Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37202652

ABSTRACT

Studies of health care access and use among historically resilient populations, while common, often field a limited sample size and rarely ask the groups most impacted by health inequities to weigh in. This is especially so for research and programs that focus on the American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) population. The present study addresses this gap by examining data from a cross-sectional survey of AIANs in Los Angeles County. To better interpret project findings and generate culturally relevant contexts, qualitative feedback was gathered at a community forum held in Spring 2018. Because recruitment of AIANs has historically been challenging, purposive sampling was employed to strategically identify a larger eligible pool. Among those who were eligible, 94% completed the survey (n = 496). AIANs who were enrolled in a tribe were 32% more likely to use the Indian Health Service (IHS), compared with those who were not enrolled (95% CI: 20.4%, 43.2%; p < .0001). In multivariable modeling, the strongest factors influencing IHS access and use were: tribal enrollment, preference for culturally-specific health care, proximity of the services to home or work, having Medicaid, and having less than a high school education. Feedback from the community forum indicated cost and trust (of a provider) were important considerations for most AIANs. Study findings reveal heterogeneous patterns of health care access and use in this population, suggesting a need to further improve the continuity, stability, and the image of AIANs' usual sources of care (e.g., IHS, community clinics).

2.
Vaccine ; 41(2): 581-589, 2023 01 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36513536

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries are at high risk of experiencing severe disease from influenza. Yet, immunization assessment followed by influenza vaccination (when needed) are not regularly performed at Community-Based Adult Services (CBAS) centers in/near medically underserved areas. To better understand this challenge, an organizational assessment was conducted in early 2020 to identify and examine modifiable factors that may impede or facilitate immunization assessment and influenza vaccination at CBAS centers in Los Angeles County (LAC), California. METHODS: All 158 CBAS centers in LAC were asked to complete a 17-question survey. The survey asked about immunization assessment, gaps in communication with primary care providers, knowledge and use of the California Immunization Registry (CAIR), and institutional policies for influenza vaccination. In addition, the survey asked each center about its vaccination policy for staff and clients, including whether or not increasing vaccinations was an interest/priority for the center. Best subsets algorithms (regression models) were performed to identify factors that may influence CBAS centers' practices on immunization assessment and vaccination. RESULTS: Of the 158 centers, 101 (66 %) completed the survey. A majority did not conduct immunization assessments for influenza (n = 59; 58 %); nearly-two-thirds (n = 70; 71 %) reported it would be feasible to do so if the practice is integrated as part of the individualized/nursing plan of care. Best subsets algorithms showed the strongest factors influencing whether CBAS centers assess for influenza vaccination were: center size, staff training on CAIR, presence of barriers to vaccination, and the belief that it is the center's responsibility to conduct immunization assessments and vaccinations. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that practice gaps in immunization assessment and influenza vaccination are common at LAC's CBAS centers. Closing these gaps may help LAC (and California) improve influenza vaccine uptake and other vaccinations (e.g., pneumococcal, COVID-19) among the most vulnerable of the state's aging populations, Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Aged , Humans , Adult , United States , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Medicaid , Medicare , Community Health Services , Vaccination
3.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(7): ofaa174, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32665956

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic-inappropriate prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTI) is 45% among urgent care centers (UCCs) in the United States. Locally in our UCCs, antibiotic-inappropriate prescribing for ARTI is higher-over 70%. METHODS: We used a quasi-experimental design to implement 3 behavioral interventions targeting antibiotic-inappropriate/non-guideline-concordant prescribing for ARTI at 3 high-volume rural UCCs and analyzed prescribing rates pre- and post-intervention. The 3 interventions were (1) staff/patient education, (2) public commitment, and (3) peer comparison. For peer comparison, providers were sent feedback emails with their prescribing data during the intervention period and a blinded ranking email comparing them with their peers. Providers were categorized as "low prescribers" (ie,  ≤23% antibiotic-inappropriate prescriptions based off the US National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria 2020 goal) or "high prescribers" (ie,  ≥45%-the national average of antibiotic-inappropriate prescribing for ARTI). An interrupted time series (ITS) analysis compared prescribing for ARTI (the primary outcome) over a 16-month period before the intervention and during the 6-month intervention period, for a total of 22 months, across the 3 UCCs. RESULTS: Fewer antibiotic-inappropriate prescriptions were written during the intervention period (57.7%) compared with the pre-intervention period (72.6%) in the 3 UCCs, resulting in a 14.9% absolute decrease in percentage of antibiotic-inappropriate prescriptions. The ITS analysis revealed that the rate of antibiotic-inappropriate prescribing was statistically significantly different pre-intervention compared with the intervention period (95% confidence interval, -4.59 to -0.59; P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of rural UCCs, we reduced antibiotic-inappropriate prescribing for ARTI using 3 behavioral interventions.

4.
Dermatol Surg ; 43(3): 415-423, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28060171

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have indicated secondary intention (SI) healing utilization for Mohs surgical defects beyond conventionally accepted indications. OBJECTIVE: To characterize potentially more expansive guidelines for when SI healing is indicated or appropriate in dermatologic surgery. METHODS: A survey study was e-mailed to the American College of Mohs Surgery in 2015. A group of 293 respondents addressed factors influencing decisions to heal surgical defects secondarily. RESULTS: The most experienced surgeons were significantly more likely to heal deep and larger wounds secondarily. Many surgeons elect SI healing in patients with current or previous wound dehiscence, flap necrosis, or infection; in patients who have undergone skin cancer excisions before, or who are elderly, and; if the lesion was sent for permanent section, or when treating high-risk, large, recurrent, or aggressive tumors. CONCLUSION: Broader indications for SI healing of Mohs surgical defects may be appropriate than previously understood. In addition to concave, temporal, periocular, perinasal, and periauricular sites, SI healing may be appropriate for convex sites such as the scalp and anterior lower extremity, deep wounds, and large wounds, as well as wounds with dehiscence, flap necrosis, or infection. Certain patient-specific and lesional factors are also appropriate indications for SI healing.


Subject(s)
Mohs Surgery , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Care , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Wound Healing , Guidelines as Topic , Health Surveys , Humans , Intention , Mohs Surgery/adverse effects , Postoperative Care/methods , Reoperation , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
5.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 13(1): 40-8, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26545047

ABSTRACT

Hospitalized salmonellosis patients with concurrent chronic conditions may be at increased risk for adverse outcomes, increasing the costs associated with hospitalization. Identifying important modifiable risk factors for this predominantly foodborne illness may assist hospitals, physicians, and public health authorities to improve management of these patients. The objectives of this study were to (1) quantify the burden of salmonellosis hospitalizations in the United States, (2) describe hospitalization characteristics among salmonellosis patients with concurrent chronic conditions, and (3) examine the relationships between salmonellosis and comorbidities by four hospital-related outcomes. A retrospective analysis of salmonellosis discharges was conducted using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Nationwide Inpatient Sample for 2011. A supplemental trend analysis was performed for the period 2000-2011. Hospitalization characteristics were examined using multivariable regression modeling, with a focus on four outcome measures: in-hospital death, total amount billed by hospitals for services, length of stay, and disease severity. In 2011, there were 11,032 total salmonellosis diagnoses; 7496 were listed as the primary diagnosis, with 86 deaths (case-fatality rate = 1.2%). Multivariable regression analyses revealed a greater number of chronic conditions (≥4) among salmonellosis patients was associated with higher mean total amount billed by hospitals for services, longer length of stay, and greater disease severity (p ≤ 0.05). From 2000 to 2011, hospital discharges for salmonellosis increased by 27.2%, and the mean total amount billed by hospitals increased nearly threefold: $9,777 (2000) to $29,690 (2011). Observed increases in hospitalizations indicate the burden of salmonellosis remains substantial in the United States. The positive association between increased number of chronic conditions and the four hospital-related outcomes affirms the need for continual healthcare and public health investments to prevent and control this disease in vulnerable groups.


Subject(s)
Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Salmonella Infections/epidemiology , Salmonella/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Campylobacter/physiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Foodborne Diseases/economics , Foodborne Diseases/microbiology , Foodborne Diseases/mortality , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Salmonella Infections/economics , Salmonella Infections/microbiology , Salmonella Infections/mortality , Toxoplasma/physiology , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
7.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 91(5): 959-64, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25200264

ABSTRACT

Few studies have quantified toxoplasmosis mortality, associated medical conditions, and productivity losses in the United States. We examined national multiple cause of death data and estimated productivity losses caused by toxoplasmosis during 2000-2010. A matched case-control analysis examined associations between comorbid medical conditions and toxoplasmosis deaths. In total, 789 toxoplasmosis deaths were identified during the 11-year study period. Blacks and Hispanics had the highest toxoplasmosis mortality compared with whites. Several medical conditions were associated with toxoplasmosis deaths, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), lymphoma, leukemia, and connective tissue disorders. The number of toxoplasmosis deaths with an HIV codiagnosis declined from 2000 to 2010; the numbers without such a codiagnosis remained static. Cumulative disease-related productivity losses for the 11-year period were nearly $815 million. Although toxoplasmosis mortality has declined in the last decade, the infection remains costly and is an important cause of preventable death among non-HIV subgroups.


Subject(s)
Toxoplasmosis/economics , Toxoplasmosis/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Black People , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Comorbidity , Connective Tissue Diseases/epidemiology , Female , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Infant , Leukemia/epidemiology , Lymphoma/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Toxoplasmosis/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , White People , Young Adult
8.
Prev Med ; 67 Suppl 1: S21-7, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24631497

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in nutrient levels of school meals before and after implementation of nutrition interventions at five school districts in two, large U.S. counties. School menu changes were compared against national school meal recommendations. METHODS: A large urban school district in Los Angeles County (LAC), California and four school districts in suburban Cook County (SCC), Illinois implemented school meal nutrition interventions. Nutrition analyses were conducted for school breakfast and lunch before and after changes were made to the meal programs. Means, % change, and net calories (kilocalories or kcal) offered as a result of the nutrition interventions were calculated. RESULTS: School districts in both counties made district-wide changes in their school breakfast and lunch menus. Menu changes resulted in a net reduction of calories, sugar, and sodium content offered in the meals. Net fewer calories offered as a result of the nutrition interventions were estimated to be about 64,075kcal per student per year for LAC and 22,887kcal per student per year for SCC. CONCLUSIONS: Nutrition interventions can have broad reach through changes in menu offerings to school-aged children and adolescents. However, further research is needed to examine how these changes affect student food selection and consumption.


Subject(s)
Food Services/statistics & numerical data , Nutrition Policy , Obesity/prevention & control , Schools , Adolescent , Calorimetry , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Food Services/standards , Humans , Illinois/epidemiology , Los Angeles/epidemiology , Male , Meals , Menu Planning , Nutrition Assessment , Obesity/epidemiology , United States , United States Department of Agriculture
9.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 20(1 Suppl 1): S16-22, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24322811

ABSTRACT

Since sodium is ubiquitous in the food supply, recent approaches to sodium reduction have focused on increasing the availability of lower-sodium products through system-level and environmental changes. This article reviews integrated efforts by the Los Angeles County Sodium Reduction Initiative to implement these strategies at food venues in the County of Los Angeles government. The review used mixed methods, including a scan of the literature, key informant interviews, and lessons learned during 2010-2012 to assess program progress. Leveraging technical expertise and shared resources, the initiative strategically incorporated sodium reduction strategies into the overall work plan of a multipartnership food procurement program in Los Angeles County. To date, 3 County departments have incorporated new or updated nutrition requirements that included sodium limits and other strategies. The strategic coupling of sodium reduction to food procurement and general health promotion allowed for simultaneous advancement and acceleration of the County's sodium reduction agenda.


Subject(s)
Food Services/organization & administration , Government Agencies/organization & administration , Public Health , Sodium, Dietary/administration & dosage , Food Services/standards , Government Agencies/standards , Humans , Los Angeles , Program Evaluation
10.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 20(1 Suppl 1): S43-9, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24322815

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Children consume more than one-third of their daily food intake in schools, suggesting that these environments are ideal places for intervening on poor dietary behaviors. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of strategy-focused menu planning on the sodium content of student meals served in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD). DESIGN: Pre- and post-LAUSD menu change analyses for school years (SY) 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 were performed using nutritional analysis data and food production records. The analyses assessed changes in sodium content by meal categories. SETTING: 900+ schools, grades K-12, operated by the LAUSD. PARTICIPANTS: The LAUSD Food Services Branch, which serves about 650 000 meals per day. INTERVENTION: A multistage menu planning approach that focused on implementing evidence-based strategies to improve the nutritional content of school breakfast and lunch menus. Engagement and formation of multisectoral partnerships, including public health and parent/student groups, were vital elements of the intervention process. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Sodium content changes in the LAUSD menu, SY 2010-2011 versus SY 2011-2012; other measures include documentation of program reach. RESULTS: From SY 2010-2011 to SY 2011-2012, the mean unweighted sodium levels for elementary (K-5) breakfast and for secondary (6-12) breakfast and lunch decreased. These changes met or exceeded the 2014-2015 US Department of Agriculture sodium targets for school meals and for secondary breakfast, the 2022-2023 target(s). These results, however, were not as notable once student food selection patterns (weighted data) and condiments were considered in the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Use of strategy-focused menu planning as a mechanism to reduce sodium in school meals appeared to be promising, demonstrating favorable declines in mean sodium levels for at least 3 of 4 meal categories in the LAUSD. Student food selection patterns and condiments use, however, can affect the strength of the intervention.


Subject(s)
Food Services/organization & administration , Menu Planning/standards , Schools , Sodium, Dietary/administration & dosage , Breakfast , Food Services/standards , Humans , Los Angeles , Lunch , Program Evaluation , Racial Groups
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL