Characteristics of mucocutaneous vascular malformations drawn from a decade of a multidisciplinary committee experience.

Vascular malformations (VM) are congenital, benign, and relatively frequent lesions. Scant data have been published about the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of VM from a dermatologist's perspective. The substantial differences between subtypes, broad range of specialists consulted and confusing nomenclature used over previous years may hamper a correct diagnosis. The main objective of this study is to describe VM epidemiology. As a secondary endpoint we evaluate clinical characteristics, clinical-radiological correlation and treatment approaches. We carried out an observational, descriptive, retrospective study. Cases presented to the multidisciplinary committee of our hospital from 2009 to 2019 were retrieved. Electronic medical records, monthly committee reports and the iconographic archive were reviewed and statistically analyzed. Overall, venous malformations (VeM) are the most frequent VM, followed by capillary malformations (CM), arterioVeM and lymphatic malformations (LM). Considering only patients under 16, CMs are the most frequent ones. Capillary and LMs are larger than venous or arteriovenous. While CMs are usually asymptomatic, symptomatic cases are threefold more frequent in the other subtypes. Decisions on active or conservative management depend on VM size but not location or patient age. CMs are mainly treated with laser therapy; venous with sclerotherapy or surgery; arteriovenous with surgery and lymphatic with surgery or sirolimus. Dermatologists play an important role in VM diagnosis and management. Our 10-year multidisciplinary experience should contribute to the literature and represent a practical resource for clinicians and researchers.

Late evaluation of upper limb arterial flow in patients after long radial (PiCCO™) catheter placement.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to assess blood flow in the upper limb arteries after prolonged catheterization with long radial artery catheters (LRC) which reach the subclavian artery compared to catheterization with standard short radial artery catheters (SRC) and a group of upper limb flow without any catheter placement (NOCATH), with both SRC and NOCATH as control groups. METHODS: Prospective observational study with 20 patients admitted to ICU (40 upper limbs) with LRC and/or SRC inserted >48 h for hemodynamic monitoring. More than 45 days after catheter withdrawal, patients underwent a Doppler ultrasound study of both upper limbs. Arterial flows of arms with LRC (FlowLRC) were compared with arterial flows of arms with SRC (FlowSRC) and those without any catheter (FlowNOCATH). RESULTS: Flow in the ulnar, brachial, and subclavian arteries did not show any significant difference between the two types of catheters. The only significant difference was in the radial arteries, showing a lower mean flow in the arms with LRC than in the arms with SRC (2.2 vs. 8.5 cc/min; p = 0.041). Flow reduction in the radial artery (74%) in the arms with LRC compared to the SRC arms showed a tendency to increase ulnar flow as a compensatory mechanism. None of the patients with LRC included in our study had any ischemic events, in spite of observing complete flow occlusion in three radial arteries (18%) from the Doppler study. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, the use of PiCCO long radial catheters reaching the subclavian artery did not produce chronic significant changes in brachial or subclavian flows. However, LRC produces a significant reduction in radial flow and a tendency to increase ulnar flow. When comparing these blood flow changes with those produced by SRC use, only the radial flow reduction was significantly lower, whereas the other arterial flow changes did not significantly differ.