Factors associated with depression in patients undergoing rehabilitation for chronic pain: a cross-sectional analytical study at a referral hospital in Peru.

Despite the well-known impact of depression on patients with chronic pain and its association, few studies have evaluated its related factors in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation settings. The objective of the present study was to assess the factors associated with depression in adult patients undergoing rehabilitation for chronic pain at Hospital Rebagliati (HNERM) in Peru. A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted between June and August 2023, involving 212 adult patients with chronic pain undergoing rehabilitation at HNERM. Data were collected through a survey, including sociodemographic information, pain characteristics, and depression assessment using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and generalized linear models to identify factors associated with depression. Among 212 participants, 17.9% had a depression diagnosis based on the PHQ-9 (cutoff score: 10 points). Factors associated with a higher frequency of depression included a time since pain diagnosis of 3-6 months [adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR): 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.27], severe pain (aPR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.04-1.32), comorbidities (for 1: aPR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.08-1.35; for 2: aPR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.06-1.29; for ≥3: aPR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.10-1.47), use of ≥2 medications for pain management (aPR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.13-1.42), and receipt of psychological therapy (aPR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.09-1.46). Nonpharmacological interventions did not show an association with an increased prevalence of depression. These findings underscore the significance of adopting a comprehensive approach to chronic pain management, including the screening, assessment, and treatment of associated depression.

Analysing the intersection between health emergencies and abortion during Zika in Brazil, El Salvador and Colombia.

The Zika outbreak of 2015-7 is a lens to analyse the positioning of abortion within in global health security. The sequelae of the virus almost exclusively affected newborn children, manifested through Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS), and a focus on women at risk of, planning or being pregnant. At the global level, debate considered whether Zika would provide impetus for regulatory change for reproductive rights in Latin America, a region with some of the most restrictive abortion regulation in the world. However, regulatory change for abortion did not occur. We analyse why the Zika health emergency did not lead to any changes in abortion regulation through multi-method analysis of the intersection between Zika, health emergencies and abortion in Brazil, Colombia and El Salvador. These case study countries were purposefully selected; each had Zika infected women (albeit with differing incidence) yet represent diverse regulatory environments for abortion. Our comparative research is multi-method: framework analysis of key informant interviews (n = 49); content analysis of women's enquiries to a medical abortion telemedicine provider; and, policy analysis of (inter)national-level Zika response and abortion policies. We consider this within literature on global health security, and the prioritisation of a particular approach to epidemic control. Within this securitized landscape, despite increased public debate about abortion regulatory change, no meaningful change occurred, due to a dominant epidemiological approach to the Zika health emergency in all three countries and prominent conservative forces in government and within anti-abortion rights movements. Simultaneously, we demonstrate that regulation did not deter all women from seeking such service clandestinely.

Zika, abortion and health emergencies: a review of contemporary debates.

BACKGROUND: The Zika outbreak provides pertinent case study for considering the impact of health emergencies on abortion decision-making and/or for positioning abortion in global health security debates. MAIN BODY: This paper provides a baseline of contemporary debates taking place in the intersection of two key health policy areas, and seeks to understand how health emergency preparedness frameworks and the broader global health security infrastructure is prepared to respond to future crises which implicate sexual and reproductive rights. Our paper suggests there are three key themes that emerge from the literature; 1) the lack of consideration of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in outbreak response 2) structural inequalities permeate the landscape of health emergencies, epitomised by Zika, and 3) the need for rights based approaches to health. CONCLUSION: Global health security planning and response should specifically include programmatic activity for SRH provision during health emergencies.