ABSTRACT
A pre folded energy absorbing device, which is the key device of energy absorption anti impact for roadway support, is tested by quasi-static compression and simulated. The energy absorbing device is divided into zones, and the influence of the area on the load displacement curve of the energy absorbing device is studied according to the area. It is found that the error of numerical simulation is within 5%, indicating that the finite element modeling procedure is appropriate for the problem analyzed here. The device crushes following the pre folded origami pattern in a stable progressive. The device was divided into four areas: the upper and lower opening region of the concave surface four corner parts; the other areas of opening regions; the middle fold edge; the surrounding four sides edge. Each area has effect on the first drop stage and the second rise stage of the load displacement curve. The middle fold edge area has an effect on the peak load value of load displacement curve. Four indicators of peak load, average load, load efficiency, and specific energy absorption were generated from the results of numerical simulation. The strength enhancement of corner region can ensure the energy absorbing device with low peak load and high mean crushing load. The other areas of opening regions affect the first descending and second ascending of the curve. The first rising stage bears the load from the middle edge.
ABSTRACT
Many previous event-related potential (ERP) studies have linked the feedback related negativity (FRN) component with medial frontal cortex processing and associated this component with depression. Few if any studies have investigated the processing of neutral feedback in mildly depressive subjects in the normal population. Two experiments compared brain responses to neutral feedback with behavioral performance in mildly depressed subjects who scored highly on the Beck Depression Inventory (high BDI) and a control group with lower BDI scores (low BDI). In the first study, the FRN component was recorded when neutral, negative or positive feedback was pseudo-randomly delivered to the two groups in a time estimation task. In the second study, real feedback was provided to the two groups in the same task in order to measure their actual accuracy of performance. The results of experiment one (Exp. 1) revealed that a larger FRN effect was elicited by neutral feedback than by negative feedback in the low BDI group, but no significant difference was found between neutral condition and negative condition in the High BDI group. The present findings demonstrated that depressive tendencies influence the processing of neutral feedback in medial frontal cortex. The FRN effect may work as a helpful index for investigating cognitive bias in depression in future studies.
