Activation of rye 5RL neocentromere by an organophosphate pesticide.

An interstitial constriction located on the long arm of rye chromosome 5R (5RL) shows neocentromeric activity at meiosis. In some meiocytes this region is strongly stretched orienting with the true centromere to opposite poles at metaphase I, and keeping sister chromatid cohesion at anaphase I. We found previously that the frequency of neocentric activity varied dramatically in different generations suggesting the effect of environmental factors. Here we studied the behavior of the 5RL neocentromere in mono- and ditelosomic 5RL, and mono-, and disomic 5R wheat-rye addition lines, untreated and treated with an organophosphate pesticide. The treated plants form neocentromeres with an about 4.5-fold increased frequency compared to untreated ones, demonstrating that the pesticide promotes neocentric activity. The neocentromere was activated irrespectively of the pairing configuration or the presence of a complete or truncated 5R centromere. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with 2 repetitive sequences (UCM600 and pSc119.2) present at the constriction showed kinetic activity at several locations within this region. Immunostaining with anti-α-tubulin showed that treated plants have abnormal spindles in 46% of the metaphase I cells, indicating that disturbances in spindle formation might promote neocentromere activation.

Neocentrics and holokinetics (holocentrics): chromosomes out of the centromeric rules.

The centromere appears as a single constriction at mitotic metaphase in most eukaryotic chromosomes. Holokinetic chromosomes are the exception to this rule because they do not show any centromeric constrictions. Holokinetic chromosomes are usually forgotten in most reviews about centromeres, despite their presence in a number of animal and plant species. They are generally linked to very intriguing and unusual mechanisms of mitosis and meiosis. Holokinetic chromosomes differ from monocentric chromosomes not only in the extension of the kinetochore plate, but also in many other peculiar karyological features, which could be understood as the 'holokinetic syndrome' that is reviewed in detail. Together with holokinetic chromosomes we review neocentromeric activity, a similarly intriguing case of regions able to pull chromosomes towards the poles without showing the main components reported to be essential to centromeric function. A neocentromere is a chromosomal region different from the true centromere in structure, DNA sequence and location, but is able to lead chromosomes to the cell poles in special circumstances. Neocentromeres have been reported in plants and animals showing different features. Both in humans and Drosophila, neocentric activity appears in somatic cells with defective chromosomes lacking a functional centromere. In most cases in plants, neocentromeres appear in chromosomes which have normal centromeres, but are active only during meiosis. Because of examples such as spontaneous or induced neocentromeres and holokinetic chromosomes, it is becoming less surprising that different structures and DNA sequences of centromeres appear in evolution.

Meiotic loss of the B chromosomes of maize is influenced by the B univalent co-orientation and the TR-1 knob constitution of the A chromosomes.

The suppression of meiotic loss when the maize B chromosomes are unpaired is genetically determined. Two genotypes were selected in 1B x 0B crosses: the H line where the B transmission rate is Mendelian (50%) and the L line where the B is present in only about 40% of the progeny. Using the ZmBs probe located at the centromere and at the distal portion of the B chromosome in FISH, we found that the centromeric and telomeric ends of the B univalent co-orient at metaphase I. This feature seems to promote proper centromere orientation causing the lack of meiotic loss of the unpaired B. The co-orientation was observed in both lines, however in the L line the B univalents were not always properly oriented, showing amphitelic orientation in about 25% of the metaphase I cells. We also studied plants of the H and L lines with FISH to test the possible relation between the knob constitution and B loss. It has been found that the plants of both lines are similarly variable for the 180-bp knob repeat, but they differ in the TR-1 350-bp repeat, the L line having more TR-1 knobs. The use of a 45S rDNA probe which labels chromosome 6, allowed us to determine that this chromosome shows the main variability between the two lines: the L line has TR-1 in both arms, showing a large TR-1 knob on the long arm. The H line has only one, generally located on the short arm besides the NOR.