Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Urology ; 44(3): 451-7, 1994 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8073566

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the optimal instruments and techniques for biopsy of upper urinary tract lesions through the small working channel in flexible and small semirigid ureteroscopes. METHODS: Urinary tract filling defects and other lesions were accessed with rigid or flexible ureteroscopy and biopsies were done using one or more devices: a 3 F cup biopsy forceps, 2.5 F and 3 F baskets, 2.5 F and 3 F graspers, 3 F snare, brush, and aspiration catheters. All samples, including the cup forceps samples, were sent for cytopathologic study, with those containing grossly visible tissue particles processed as a cell block. Only those specimens reported definitely positive or negative were considered diagnostic, whereas the others were grouped as nondefinitive. Not all sampling techniques could be used in every patient because of the size of the lesion and the technical limitations, including bleeding and instrument position during biopsy. RESULTS: There were 55 procedures in 43 patients. The indications included hematuria, filling defect, abnormal cytology, and periodic surveillance. A basket was used in 22 procedures and gave unequivocal results in 15. The other samples were equivocal, nondiagnostic, or unsuitable. The biopsy forceps provided a definitive result in 16 of 21 samples and the grasper was definitive in 5 of 6 samples. We could not obtain a suitable specimen using a snare in 2 cases and the brush gave a definitive result in only 5 of 11 cases. Samples of aspirate and washings were definitive in less than 50% of instances but detected some tumors for which other techniques were equivocal. CONCLUSIONS: For the best results, the largest biopsy specimen possible should be obtained. Aspiration or wash alone is often not diagnostic but can give a diagnosis in some patients. Tissue sampling devices, such as the forceps and basket, have an advantage in obtaining a larger sample. Cytopathologic techniques are particularly useful for handling and interpreting the small specimens obtained with ureteroscopic biopsy techniques.


Subject(s)
Endoscopes , Kidney Diseases/pathology , Ureteral Diseases/pathology , Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy/instrumentation , Biopsy/methods , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Female , Hematuria/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Urologic Neoplasms/pathology
4.
J Urol ; 144(6): 1356-8, 1990 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2231925

ABSTRACT

Use of fluoroscopy during ureteroscopy increases the risk of radiation exposure to the urologist and patient. Radiation entrance dosages were measured at skin level in 37 patients, and at the neck, trunk and finger of the urologist, and neck and trunk of the circulating nurse. Radiation exposure time was measured in 79 patients, and was related to the purpose of the procedure and the type of ureteroscope used, whether rigid or flexible. Exposure could be minimized by decreasing the fluoroscopy time. A portable C-arm fluoroscopy unit with electronic imaging and last image hold mode should be used to minimize exposure time. Lead aprons and thyroid shields should be used by the urologist and other personnel in the endoscopy room.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy , Fluoroscopy , Occupational Exposure , Radiation Monitoring , Radiation Protection , Urology , Humans , Operating Rooms , Patients , Radiation Dosage , Risk Factors , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...