Exploring a deep learning neural architecture for closed Literature-based discovery.

Scientific literature presents a wealth of information yet to be explored. As the number of researchers increase with each passing year and publications are released, this contributes to an era where specialized fields of research are becoming more prevalent. As this trend continues, this further propagates the separation of interdisciplinary publications and makes keeping up to date with literature a laborious task. Literature-based discovery (LBD) aims to mitigate these concerns by promoting information sharing among non-interacting literature while extracting potentially meaningful information. Furthermore, recent advances in neural network architectures and data representation techniques have fueled their respective research communities in achieving state-of-the-art performance in many downstream tasks. However, studies of neural network-based methods for LBD remain to be explored. We introduce and explore a deep learning neural network-based approach for LBD. Additionally, we investigate various approaches to represent terms as concepts and analyze the affect of feature scaling representations into our model. We compare the evaluation performance of our method on five hallmarks of cancer datasets utilized for closed discovery. Our results show the chosen representation as input into our model affects evaluation performance. We found feature scaling our input representations increases evaluation performance and decreases the necessary number of epochs needed to achieve model generalization. We also explore two approaches to represent model output. We found reducing the model's output to capturing a subset of concepts improved evaluation performance at the cost of model generalizability. We also compare the efficacy of our method on the five hallmarks of cancer datasets to a set of randomly chosen relations between concepts. We found these experiments confirm our method's suitability for LBD.

Exploring Representations for Singular and Multi-Concept Relations for Biomedical Named Entity Normalization.

Since the rise of the COVID-19 pandemic, peer-reviewed biomedical repositories have experienced a surge in chemical and disease related queries. These queries have a wide variety of naming conventions and nomenclatures from trademark and generic, to chemical composition mentions. Normalizing or disambiguating these mentions within texts provides researchers and data-curators with more relevant articles returned by their search query. Named entity normalization aims to automate this disambiguation process by linking entity mentions onto their appropriate candidate concepts within a biomedical knowledge base or ontology. We explore several term embedding aggregation techniques in addition to how the term's context affects evaluation performance. We also evaluate our embedding approaches for normalizing term instances containing one or many relations within unstructured texts.

Measuring the quality of patient-physician communication.

Patient-physician communication is an often overlooked yet a very important aspect of providing medical care. Positive patient-physician quality of communication within discourse has an influence on various aspects of a consultation such as a patient's treatment adherence to prescribed medical regimen and their medical care outcome. As few reference standards exist for exploring semantics within the patient-physician setting and its effects on personalized healthcare, this paper presents a study exploring three methods to capture, model and evaluate patient-physician communication among three distinct data-sources. We introduce, compare and contrast these methods for capturing and modeling patient-physician communication quality using relatedness between discourse content within a given consultation. Results are shown for all three data-sources and communication quality scores among physicians recorded. We found our models demonstrate the ability to capture positive communication quality between both participants within a consultation. We also evaluate these findings against self-reported questionnaires highlighting various aspects of the consultation and rank communication quality among seventeen physicians who consulted amid one-hundred and thirty-two patients.

Vector representations of multi-word terms for semantic relatedness.

This paper presents a comparison between several multi-word term aggregation methods of distributional context vectors applied to the task of semantic similarity and relatedness in the biomedical domain. We compare the multi-word term aggregation methods of summation of component word vectors, mean of component word vectors, direct construction of compound term vectors using the compoundify tool, and direct construction of concept vectors using the MetaMap tool. Dimensionality reduction is critical when constructing high quality distributional context vectors, so these baseline co-occurrence vectors are compared against dimensionality reduced vectors created using singular value decomposition (SVD), and word2vec word embeddings using continuous bag of words (CBOW), and skip-gram models. We also find optimal vector dimensionalities for the vectors produced by these techniques. Our results show that none of the tested multi-word term aggregation methods is statistically significantly better than any other. This allows flexibility when choosing a multi-word term aggregation method, and means expensive corpora preprocessing may be avoided. Results are shown with several standard evaluation datasets, and state of the results are achieved.