ABSTRACT
AIMS: This article explores the structures of relational resources that individuals with psychiatric disorders get from their family configurations using the concept of social capital. METHODS: The research is based on a sample of 54 individuals with psychiatric disorders and behavioural problems, and a comparison sample of 54 individuals without a clinical record matched to the clinical respondents for age and sex. Standard measures of social capital from social network methods are applied on family configurations of individuals from both samples. Differences are tested by variance analysis. RESULTS: Structures of family resources available to individuals with psychiatric disorders are distinct. Individuals with psychiatric disorders perceive themselves as less central in their family configurations and less connected to their family members. Their significant family members are perceived as less connected with each other. As a whole, their family configurations are smaller and do not include spouses or partners. Therefore bridging and bonding social capitals are not readily available for them. CONCLUSION: As family configurations of individuals with psychiatric disorders provide fewer relational resources than other families, they are not able to deal with social integration of individuals with psychiatric disorders on their own.
Subject(s)
Family/psychology , Interpersonal Relations , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Object Attachment , Social Environment , Adult , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/psychology , Young AdultABSTRACT
The present study describes an ultra-rapid opiate detoxification method using direct transition from heroin or methadone to oral naltrexone after deep sedation with oral midazolam in conjunction with ondansetron and clonidine treatment. Twenty patients were detoxified with the method. No serious events occurred, but two out of three patients vomited during the acute phase of deep sedation, which involves some risks. Withdrawal symptoms were still present 24 h after detoxification and 80% of the patients relapsed during a 6-month follow-up.
