Short-term effects of small volume saline infusion on acid base equilibrium in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Short-term acid-base effects of 0.9% saline solution infusion are not well described. Aim of this study was to assess the effects of a fluid challenge with 0.9% saline in critically ill patients according to the Stewart's approach, which allows a precise determination of acid base equilibrium. METHODS: In 40 mechanically ventilated critically ill patients, acid-base variables according to Stewart's approach were measured before and after 30 minutes from the infusion of 0.5L of 0.9% saline. Patients were divided in saline responder (fractional sodium excretion increase <0.5) and non-responders, and in patients with (estimated glomerular filtration rate >63 mL/min) and without renal impairment. RESULTS: After saline infusion, plasma sodium concentration did not change (138 [135-141] vs. 138 [135-140] mEq/L, P=0.646), while chloride concentration significantly increased (102 [100-106] vs. 104 [191-106] mEq/L, P=0.003), reducing strong ion difference (37.0 [34.9-38.0] vs. 35.4 [32.7-37.5] mEq/L, P=0.004) without any impact on pH, due to the concomitant albumin dilution. In saline non-responders, the increase of plasma chloride concentration caused a reduction in strong ion difference, while in saline responders both plasma chloride concentration and strong ion difference remained similar. Patients with and without renal impairment presented a similar acid-base response. CONCLUSIONS: The infusion of 0.9% saline reduced strong ion difference by increasing plasma chloride concentration, with no effect on pH due to concomitant albumin dilution. Saline non-responders, characterized by the ability to excrete the sodium excess, were more likely to suffer the acidifying effects of saline infusion, while renal function did not affect the acid-base response to saline infusion.

The evaluation of a non-invasive respiratory monitor in ards patients in supine and prone position.

PURPOSE: The Prone positioning in addition to non invasive respiratory support is commonly used in patients with acute respiratory failure. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of an impedance-based non-invasive respiratory volume monitor (RVM) in supine and in prone position. METHODS: In sedated, paralyzed and mechanically ventilated patients in volume-controlled mode with acute respiratory distress syndrome scheduled for prone positioning it was measured and compared non-invasively tidal volume and respiratory rate provided by the RVM in supine and, subsequently, in prone position, by maintaining unchanged the ventilatory setting. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled. No significant difference was found between measurements in supine and in prone position either for tidal volume (p = 0.795; p = 0.302) nor for respiratory rate (p = 0.181; p = 0.604). Comparing supine vs. prone position, the bias and limits of agreements for respiratory rate were 0.12 bpm (-1.4 to 1.6) and 20 mL (-80 to 120) for tidal volume. CONCLUSIONS: The RVM is accurate in assessing tidal volume and respiratory rate in prone compared to supine position. Therefore, the RVM could be applied in non-intubated patients with acute respiratory failure receiving prone positioning to monitor respiratory function.