Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: what is the optimal timing?

Administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation accelerates neutrophil recovery and decreases hospitalization time. The optimal timing for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor infusion remains unknown. In this retrospective, case-controlled, two-armed study, we reviewed our experience at Hahnemann University Hospital to determine whether initiating granulocyte colony-stimulating factor infusions on posttransplant day 0 versus day 8 affects neutrophil recovery time, posttransplant discharge date, total hospital days after high-dose chemotherapy, and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. All patients hospitalized between 1994 and 1998 at Hahnemann University Hospital, Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, who underwent high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation and received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor either on posttransplant day 0 (16 patients) or day 8 (16 patients). The day 0 and day 8 groups had no statistically significant differences in age, sex, weight, height, body surface area, disease characteristics, pretransplant harvesting or conditioning regimens, or transplant CD34+ cell counts. Our main outcome measure was the mean time to reach absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to 0.5 x 10(9)/l, the number of hospital days after transplant, and the total hospital days. The mean days to neutrophil recovery (10.56 versus 9.68, p = 0.48), posttransplant hospital days (13.62 versus 12.81, p = 0.39), and total hospital days (20.25 versus 20.25, p = 1.00) were not significantly different between day 8 and day 0 groups, respectively. No significant effects on neutrophil recovery time, posttransplant hospital days, or total hospital days were observed with the initial granulocyte colony-stimulating factor infusion on day 0 versus day 8 after transplant. Delayed administration may allow substantial cost savings (US$200 x 8 approximately equal to US $1,600 per patient) without affecting clinical outcome. More studies are needed to determine whether greater delay is feasible.

Transverse cervical artery pseudoaneurysm: a rare complication of internal jugular vein cannulation.

Internal jugular vein cannulation has become the preferred approach for temporary hemodialysis catheter placement following reports of an increased incidence of subclavian vein stenosis due to subclavian vein catheterization. Internal jugular vein catheterization is associated with a high rate of successful catheter placement. However, significant complications such as internal carotid artery (ICA) puncture, pneumothorax, vessel erosion, thrombosis, airway obstruction and infection can occur. The most common complication is ICA puncture. More recently a few cases of thyrocervical trunk pseudoaneurysm and fistula following internal jugular vein and subclavian vein catheterization attempts have been reported. Patients with renal failure who are on hemodialysis may have to undergo multiple catheter placements and vascular access interventions. This, along with their comorbid conditions, increases the risk of such complications. Here we report a patient on hemodialysis who developed transverse cervical artery pseudoaneurysm following an attempted right internal jugular vein catheterization. We report this case because of its rarity, to raise awareness of such a complication and to discuss different treatment options, in particular endovascular coil occlusion. A review of relevant literature is also presented.

Transforming growth factor-beta levels in human allograft chronic fibrosis correlate with rate of decline in renal function.

BACKGROUND: Long-term renal transplant function is limited primarily by a progressive scarring process loosely termed "chronic rejection, chronic allograft nephropathy, or allograft fibrosis." Although the etiology of transplant fibrosis is uncertain, several possible factors including chronic cyclosporin A (CsA) exposure may contribute to its pathogenesis. CsA stimulates renal fibrosis perhaps through the induction of the potent pro-sclerotic growth factor, transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta). Previously, we demonstrated that, in human transplant biopsies, acute CsA toxicity but not acute tubular necrosis is associated with elevated levels of renal TGFbeta protein. We now examine whether long-term CsA treatment (>1 year) is associated with elevated levels of intra-allograft TGFbeta and whether heightened expression of TGFbeta is clinically significant. METHODS: Using immunohistochemical techniques, we determined the relative level of expression of intrarenal TGFbeta protein in transplant biopsies. We studied biopsies obtained from 40 CsA-treated patients that were diagnosed as having chronic allograft fibrosis. Biopsies were scored as having minimal or high levels of TGFbeta. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of patients expressed high levels of intra-allograft TGFbeta. This group of patients lost renal function at an average rate of -19.5+/-17.3 ml/min/year. In contrast, patients with minimal or no TGFbeta expression experienced a decline of only -6.2+/-4.1 ml/min/year (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the majority of CsA-treated patients with biopsy proven chronic fibrosis have elevated levels of intra-graft TGFbeta that correlates with an increased rate of decline in renal function.