[Impacto de la covid-19 en el estrés, la ansiedad y la depresión en personas con Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo: una revisión sistemática.] / Impact of covid-19 on stress, anxiety and depression in people with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The population's mental health has been compromised by a global pandemic, especially in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. The objective of this study was to evaluate the levels of stress, anxiety and depression in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder during COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out following the PRISMA format in the electronic databases Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Dialnet and Medline between the months of January and May 2023. Method quality was assessed based on the critical evaluation tools for studies of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). RESULTS: A total of twelve studies were included in this review. The mental health of the population has been compromised by the COVID-19 pandemic, with patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder being especially affected. Although there was a wide variability of results, it was observed that the level of stress and anxiety increased during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: The mental health of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, especially washing machine patients, is compromised in times of pandemic, presenting medium-high levels of stress, anxiety and depression.

OBJETIVO: La salud mental de la población se ha visto comprometida ante una situación de pandemia mundial, especialmente en pacientes con Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo (TOC). El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar los niveles de estrés, ansiedad y depresión en pacientes con TOC durante la pandemia de la COVID-19. METODOS: Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo el formato PRISMA en las bases de datos electrónicas Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Dialnet y Medline entre los meses de enero y mayo de 2023. A partir de las herramientas de evaluación crítica para estudios del Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) se evaluó la calidad metodológica. RESULTADOS: Un total de doce estudios fueron incluidos en esta revisión. La salud mental de la población se vio comprometida ante la pandemia de la COVID-19, siendo especialmente afectados los pacientes con TOC. Aunque existió una amplia variabilidad de resultados, se observó que el nivel de estrés y ansiedad aumentó durante la pandemia. CONCLUSIONES: La salud mental de los pacientes con TOC, especialmente los que tienen TOC de limpieza, se ve comprometida en tiempos de pandemia, presentando niveles medios-altos de estrés, ansiedad y depresión.

Impacto de la COVID-19 en el estrés, la ansiedad y la depresión en personas con Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo: una revisión sistemática / mpact of COVID-19 on stress, anxiety and depression in people with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: a systematic review

Fundamentos: La salud mental de la población se ha visto comprometida ante una situación de pandemia mundial, especialmente en pacientes con Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo (TOC). El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar los niveles de estrés, ansiedady depresión en pacientes con TOC durante la pandemia de la COVID-19. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo el formato PRISMA en las bases de datos electrónicasPubmed, Scopus,Web of Science, Dialnet yMedline entre los meses de enero y mayo de 2023. A partir de las herramientas de evaluación crítica paraestudios del Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) se evaluó la calidad metodológica. Resultados: Un total de doce estudios fueron incluidos en esta revisión. La salud mental de la población se vio comprometidaante la pandemia de la COVID-19, siendo especialmente afectados los pacientes con TOC. Aunque existió una amplia variabilidad deresultados, se observó que el nivel de estrés y ansiedad aumentó durante la pandemia. Conclusiones: La salud mental de los pacientes con TOC, especialmente los que tienen TOC de limpieza, se ve comprometidaen tiempos de pandemia, presentando niveles medios-altos de estrés, ansiedad y depresión.(AU)

Bacground: The population’s mental health has been compromised by a global pandemic, especially in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. The objective of this study was to evaluate the levels of stress, anxiety and depression in patients withobsessive-compulsive disorder during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A systematic review was carried out following the PRISMA format in the electronic databases Pubmed, Scopus, Web ofScience, Dialnet and Medline between the months of January and May 2023. Method quality was assessed based on the critical evaluationtools for studies of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Results: A total of twelve studies were included in this review. The mental health of the population has been compromised by theCOVID-19 pandemic, with patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder being especially affected. Although there was a wide variabilityof results, it was observed that the level of stress and anxiety increased during the pandemic. Conclusions: The mental health of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, especiallywashing machine patients, is com-promised in times of pandemic, presenting medium-high levels of stress, anxiety and depression.(AU)

Compliance with the clinical laboratory quality protocol in public primary healthcare centres.

The clinical and economic relevance of the clinical laboratories procedures in Andalusia (Spain) have led the Regional Department of Health to focus attention on their improvement. A unified laboratory protocol was implemented that consisted of the unification of criteria in the handling and processing of samples, and report of results. The objective of this study is to describe the degree of compliance with the clinical laboratory protocol in the preanalytical phase, which includes the analytical request and up to the delivery in the laboratory, as well as the influencing factors. Cross-sectional descriptive study with a sample of 214 healthcare professionals involved in the preanalytical phase of laboratory procedures in primary care. A self-reported questionnaire with 11 items was used for data collection. Each item was assessed separately with a scale from 0 to 10. A 5 points score was considered as the cutoff point. Descriptive analysis was conducted and Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine differences between subgroups. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was considered. The best rated item was verifying the correspondence between the request form and identity of the patient. Each item scored from 3 to 10, and the mean for each item ranged from 6.40 (standard deviation = 3.06) to 8.57 (standard deviation = 2.00). Values above or equal to 8 were obtained, for 63.6% of them. Statistically significant differences between accredited and nonaccredited centres were found. Differences were not noteworthy regarding centres with a teaching activity or those without it. All the items were measured separately. The compliance with the protocol was adequate among primary healthcare professionals, who have a strategic position in the sample collection and its transport during the preanalytical phase. Being so, standardisation should be a priority to reduce errors and improve clinical safety and results.

Adverse events reported after administration of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines among hospital workers: a cross-sectional survey-based study in a Spanish hospital.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic in March 2020. The first vaccine became available in December, with practically no post-marketing data. METHODS: An analytical cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted in a third-level hospital in Spain between March and April 2021 to describe the difference in adverse events with the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines. The participants were hospital workers who completed a survey voluntarily at least 14 days after the last vaccine. The STROBE checklist was followed. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred and forty-nine respondents completed the survey; 48% (599) received mRNA-1273 and 52% (650) BNT162b2. Fourteen thousand four hundred and two adverse reactions were recorded, 6896 local (3939 with mRNA-1273 and 2957 with BNT162b2 (6.6 vs 4.4 reactions per patient)) and 7506 systemic (4460 with mRNA-1273 and 3046 with BNT162b2 (7.4 vs 4.7 per patient)). Local reactions were more frequent after the first dose, while systemic reactions were higher after the second, for both vaccines and in a higher percentage with mRNA-1273 compared to BNT162b2 (p-value<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Licensed mRNA vaccines were highly safe when administered under post-marketing conditions among working-age adults. The main adverse events were mild, although they occurred in most patients, especially after the mRNA-1273 vaccine.

[Applicability of decision aids in emergency departments: an exploratory review]. / Aplicabilidad de las herramientas de ayuda a la toma de decisiones compartidas en los servicios de Urgencias: una revisión exploratoria.

BACKGROUND: Decision aid tools (DAT) have been widely used in chronic diseases, but there are few studies on their usefulness in emergency departments. The objective of this study was to analyse the applicability of DAT in emergency services. METHODS: An exploratory review was conducted. Between January 1, 2012 and August 1, 2019, searches of randomised and controlled clinical trials, systematic reviews and other secondary studies where DAT are used to assist patients of any age in emergency services were conducted. The databases used were: Pubmed, Embase, Web Of Science, Cuiden, Patient Decision Aids Research Group IPDAS Collaboration, Cochrane, Centres for Reviews and Dissemination, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Guidelines International Network. Two reviewers analysed and selected the studies. RESULTS: Twelve studies of moderate-low quality were included. The patients in the intervention group (IG) were more aware of their illness (M=3.6 vs 3 correct answers and M=4.2 vs 3.6), and more involved in the decisions (score in OPTION: 26.6 vs 7 and 18.3 vs 7). The conflict was reduced in the IG regarding those imaging tests in the TBI (traumatic brain injury; M=14.8 vs 19.2). In the IG, admittance to perform effort tests was reduced in low-risk chest pain (58% vs 77%; CI95%=6%-31%, 37% vs 52%; p<0.001). When DAT were used in children with diarrhoea or vomiting, in 80% of the cases the decision was to use oral rehydration against 61% in the control group (CG, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DAT in emergency services improve patient's knowledge about the disease and their participation in care. More studies are needed to develop DAT in emergency services.

OBJETIVO: Las herramientas de ayuda en la toma de decisiones (HATD) han sido muy utilizadas en las enfermedades crónicas, pero existen pocos estudios sobre su utilidad en los servicios de urgencias. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la utilización de las HATD en los servicios de urgencias. METODOS: Se realizó una revisión exploratoria. Se realizaron búsquedas de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados y controlados, revisiones sistemáticas y otros estudios secundar0ios donde se utilizaran las HATD para la asistencia a pacientes de cualquier edad en los servicios de urgencias, entre el 1 de enero de 2012 y el 1 de agosto de 2019. Dos revisores examinaron y seleccionaron los estudios. Se utilizaron las siguientes bases de datos: Pubmed, Embase, Web Of Science, Cuiden, Patient Decision Aids Research Group IPDAS Collaboration, Cochrane, Centres for Reviews and Dissemination, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Guidelines International Network. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron doce estudios, de calidad metodológica moderada-baja. Los pacientes del Grupo de Intervención (GI) tenían mayor conocimiento de la enfermedad (M=3,6 frente a 3 preguntas correctas y M=4,2 frente a 3,6) y más implicación en las decisiones (puntuación en OPTION: 26,6 contra 7 y 18,3 contra 7). El conflicto se redujo en el GI en las decisiones sobre pruebas de imagen en el traumatismo craneoencefálico (TCE) (M=14,8 frente a 19,2). En el GI era menos frecuente el ingreso para realizar una prueba de esfuerzo en casos de dolor torácico de bajo riesgo (58% contra 77%; IC95%=6%-31%, y 37% contra 52%; p<0,001). Cuando se utilizaba una HATD en niños con diarrea o vómitos, en el 80% la decisión era seguir una rehidratación oral frente al 61% en el GC (p=0,001). CONCLUSIONES: Las HATD en los servicios de urgencias mejoran el conocimiento de los pacientes sobre la enfermedad y la participación en los cuidados. Se necesitan más estudios para desarrollar HATD en los servicios de urgencias.

Aplicabilidad de las herramientas de ayuda a la toma de decisiones compartidas en los servicios de Urgencias: una revisión exploratoria / Applicability of decision aids in emergency departments: an exploratory review

OBJETIVO: Las herramientas de ayuda en la toma de decisiones (HATD) han sido muy utilizadas en las enfermedades crónicas, pero existen pocos estudios sobre su utilidad en los servicios de urgencias. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la utilización de las HATD en los servicios de urgencias. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una revisión exploratoria. Se realizaron búsquedas de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados y controlados, revisiones sistemáticas y otros estudios secundarios donde se utilizaran las HATD para la asistencia a pacientes de cualquier edad en los servicios de urgencias, entre el 1 de enero de 2012 y el 1 de agosto de 2019. Dos revisores examinaron y seleccionaron los estudios. Se utilizaron las siguientes bases de datos: Pubmed, Embase, Web Of Science, Cuiden, Patient Decision Aids Research Group IPDAS Collaboration, Cochrane, Centres for Reviews and Dissemination, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Guidelines International Network. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron doce estudios, de calidad metodológica moderada-baja. Los pacientes del Grupo de Intervención (GI) tenían mayor conocimiento de la enfermedad (M=3,6 frente a 3 preguntas correctas y M=4,2 frente a 3,6) y más implicación en las decisiones (puntuación en OPTION: 26,6 contra 7 y 18,3 contra 7). El conflicto se redujo en el GI en las decisiones sobre pruebas de imagen en el traumatismo craneoencefálico (TCE) (M=14,8 frente a 19,2). En el GI era menos frecuente el ingreso para realizar una prueba de esfuerzo en casos de dolor torácico de bajo riesgo (58% contra 77%; IC95%=6%-31%, y 37% contra 52%; p<0,001). Cuando se utilizaba una HATD en niños con diarrea o vómitos, en el 80% la decisión era seguir una rehidratación oral frente al 61% en el GC (p=0,001). CONCLUSIONES: Las HATD en los servicios de urgencias mejoran el conocimiento de los pacientes sobre la enfermedad y la participación en los cuidados. Se necesitan más estudios para desarrollar HATD en los servicios de urgencias

BACKGROUND: Decision aid tools (DAT) have been widely used in chronic diseases, but there are few studies on their usefulness in emergency departments. The objective of this study was to analyse the applicability of DAT in emergency services. METHODS: An exploratory review was conducted. Between January 1, 2012 and August 1, 2019, searches of randomised and controlled clinical trials, systematic reviews and other secondary studies where DAT are used to assist patients of any age in emergency services were conducted. The databases used were: Pubmed, Embase, Web Of Science, Cuiden, Patient Decision Aids Research Group IPDAS Collaboration, Cochrane, Centres for Reviews and Dissemination, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Guidelines International Network. Two reviewers analysed and selected the studies. RESULTS: Twelve studies of moderate-low quality were included. The patients in the intervention group (IG) were more aware of their illness (M=3.6 vs 3 correct answers and M=4.2 vs 3.6), and more involved in the decisions (score in OPTION: 26.6 vs 7 and 18.3 vs 7). The conflict was reduced in the IG regarding those imaging tests in the TBI (traumatic brain injury; M=14.8 vs 19.2). In the IG, admittance to perform effort tests was reduced in low-risk chest pain (58% vs 77%; CI95%=6%-31%, 37% vs 52%; p<0.001). When DAT were used in children with diarrhoea or vomiting, in 80% of the cases the decision was to use oral rehydration against 61% in the control group (CG, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DAT in emergency services improve patient's knowledge about the disease and their participation in care. More studies are needed to develop DAT in emergency services