ABSTRACT
AIM: To investigate the feasibility of a SEMS (self-expandable metallic stent) as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 83 patients that were in accordance with inclusion criteria; of these, 33 patients that underwent fluoroscopy-guided SEMS placement followed by elective curative resection were classified as a SEMS group and 50 patients, who received emergency surgery (ES), were classified as an ES group. The clinicopathological characteristics, surgery-related parameters, complications, and three-year survival rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: No significant differences between the two groups were observed in any of the clinicopathologic characteristics except for higher preoperative absolute neutrophil count in the ES group (P < 0.001). Compared to the ES group, the SEMS group has significantly more cases, which featured a laparoscopic approach (72.7% vs. 14.0%, P < 0.001), lower overall stoma rate (0% vs. 34.0%, P < 0.001), and lower overall postoperative morbidity (27.3% vs. 56.0%, P=0.010). The oncological outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups in terms of three-year overall survival (P=0.125). The technical and clinical success rates of stent placement were 91.7% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with the stent-surgery approach had significant short-term superiorities and similar long-term outcomes, compared to patients who had emergency surgery alone. The SEMS is, therefore, safe and feasible as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate the prognostic significance of preoperative albumin to globulin ratio (AGR) in patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: According to the inclusion criteria, 269 GC patients (male:female=127:67; median age: 67 years) with a stage I through III who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and R0 resection were included. These patients were categorized into two groups, namely low AGR group and high AGR group, based on a cutoff point that was obtained using a receiver-operating characteristic curve. The correlations of preoperative AGR with the clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to assess the prognostic value of preoperative AGR. RESULTS: Age, gender, tumor size, T stage, and preoperative hemoglobin were significantly different between the low and high AGR groups (p<0.05). Moreover, using binary logistic regression analysis, female gender, older age, larger tumor size, and lower preoperative hemoglobin were found to be independent risk factors of low preoperative AGR. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significantly lower overall survival for the low AGR group (13 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 10.9-15.1) compared to the high AGR group (17 months; 95% CI, 13.8-20.2; p=0.014). The univariate analysis of all the variables showed that overall survival was significantly related to age; tumor size; differentiation degree; T stage; N stage; tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage; preoperative AGR; and hemoglobin (p<0.05). Results of multivariate analysis showed that low preoperative AGR (<1.36) was an independent risk factor for poorer overall survival in GC patients (odds ratio [OR]=1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.1; p=0.041). CONCLUSION: Preoperative AGR was significantly associated with the prognosis of GC patients in our study. In addition, preoperative AGR is suggested to be a simple but efficient prognosis predicting biomarker in patients with GC.
