Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 42
Filter
1.
Cancers (Basel) ; 12(11)2020 Nov 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33238387

ABSTRACT

Annual breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plus mammography is the standard of care for screening women with inherited BRCA1/2 mutations. However, long-term breast cancer-related mortality with screening is unknown. Between 1997 and June 2011, 489 previously unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers aged 25 to 65 years were screened with annual MRI plus mammography on our study. Thereafter, participants were eligible to continue MRI screening through the high-risk Ontario Breast Screening Program. In 2019, our data were linked to the Ontario Cancer Registry of Cancer Care Ontario to identify all incident cancers, vital status and causes of death. Observed breast cancer mortality was compared to expected mortality for age-matched women in the general population. There were 91 women diagnosed with breast cancer (72 invasive and 19 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)) with median follow-up 7.4 (range: 0.1 to 19.2) years. Four deaths from breast cancer were observed, compared to 2.0 deaths expected (standardized mortality ratio (SMR) 2.0, p = 0.14). For the 489 women in the study, the probability of not dying of breast cancer at 20 years from the date of the first MRI was 98.2%. Annual screening with MRI plus mammography is a reasonable option for women who decline or defer risk-reducing mastectomy.

2.
Radiology ; 285(1): 36-43, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28586291

ABSTRACT

Purpose To evaluate the value of mammography in detecting breast cancer in high-risk women undergoing screening breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Materials and Methods An ethics-approved, retrospective review of prospective databases was performed to identify outcomes of 3934 screening studies (1977 screening MR imaging examinations and 1957 screening mammograms) performed between January 2012 and July 2014 in 1249 high-risk women. Performance measures including recall and cancer detection rates, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were calculated for both mammography and MR imaging. Results A total of 45 cancers (33 invasive and 12 ductal carcinomas in situ) were diagnosed, 43 were seen with MR imaging and 14 with both mammography and MR imaging. Additional tests (further imaging and/or biopsy) were recommended in 461 screening MR imaging studies (recall rate, 23.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.5%, 25.2%), and mammography recalled 217 (recall rate, 11.1%; 95% CI: 9.7%, 12.6%). The cancer detection rate for MR imaging was 21.8 cancers per 1000 examinations (95% CI: 15.78, 29.19) and that for mammography was 7.2 cancers per 1000 examinations (95% CI: 3.92, 11.97; P < .001). Sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging were 96% and 78% respectively, and those of mammography were 31% and 89%, respectively (P < .001). Positive predictive value for MR imaging recalls was 9.3% (95% CI: 6.83%, 12.36%) and that for mammography recalls was 6.5% (95% CI: 3.57%, 10.59%). Conclusion Contemporaneous screening mammography did not have added value in detection of breast cancer for women who undergo screening MR imaging. Routine use of screening mammography in women undergoing screening breast MR imaging warrants reconsideration. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Early Detection of Cancer , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Mammography , Mass Screening , Adult , Aged , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Mammography/methods , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young Adult
3.
J Ultrasound Med ; 36(9): 1883-1894, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28556296

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to correlate various features of breast cancers on ultrasound to their histological grade and immunohistochemical biomarkers. METHODS: Seventy-three patients with 77 invasive breast cancers, diagnosed between August 2011 and December 2014, were included in this prospective analysis. Margin, posterior features, shape, and vascularity were determined from ultrasound and classified according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon. Histological grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status (positive [+] or negative [-]) were determined from surgical pathology reports. The cancers were categorized into low grade (grades 1 or 2) and high grade (grade 3). Correlation of ultrasound features of the cancers to their histological grade and receptor status was performed. RESULTS: There were 47 low-grade and 29 high-grade cancers. There was a significant difference in margin and posterior features between the low and high grade, ER + and ER-, and PR + and PR- (all P < .05), but not between HER2 + and HER2- cancers (both P > .05). There was no significant difference in shape and vascularity among the different subtypes (all P > .05). Spiculated margin was significantly associated with low-grade, ER+, PR + status; angular margin with high grade; microlobulated margin with ER- status; shadowing with PR + status; and enhancement with high grade, ER- status (all P < .05, all odds ratios ≥ 3.94). CONCLUSIONS: There was significant association of margin and posterior features of breast cancers with their histological grade and receptor status.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/blood , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Receptor, ErbB-2/blood , Receptors, Estrogen/blood , Receptors, Progesterone/blood , Ultrasonography, Mammary/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Breast/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Prospective Studies
4.
J Surg Oncol ; 115(3): 231-237, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28105662

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Local recurrence after breast conserving surgery is reported in 5-10% of cases. This study aims to determine if preoperative MRI is associated with reduced IBTR rates in the longer term and evaluate IBTR rates of a high risk (TN and Her-2 positive) subgroup in those receiving MRI or not. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2005, patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing BCS and radiation were identified. Primary endpoint was IBTR rate. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 470 cases: 27% underwent MRI and 73% did not. Median follow-up was 97 months. Overall 10-year IBTR rate was 3.6%. There was no significant difference in IBTR rate at 10 years between those receiving MRI or not (1.6% vs. 4.2% (P = 0.37). The TN and Her-2 positive combined subgroup had a higher IBTR rate than all others (9.8% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.001). In the group without MRI, the IBTR rate of the high risk group was 11.8% compared to 1.8% in the remainder (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: With 10-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in IBTR rate whether preoperative MRI is performed versus not. The high risk population showed an increased IBTR rate, this was more marked in those who did not receive MRI.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Cohort Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Mastectomy, Segmental , Middle Aged
5.
Cancer Med ; 5(6): 1031-6, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26992816

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of clinically and mammographically occult disease using breast MRI in a cohort of cancer patients undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) and the utmost indication of axillary assessment (sentinel node biopsy (SLNB)) for this side. A retrospective review of patients with unilateral invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from institutional MRI registry data (2004-2010) was conducted. Characteristics of patients undergoing CPM with breast MRI obtained less than 6 month before surgery were evaluated. A total of 2322 consecutive patients diagnosed with DCIS or stage I to III infiltrating breast cancer underwent preoperative breast MRI. Of these, 1376 patients (59.2%) had contralateral clinical breast exam and mammography without abnormalities; and 116 patients (4.9%) underwent CPM (28 excluded patients had breast MRI more than 6 months before CPM). The mean age of the 88 patients was 49 years (range 28-76 years). Two (2.3%) DCIS identified on surgical pathology specimen were not depicted by MRI and the 5 mm T1N0 invasive cancer (1.1%) was identified on MRI. Preoperative MRI showed 95% accuracy to demonstrate absence of occult disease with negative predicted value (NPV) of 98% (95% CI: 91.64-99.64%). Occult disease was present in 3.4% of CPM. MRI accurately identified the case of invasive cancer in this cohort. The high negative predictive value suggests that MRI can be used to select patients without consideration of SLNB for the contralateral side.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Prophylactic Mastectomy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , BRCA1 Protein , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Mammography , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Young Adult
6.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 108(7)2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26933010

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Female survivors treated with thoracic radiation therapy (RT) for childhood cancer experience increased risks of breast cancer (BC). There are currently no data quantifying the potential mortality gains of early BC screening among such survivors. METHODS: A mathematical model of BC development was used to evaluate the marginal benefit of early-initiated screening of female survivors of adolescent Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) starting at age 25 years on BC mortality compared with screening initiated at age 40 years. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the estimates over a plausible range of conditions. RESULTS: For survivors treated at age 15 years, the absolute risk of BC mortality by age 75 years was predicted to decrease from 16.65% with no early screening to 16.28% (annual mammography), 15.40% (annual MRI), 15.38% (same-day annual mammography and MRI), and 15.37% (alternating mammography and MRI every six months). Approximately 80 patients would need to be invited to MRI-based screening to prevent one BC death. In sensitivity analyses, the number needed to invite to MRI-based screening to prevent one BC death ranged from 71 to 333. Combinations of MRI plus mammography were predicted to produce 99.52 false positives per 1000 screenings done between age 25 to 39 years. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are the first to indicate that early MRI-based screening should reduce BC mortality among women treated with RT for adolescent HL. The magnitude of this benefit is superior to that described for other accepted screening indications although MRI can produce a substantial rate of false-positive results.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Hodgkin Disease/radiotherapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Mammography , Population Surveillance/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Child , Early Detection of Cancer , False Positive Reactions , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Models, Theoretical , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
8.
Acad Radiol ; 23(2): 168-75, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26546383

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended for the screening of women with a history of chest radiotherapy and consequent increased breast cancer risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of prior chest radiotherapy on breast tissue background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) at screening breast MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A departmental database was reviewed to identify asymptomatic women with either a history of chest radiotherapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma or age-matched controls who underwent screening breast MRI between 2009 and 2013. MRI studies were analyzed on an automated breast MRI viewing platform to calculate breast BPE and breast density. RESULTS: A total of 61 cases (mean age 41.6 ± 6.75 years) and 61 controls (mean age 40.8 ± 6.99 years) were included. The age of patients at the time of chest radiotherapy was 22.6 ± 8.17 years. Screening MRI was performed 19.0 ± 7.43 years after chest radiotherapy. BPE was significantly higher in patients who received chest radiotherapy (50% vs. 37%, P <0.01). A weak to moderate positive correlation (r > 0.3; P < 0.03) was found between BPE and number of years post radiotherapy. There was a trend toward significant difference between the two groups in the correlation of BPE and age (P = 0.05). Breast density was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: BPE is significantly greater in women who receive chest radiotherapy for childhood Hodgkin's lymphoma, and unexpectedly, it positively correlates with the number of years passed after radiation therapy. Long-term biological effects of radiation therapy on breast parenchyma need further research.


Subject(s)
Breast/diagnostic imaging , Hodgkin Disease/radiotherapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Parenchymal Tissue/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Breast/radiation effects , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Case-Control Studies , Contrast Media , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Middle Aged , Organometallic Compounds , Parenchymal Tissue/radiation effects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survivors
9.
Acad Radiol ; 22(3): 269-77, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25666048

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To correlate prognostic histologic features and immunohistochemical biomarkers of breast cancer with quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: B-mode ultrasound (US) and SWE were performed before core biopsy on 72 cancers in 68 patients. Mean cancer size was determined from US. Histologic grade, lymph node status, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), histologic type, and immunohistochemical biomarkers (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]) were determined from surgical pathology reports. Correlation between these features and quantitative SWE parameters (mean elasticity [E mean], maximum elasticity [E max], and elasticity ratio [E ratio]) was made. RESULTS: There was significant correlation of mean cancer size with E mean, E max, and E ratio (correlation, 0.492, 0.500, and 0.435, respectively; all P < .001). Lymph node involvement was associated with significantly higher E max (P = .040). LVI was associated with significantly higher E mean, E max, and E ratio (P = .002, .004, and .042, respectively). There was no significant correlation of histologic grade with SWE parameters. HER2+ cancers were associated with significantly higher E ratio (P = .030). In multivariate analysis, only mean cancer size was significantly correlated with E mean and E max (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There was significant correlation of cancer size with SWE parameters. There was significant correlation of lymph node status and LVI with SWE, but only on univariate analysis. SWE has the potential to provide prognostic information of breast cancer in a noninvasive manner, but further study is required.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Elasticity Imaging Techniques , Ultrasonography, Mammary , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers/metabolism , Biopsy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results
10.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 203(3): W328-36, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25148191

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to assess the diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses and to determine the most discriminatory parameter. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: B-mode ultrasound and shear wave elastography were performed before core biopsy of 123 masses in 112 women. The diagnostic performance of ultrasound and quantitative shear wave elastography parameters (mean elasticity, maximum elasticity, and elasticity ratio) were compared. The added effect of shear wave elastography on the performance of ultrasound was determined. RESULTS: The mean elasticity, maximum elasticity, and elasticity ratio were 24.8 kPa, 30.3 kPa, and 1.90, respectively, for 79 benign masses and 130.7 kPa, 154.9 kPa, and 11.52, respectively, for 44 malignant masses (p < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value for each parameter was determined to be 42.5 kPa, 46.7 kPa, and 3.56, respectively. The AUC of each shear wave elastography parameter was higher than that of ultrasound (p < 0.001); the AUC value for the elasticity ratio (0.943) was the highest. By adding shear wave elastography parameters to the evaluation of BI-RADS category 4a masses, about 90% of masses could be downgraded to BI-RADS category 3. The numbers of downgraded masses were 40 of 44 (91%) for mean elasticity, 39 of 44 (89%) for maximum elasticity, and 42 of 44 (95%) for elasticity ratio. The numbers of correctly downgraded masses were 39 of 40 (98%) for mean elasticity, 38 of 39 (97%) for maximum elasticity, and 41 of 42 (98%) for elasticity ratio. There was improvement in the diagnostic performance of ultrasound of mass assessment with shear wave elastography parameters added to BI-RADS category 4a masses compared with ultrasound alone. Combined ultrasound and elasticity ratio had the highest improvement, from 35.44% to 87.34% for specificity, from 45.74% to 80.77% for positive predictive value, and from 57.72% to 90.24% for accuracy (p < 0.0001). The AUC of combined ultrasound and elasticity ratio (0.914) was the highest compared with the other combined parameters. CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant difference in the values of the quantitative shear wave elastography parameters of benign and malignant solid breast masses. By adding shear wave elastography parameters to BI-RADS category 4a masses, we found that about 90% of them could be correctly downgraded to BI-RADS category 3, thereby avoiding biopsy. Elasticity ratio (cutoff, 3.56) appeared to be the most discriminatory parameter.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Elasticity Imaging Techniques/methods , Image Enhancement/methods , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Ultrasonography, Mammary/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Breast Neoplasms/physiopathology , Discriminant Analysis , Elastic Modulus , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young Adult
11.
Cancer ; 120(16): 2507-13, 2014 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24888639

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Female survivors of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) who have received chest radiotherapy are at increased risk of breast cancer. Guidelines for early breast cancer screening among these survivors are based on little data regarding clinical outcomes. This study reports outcomes of breast cancer screening with MRI and mammography (MMG) after childhood HL. METHODS: We evaluated the results of breast MRI and MMG screening among 96 female survivors of childhood HL treated with chest radiotherapy. Outcomes measured included imaging sensitivity and specificity, breast cancer characteristics, and incidence of additional imaging and breast biopsy. RESULTS: Median age at first screening was 30 years, and the median number of MRI screening rounds was 3. Ten breast cancers were detected in 9 women at a median age of 39 years (range, 24-43 years). Half were invasive and half were preinvasive. The median size of invasive tumors was 8 mm (range, 3-15 mm), and none had lymph node involvement. Sensitivity and specificity of the screening modalities were as follows: for MRI alone, 80% and 93.5%, respectively; MMG alone, 70% and 95%, respectively; both modalities combined, 100% and 88.6%, respectively. All invasive tumors were detected by MRI. Additional investigations were required in 52 patients, (54%), and 26 patients (27%) required breast biopsy, with 10 patients requiring more than 1 biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Screening including breast MRI with MMG has high sensitivity and specificity in pediatric HL survivors, with breast cancers detected at an early stage, although it is associated with a substantial rate of additional investigations.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Hodgkin Disease/pathology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/diagnosis , Radiation Injuries/diagnosis , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cohort Studies , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Hodgkin Disease/radiotherapy , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Mammography , Neoplasms, Second Primary/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms, Second Primary/pathology , Radiation Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/pathology , Survivors , Young Adult
12.
J Clin Ultrasound ; 41(7): 424-33, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23836049

ABSTRACT

Fat-containing breast lesions constitute a heterogeneous group of predominantly benign tumors and non-neoplastic conditions. The role of imaging is to distinguish leave-me-alone lesions from rarely occurring malignant fat-containing tumors that require histologic analysis. Correlating mammographic findings with appearance at ultrasonography often helps in identifying lesions that do not require further work-up. MRI can be valuable to confirm the presence of fat and characterize lesions indeterminate on conventional imaging. The purpose of this multimodality imaging review is to exemplify the radiologic appearances of common and uncommon fat-containing breast lesions to facilitate accurate diagnosis, avoid unnecessary interventions, and ensure appropriate management.


Subject(s)
Breast Diseases/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Mammography , Ultrasonography, Mammary , Breast Cyst/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Fat Necrosis/diagnosis , Female , Hamartoma/diagnosis , Humans , Neoplasms, Adipose Tissue/diagnosis
13.
Radiology ; 267(3): 692-700, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23418005

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To perform semiautomated quantitative analysis of the background enhancement (BE) in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and to correlate it with mammographic breast density and menstrual cycle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent was waived after the research ethics board approved this study. Results of 177 consecutive preoperative breast magnetic resonance (MR) examinations performed from February to December 2009 were reviewed; 147 female patients (median age, 48 years; range, 26-86 years) were included. Ordinal values of BE and breast density were described by two independent readers by using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon. The BE coefficient (BEC) was calculated thus: (SI2 · 100/SI1) - 100, where SI is signal intensity, SI2 is the SI enhancement measured in the largest anteroposterior dimension in the axial plane 1 minute after the contrast agent injection, and SI1is the SI before contrast agent injection. BEC was used for the quantitative analysis of BE. Menstrual cycle status was based on the last menstrual period. The Wilcoxon rank-sum or Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare quantitative assessment groups. Cohen weighted κ was used to evaluate agreement. RESULTS: Of 147 patients, 68 (46%) were premenopausal and 79 (54%) were postmenopausal. The quantitative BEC was associated with the menstrual status (BEC in premenopausal women, 31.48 ± 20.68 [standard deviation]; BEC in postmenopausal women, 25.65 ± 16.74; P = .02). The percentage of overall BE was higher when the MR imaging was performed in women in the inadequate phase of the cycle (<35 days, not 7-14 days; mean BEC, 35.7) compared with women in the postmenopausal group (P = .001). Premenopausal women had significantly higher BEC when compared with postmenopausal women (P = .03). There was no significant difference in the percentage of BE between breast density groups. CONCLUSION: Premenopausal women with breast cancer, and specifically women in the inadequate phase of the cycle, presented with higher quantitative BE than postmenopausal women. No association was found between BE and breast density.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Image Enhancement/methods , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Menstrual Cycle , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Mammography , Middle Aged , Organometallic Compounds , Pilot Projects , Retrospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric
15.
Cancer ; 119(3): 495-503, 2013 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22952042

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recommendation for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening for women with a prior history of chest radiation is currently based on expert opinion, because existing data are very scant. The objective of this study was to evaluate added cancer yield of screening breast MRI in this population. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 98 women with a prior history of chest radiation therapy who had screening mammography and screening MRI performed at the authors' institution between January 2004 and July 2010. Medical records of these patients and results of 558 screening studies (296 mammograms and 262 MRI) were reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and added cancer yield were calculated. RESULTS: Malignancy was diagnosed in 13 patients, invasive cancer was diagnosed in 10 patients, and ductal carcinomas in situ was diagnosed in 3 patients. The median latency from completion of radiation to detection of the breast cancer was 18 years (range, 8-37 years). Of the 13 cancers, 12 (92%) were detected by MRI, and 9 (69%) by mammography. For mammography, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 69%, 98%, 82%, and 95%, respectively; and, for MRI, these values were 92%, 94%, 71%, and 99%, respectively. In 4 of 98 patients, cancer was diagnosed on MRI only, resulting in an incremental cancer detection rate of 4.1% (95% confidence interval, 1.6%-10%). CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that MRI is a useful adjunct modality for screening high-risk women who have a prior history of chest radiation therapy, resulting in a 4.1% (4 of 98 women) added cancer detection rate. The authors concluded that both MRI and mammography should be used to screen women in this high-risk group.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Carcinoma/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neoplasms, Second Primary/diagnosis , Radiotherapy , Thorax/radiation effects , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma/pathology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Efficiency , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Radiography , Radiotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Sensitivity and Specificity
16.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 20(1): 133-8, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23064777

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: to determine the frequency of malignancy in subsequent breast excisions following core-needle biopsy (CNB) diagnosis of pure flat epithelial atypia (pFEA) and to evaluate the imaging features of the associated tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 8,996 image-guided CNB (2002-2010) identified 115 cases of FEA not associated with other atypia. Patients with history of breast cancer or radiation therapy were excluded. One hundred four cases (women) with pFEA (mean age 51 years, range 29-77 years) were reviewed. Stereotactic CNB was performed in 79 (76%) cases and ultrasound (US)-guided CNB in 25 (24%) cases. In 99 cases 14G needles were used, and 10G vacuum-assisted devices were used in 5 cases. Ninety-four patients had subsequent excision. Ten patients declined excision, and imaging follow-up (mean of 36 months) is available. The upgrade rate of pFEA was defined as the number of patients diagnosed with invasive carcinoma (IC) or carcinoma in situ (CIS) divided by the total number of patients. RESULTS: 10 of 104 (9.6%) patients were diagnosed with cancer: 9 presented as calcifications (89% fine pleomorphic and amorphous) and 1 case as a mammographically occult mass. The size of calcifications was not statistically significant (P=0.358). Five cases had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and five cases had IC (ductal and lobular) presenting as amorphous and pleomorphic calcifications. CONCLUSIONS: The upgrade rate of pFEA in our series was 9.6%. The presence of 4.8% of invasive cancers is substantial and warrants continuing management with surgical excision in all cases.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast/pathology , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Adult , Aged , Biopsy, Needle , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma in Situ/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Lobular/diagnostic imaging , Epithelium/pathology , Female , Humans , Mammography , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Retrospective Studies
17.
Menopause ; 19(4): 420-5, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22258545

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The breast is highly hormonally sensitive especially to the sex steroid hormone estrogen. Both physiological and iatrogenic steroid hormone modifications could affect how the breast tissue may appear in breast imaging techniques. We hypothesized that estrogen deprivation therapy could reduce breast nonspecific enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: This study was a prospective pilot phase II clinical trial. The study was approved by Health Canada and the institutional research ethics board, and participants signed informed consent forms. Sixteen healthy postmenopausal women were enrolled, and 14 completed the study. Baseline breast MRI was done followed 1 month later by administration of a high-dose aromatase inhibitor (letrozole 12.5 mg/day) for 3 successive days before a second breast MRI. Background breast parenchymal enhancement was compared between the pretreatment and posttreatment studies. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction of the average background breast enhancement after treatment with aromatase inhibitors compared with baseline MRI. Of particular interest, specific areas of benign breast enhancement were reduced after aromatase inhibitor treatment. No significant adverse effects were recorded using this relatively high dose of the aromatase inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study provided evidence that aromatase inhibitors could reduce the parenchymal background enhancement of benign breast tissue during MRI and may improve the specificity of the technique.


Subject(s)
Aromatase Inhibitors , Breast/pathology , Image Enhancement/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Postmenopause , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Reference Values
19.
Can Assoc Radiol J ; 63(3): 207-14, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22136966

ABSTRACT

Results of large randomized trials have shown that survival rates after breast conserving surgery are equivalent to those obtained by radical mastectomy. Breast conserving surgery with wide local excision in women with early stage breast cancer who are thought to have a single and resectable tumour as determined by clinical examination and conventional imaging followed by postoperative irradiation is the standard of care in early breast cancer. Mapping of local disease is the key element to guide optimal surgery to obtain tumour-free margins, thereby decreasing risk of local recurrence. The usual preoperative workup of breast malignancy consists of clinical breast examination and mammography with or without ultrasound. However, mammography and ultrasound fail to accurately assess tumour extent in as many as a third of patients eligible for breast conserving therapy. It is well established that magnetic resonance imaging is far superior to mammography (with and without ultrasound) for mapping the local extent of breast cancer. Experts advocate its use despite its high costs, high number of false positive findings, and lack of evidence from randomized prospective trials and, notably, fear of "overtreatment." This article discusses the current role of breast magnetic resonance imaging with its clinical advantages and applications.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Female , Humans , Mammography , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Preoperative Care , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Reoperation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Survival Rate
20.
Radiology ; 262(2): 425-34, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22143924

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability of unenhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques for detecting metastatic axillary lymph nodes in patients with newly diagnosed breast carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Seventy-four consecutive women with invasive breast carcinoma were recruited to undergo preoperative breast MR imaging. Thirteen patients were excluded, two because they were undergoing preoperative chemotherapy and 11 because of the presence of movement or susceptibility artifacts on images. Thus, 61 patients (mean age, 53 years; range, 33-78 years) were included in this study. Axial T1-weighted MR images without fat saturation and diffusion-weighted (DW) MR images were analyzed by two experienced radiologists, who were blinded to the histopathologic findings. Visual and quantitative analyses of unenhanced MR images were performed. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. To assess the intraobserver agreement, a second reading was performed. Statistical analysis was conducted on a patient-by-affected side basis. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88%, 82%, and 85%, respectively, for axial T1-weighted MR imaging and 84%, 77%, and 80% for DW imaging. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were significantly lower in the malignant group (P<.05 for all four readings), with the average of the four readings ranging from 0.333×10(-3) mm2/sec to 2.843×10(-3) mm2/sec. The mean Lin coefficient comparing the mean ADC reading for each observer was 0.959 (95% confidence interval: 0.935, 0.975), suggesting very high interobserver agreement between the two observers in terms of reproducibility of ADCs. The Bland-Altman plot showed good inter- and intraobserver agreement. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced MR imaging techniques showed high accuracy in the preoperative evaluation of axillary status in patients with invasive breast cancer. Results indicate reliable and reproducible assessment with DW imaging, but it is unlikely to be useful in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma/pathology , Carcinoma/secondary , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Adult , Aged , Axilla/pathology , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...