusions about its efficacy cannot yet be drawn. Therefore, the purposes of this review were to determine the effect of IPC on exercise performance and identify the effects of different IPC procedures, exercise types, and subject characteristics on exercise performance. The analysis comprised 19 relevant studies from 2000 to 2015, 15 of which were included in the meta-analyses. Effect sizes (ES) were calculated as the standardized mean difference. Overall, IPC had a small beneficial effect on exercise performance (ES = 0.43; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 0.51). The largest ES were found for aerobic (ES = 0.51; 90% CI, 0.35 to 0.67) and anaerobic (ES = 0.23; 90% CI, -0.12 to 0.58) exercise. In contrast, an unclear effect was observed in power and sprint performance (ES = 0.16; 90% CI, -0.20 to 0.52). In conclusion, IPC can effectively enhance aerobic and anaerobic exercise performance.
