ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has matured to the treatment of choice for most patients with aortic stenosis (AS). We sought to identify trends in patient and procedural characteristics, and clinical outcomes in all patients who underwent TAVI between 2005 and 2020. METHODS: A single-centre analysis was performed on 1500 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI, divided into three tertiles (T) of 500 patients treated between November 2005 and December 2014 (T1), January 2015 and May 2018 (T2) and June 2018 and April 2020 (T3). RESULTS: Over time, mean age and gender did not change (T1 to T3: 80, 80 and 79 years and 53%, 55% and 52% men, respectively), while the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score declined (T1: 4.5% to T3: 2.7%, pâ¯< 0.001). Use of general anaesthesia also declined over time (100%, 24% and 1% from T1 to T3) and transfemoral TAVI remained the default approach (87%, 94% and 92%). Median procedure time and contrast volume decreased significantly (186, 114 and 56â¯min and 120, 100 and 80â¯ml, respectively). Thirty-day mortality (7%, 4% and 2%), stroke (7%, 3% and 3%), need for a pacemaker (19%, 22% and 8%) and delirium (17%, 12% and 8%) improved significantly, while major bleeding/vascular complications did not change (both approximately 9%, 6% and 6%). One-year survival was 80%, 88% and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Over our 15 years' experience, patient age remained unchanged but the patient risk profile became more favourable. Simplification of the TAVI procedure occurred in parallel with major improvement in outcomes and survival. Bleeding/vascular complications and the need for pacemaker implantation remain the Achilles' heel of TAVI.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have an increased risk of thromboembolic stroke, dependent on clinical variables. Oral anticoagulation significantly decreases the risk of stroke or embolism, but sometimes this is difficult to manage and may be contraindicated. Approximately 90% of atrial thrombi in nonrheumatic AF are found in the left atrial appendage (LAA). A new device has been developed which allows percutaneous LAA occlusion (PLAATO) and might be an alternative to oral anticoagulation. Feasibility in dogs and humans was described previously. METHODS AND RESULTS: As part of an international multicentre trial, three patients received a percutaneous transcatheter LAA occlusion device. Implantations were performed without general anaesthesia, guided by intracardiac and transoesophageal echocardiography and without major complications. The implantations were well tolerated by the patients, who entered a long-term follow-up to be compared with a historical control group. CONCLUSION: Transseptal percutaneous LAA occlusion is feasible. Its role as an alternative to oral anticoagulation, however, needs to be further defined.
