ABSTRACT
AIM: Cisplatin doublets are standard 1st line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), without accurate predictor for response and survival, but important toxicity. Our aims were to identify predictive (for response) and prognostic (for survival) biological signatures in patients with NSCLC using messenger RNAs (mRNA) and miRNA expression. METHODS: Patients with pathologically proven untreated NSCLC, receiving 1st line cisplatin-vinorelbine and with an assessable lesion were eligible. A bronchial biopsy was lysed into Tripure Isolation Reagent on ice, snap frozen, and stored at -80°C. mRNA expression was analyzed using microarrays Agilent Technologies. miRNA expression was assessed using TaqMan Low Density Arrays (756 human miR panel, Applied Biosystems). Validation was performed by RT-PCR on the selected genes. Survival was measured from the registration date and response assessed by WHO criteria. RESULTS: Biopsies for transcriptomic analyses were obtained from 60 consecutive patients. No statistically significant differences were observed according to the main clinical characteristics, response rate (43 vs. 41%) or survival (median 25 vs. 29 months) between derivation and validation sets. In the derivation set (n = 38 patients), two mRNA and one miRNA predictive signatures for response were obtained. One mRNA and one miRNA prognostic signatures were derived from the first set, allowing an adequate distinction of patients with good and poor overall and progression-free survivals. None of these signatures could be validated in the validation set (n = 22 patients). CONCLUSION: In this prospective study with advanced NSCLC treated with cisplatin-vinorelbine, we were able to derive with high throughput techniques predictive and prognostic signatures based on transcriptomic analyses. However, these results could not be reproduced in an independent validation set. The role of miRNA and mRNA as predictive or prognostic factors remains a research topic and the use of high throughput technology in that context questionable. The ClinicalTrials.gov study identifier is NCT00864266 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of c-erbB-3 has seldom been assessed in patients with non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three NSCLC patients treated by erlotinib for c-erbB-3 and EGFR expression were investigated by immunohistochemistry analysis. RESULTS: Two partial responses, one minor response, two stable diseases and twenty progressive diseases were observed at the first evaluation. Seventeen patients died before evaluation. Median EGFR expression was 70% of the cancer cells. Forty-two percent of the tumours co-expressed c-erbB-3 and EGFR without any difference according to histology or disease stage. There was no correlation between c-erbB-3 and EGFR expression. Median survival time was 2.6 months and the six months survival rate was 21%. There was no detectable impact of EGFR (p=0.94) or c-erbB-3 (p=0.93) expression on survival. CONCLUSION: In this small particular cohort of NSCLC patients receiving salvage therapy with erlotinib, there was no correlation between c-erbB-3 expression and clinical parameters, nor between cerbB-3/EGFR expression and outcome.
