[A case report of pulmonary actinomycosis and review of the literature].

OBJECTIVE: To improve the awareness of primary pulmonary actinomycosis. METHOD: One case of primary endobronchial actinomycosis was reported and 187 cases of primary pulmonary actinomycosis reported in the literature were reviewed. RESULTS: A 66-year-old female had had recurrent cough, sputum production and fever for 4 years. Chest X-ray showed pneumonia in the right middle lobe. The diagnosis of pulmonary actinomycosis was confirmed by histopathological examination. The incidence of bronchopulmonary actinomycosis was 2 times higher in males than in females. The common clinical presentations included cough, sputum and chest pain with a shadow or shadows on chest radiograph. The findings on CT included patchy air-space consolidation, multifocal nodular appearance, cavitation, pleural effusions or thickening and hilar and/or mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Accurate diagnosis was generally made by histopathological examination of transbronchoscopic biopsy or surgical samples. Penicillin, tetracycline, erythromycin, sulphanilamide, lincomycin and surgical resection remained to be the treatment of choice over the last 50 years. CONCLUSION: Primary bronchopulmonary actinomycosis is a rare infectious disease. Early diagnosis and proper treatment can lead to good outcomes with a low mortality.

A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial of oseltamivir in the treatment of influenza in a high-risk Chinese population.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oseltamivir treatment in a population at high risk for influenza. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, controlled trial involving Chinese patients with chronic respiratory diseases (chronic bronchitis, obstructive emphysema, bronchial asthma or bronchiectasis) or chronic cardiac disease. Patients showing symptoms of influenza were randomly assigned to receive oral oseltamivir 75 mg twice daily for 5 days (oseltamivir group), or symptomatic treatment (control group) within 48 h after symptom onset. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were duration and severity of illness in influenza-infected patients. Other outcome measures included incidence of complications, antibiotic use, hospitalization and total medical cost. RESULTS: Of the 118 recruited patients, 56 were identified as influenza-infected through laboratory tests (oseltamivir, N = 27; control, N = 29). Relative to symptomatic treatment, oseltamivir significantly reduced the duration of influenza symptoms by 36.8% (p = 0.0479), and the severity by 43.1% (p = 0.0002). In addition, oseltamivir significantly reduced the duration of fever by 45.2% (p = 0.0051), and the time to return to baseline health status by 5 days (p = 0.0011). The incidence of complications (11% vs. 45%, p = 0.0053) and antibiotic use (37% vs. 69%, p = 0.0167) were also significantly lower in the oseltamivir group compared with the control group. The cost of treating influenza and its complications was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.2462). CONCLUSIONS: Oseltamivir is effective and well tolerated in high-risk patients with chronic respiratory or cardiac diseases. It can reduce the duration and severity of influenza symptoms and decrease the incidence of secondary complications and antibiotic use, without increasing the total medical cost.

[A multicenter randomized controlled study of the efficacy and safety of oseltamivir in the treatment of influenza in a high risk population].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oseltamivir in the treatment of influenza in a high risk population. METHODS: A randomized, open, control trial was conducted from Nov. 2002 to Feb. 2003. Patients with chronic respiratory disease, such as chronic bronchitis, obstructive emphysema, bronchial asthma, bronchiectasis or chronic cardiac disease, and with symptoms of influenza were enrolled. They should satisfy the following criteria: Fever > or = 37.8 degrees C plus at least two of the following influenza symptoms: coryza/nasal congestion, sore throat, cough, myalgia/muscle aches and pain, fatigue, headache and chills/sweats. Within 48 h after the onset of the symptoms, the patients were randomly assigned to oseltamivir group (oseltamivir 75 mg, twice daily for 5 days) or control group (symptom relief medicine only). RESULTS: Fifty-six of the 108 recruited patients were identified as influenza-infected through laboratory test. They were defined as intent-to-treat infected population (ITTI) (27 oseltamivir, 29 control). The duration of influenza symptom was 64 h shorter (36.7%) and AUC score of the influenza symptom was decreased by 618 (43.1%) in the oseltamivir group as compared with those in the control group. The fever duration was 46.8 h (45.0%) less in the oseltamivir group than that in the control group. It took 6 d for the oseltamivir group and 11 days for the control group to recover to the basic health status. Secondary complications such as bronchitis, sinusitis and pneumonia occurred 11% (3/27) in the oseltamivir group and 45% (13/29) in the control group. The treatment expense for influenza and its complication was 587.4 RMB in the oseltamivir group and 786.5 RMB in the control group, which showed no significant difference (P = 0.246). CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that oseltamivir is effective and well tolerated in patients with chronic respiratory or cardiac diseases. It can reduce the fever duration and severity of influenza symptom, and decrease the incidence of secondary complications and antibiotic use, while does not increase the total medical cost.