Sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine / remifentanil for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implant: A retrospective study between 2012 and 2019.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis is a therapeutic alternative for patients with severe aortic stenosis. The procedure is traditionally performed under general anaesthesia; however, sedation is now gaining in popularity because it reduces the need for vasoactive drugs and shortens the patient's stay in the critical care unit and on the ward. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety and potential benefits of sedation with dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing percutaneous implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis in terms of haemodynamic and respiratory complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 222 patients that had undergone percutaneous implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis between 2012 and 2019 under sedation with either dexmedetomidine plus remifentanil (DEX-RMF) or propofol plus remifentanil (PROPO-RMF). We collected data on complications, mainly haemodynamic and respiratory, during and after the procedure. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between sedation with dexmedetomidine and propofol (in combination with remifentanil) in terms of haemodynamic stability and intraprocedural cerebral blood oxygen. In the DEX-RMF group, however, mean blood pressure, midazolam dose, and duration of anaesthesia were lower compared with the PROPO-RMF group, but the incidence of haemodynamic and respiratory complications did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that sedation, particularly with adjuvant dexmedetomidine, is a valid anaesthetic techniques in percutaneous aortic valve prosthesis implantation.

Circulating activated protein C is reduced in young survivors of myocardial infarction and inversely correlates with the severity of coronary lesions.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular risk factors for myocardial infarction (MI) are less frequent in younger than in older MI survivors. Therefore, the thrombotic component of MI may play a more important role at a young age. As activated protein C (APC) provides systemic anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory protection, a low plasma APC level may be an arterial thrombotic risk factor. AIM: To determine whether there is an association between reduced APC levels and early MI and severe coronary lesions. METHODS: APC was measured in 231 young MI survivors and 231 controls. RESULTS: Low APC levels were significantly associated with MI. Compared with the fourth quartile, the odds ratio (OR) for APC values in the first quartile was 3.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.1-6.4], and 3.2 (1.5-7.0) after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. Moreover, each decrease of 0.43 ng mL(-1) (1 SD) in APC increased the OR 1.7 times (1.4-2.2), and 1.5 times (1.2-1.9) after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. Low APC levels were also associated with the number of coronary arteries affected and with the severity of coronary lesions (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant association between low circulating APC levels and both early MI and the extent and severity of coronary atherosclerosis, which might be related to the anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory properties of APC.

[Fructosamine and glycosylated hemoglobin as parameters of hyperglycemia]. / Fructosamina y hemoglobina glicosilada como parámetros de la hiperglucemia.

We have determined the parameters fructosamine and A1 glycosylated hemoglobin, observing a good correlation between them. When analyzing both techniques, the determination of fructosamine proved to be more precise. Considering the significance of each of the tests, we conclude that these parameters cannot substitute for each other but are complementary and that the convenience of fructose determination can not invalidate the utility of determining the glycosylated hemoglobin.