Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Dent. press endod ; 10(2): 60-66, maio-ago.2020. Tab, Ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1344589

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a resistência à fadiga cíclica e torcional dos sistemas reciprocantes WFile 25.07 (WF, TDKaFile, Cidade do México, México) e X1 Blue File 25.06 (X1 BF, MK Life, Porto Alegre, Bra- sil) à temperatura corporal. Material e Métodos: Foram utilizados 40 instrumentos reciprocantes WFile 25.07 (WF 25.07) e X1 BF 25.06 (n=20, cada grupo). O teste de fadiga cíclica foi realizada à temperatura corporal (36±1°C). Os instrumentos foram ativados com movimento reciprocante em um canal artificial de aço inoxidável com ângulo de 60o e 5mm de raio de curvatura (n=10). O teste torcional avaliou o torque e o ângulo de rotação necessários para a fratura dos instrumentos (n=10) nos 3mm iniciais da parte ativa do instrumento, de acordo com a norma ISO 3630-1. Os fragmentos fraturados foram avaliados em microscopia eletrônica de varredura (MEV). Os dados obtidos foram submetidos aos testes estatísticos de Kolmogorov-Smirnov e t de Student, sendo utilizado o nível de significância de 5%. Resultado: O X1BF25.06 apresentou maior tempo e número de ciclos para a fratura do que o WF 25.07 (p<0,05). O teste de torção demonstrou que o WF 25.07 apresentou maior torque do que o X1 BF 25.06 (p<0,05). Em relação ao ângulo de rotação, o X1 BF 25.06 apresentou maiores valores do que o WF 25.07 (p<0,05). Conclusão: O X1 BF apresentou maior resistência à fadiga cíclica e maior ângulo para a fratura do que o WF 25.07. Entretanto, o WF 25.07 apresentou maior torque para a fratura do que o X1 BF 25.06 (AU).


Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cyclic and torsional fatigue resistance of reciprocating single-file systems W File 25.07 (WF, TDKaFile, Mexico City, Mexico) and X1 Blue File 25.06 (X1 BF, MK Life, Porto Alegre, Brazil) at body temperature. Materials and Methods: Forty reciprocating instruments of the W File 25.07 (WF 25.07) and X1 BF 25.06 (n=20) were used. Cyclic fatigue tests were performed at body temperature (36° ± 1°C). The instruments were reciprocated until fracture occurred in an artificial stainless steel canal with a 600 angle and a 5-mm radius of curvature (n=10). The torsional test evaluated the torque and angle of rotation at failure of new instruments (n=10) in the portion 3 mm from the tip according to ISO 3630-1. The fractured surface of each fragment was observed by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests, and the level of significance was set at 5%. Results: X1 BF 25.06 had significantly higher time and NCF to failure than WF 25.07 (P<0.05). The torsional test showed that WF 25.07 had significantly greater torsional strength (p<0.05). In relation to angular rotation, the X1 BF 25.06 showed higher angular rotation values to failure than WF 25.07 (p<0.05). Conclusion: The X1 BF 25.06 had the highest cyclic fatigue resistance and highest angular rotation values to fracture in comparison with WF 25.07. However, WF 25.07 showed higher torsional resistance to fracture than X1 BF 25.06 (AU).


Subject(s)
Dental Instruments , Endodontics , Torsion, Mechanical , Titanium , Fatigue , Nickel
2.
J Endod ; 46(5): 682-687, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32139265

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the volume of irrigant extrusion by different final agitation techniques in experimental models of immature teeth. METHODS: Fifteen single roots of mandibular premolars with a length of 14 mm and an open apex were used to form 6 groups according to the final agitation technique: group 1, positive pressure and no agitation; group 2, ultrasonic agitation with Irrisonic (Helse Dental Technology, Santa Rosa de Viterbo, Brazil); group 3, ultrasonic agitation with Irrisonic Power (Helse Dental Technology); group 4, mechanical agitation with Easy Clean (Easy Dental Equipment, Belo Horizonte, Brazil); group 5, mechanical agitation with XP-endo Finisher (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland); and group 6, sonic agitation with Eddy (VDW, Munich, Germany). A prototype was made from an Eppendorf plastic tube filled with agar to fix the tooth and to collect the extruded irrigant. Ioditrast 76 (Justesa Imagen Mexicana, Tlalpan, Mexico) contrast solution was used to simulate the irrigant. The volume of irrigant extruded in cubic millimeters was calculated by micro-computed tomographic imaging. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: The values for the volume of irrigant extruded were as follows: 0.67 (group 5), 0.76 (group 1), 2.28 (group 2), 3.14 (group 3), 3.15 (group 4), and 17.19 (group 6). There was a statistically significant difference (P < .05) when the values of group 6 were compared with those of the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: All techniques caused irrigant extrusion. The higher extrusion values occurred when sonic agitation was performed with the Eddy instrument.


Subject(s)
Dental Pulp Cavity , Root Canal Preparation , Bicuspid , Brazil , Mexico , Root Canal Irrigants , Therapeutic Irrigation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...